Mark Anthony
Second Unit
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2001
- Messages
- 457
Guys, I think you'll find the preview cut (or '88 turner)has been presented warts 'n' all with a minimum of clean-up, as it represents the director's workprint before he got a chance to fine-tune it, and never did as it was taken out of his hand's to produce the original theatrical release. Even at the time of the '88 cut's release on LaserDisc, Roger Spottiswoode said that version had a couple of bits missing that Sam would have wanted put in, had they have been able to find the trims...
The 2005 edition is what the Peckinpah historian's think the finished product would have looked like had Sam have had a chance to fine-tune it in '73, and it therefore has better quality music source's, better edits of some material etc etc You may not agree with their editorial choices, but I don't think anybody is better placed than them to second-guess what he may or may not have done.
You may not like it, but Warner's are trying to do the right thing here by giving us the literal '73 workprint version and a re-edited fine cut...any one who wishes they'd also included the theatrical release may regret that statement on seeing it, it certainly was a bastard step-child of a film as far as Peckinpah was concerned!
M
The 2005 edition is what the Peckinpah historian's think the finished product would have looked like had Sam have had a chance to fine-tune it in '73, and it therefore has better quality music source's, better edits of some material etc etc You may not agree with their editorial choices, but I don't think anybody is better placed than them to second-guess what he may or may not have done.
You may not like it, but Warner's are trying to do the right thing here by giving us the literal '73 workprint version and a re-edited fine cut...any one who wishes they'd also included the theatrical release may regret that statement on seeing it, it certainly was a bastard step-child of a film as far as Peckinpah was concerned!
M