What's new

Peter Jackson talks Jar Jar and Gollum.... (1 Viewer)

Dwayne

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jan 22, 2000
Messages
770
Just caught this on theforce.net:

Peter Jackson talks Jar Jar and Gollum

Sun, Dec 30, 01 03:29:56 PM EST

The Chicago Sun Times had a interview with Lord of the Rings Director Peter Jackson. He mentions Jar-Jar in his interview. Here is the excerpt in question:

Also expect more of the character Gollum, the big-eyed monkeylike creature from the first film. "He's a computer-generated character voiced by Andy Serkis, but don't expect him to be another Jar Jar Binks,'' Jackson says. In other words, he's not some floppy-eared goofus.

Thanks to Casey for the news, hit the link for more on LOTR.

I wonder if that was a response to Lucas' previous comment where he basically implied that ILM would be the only effects house suitable for LOTR.
 

Jim_C

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2001
Messages
2,058
You know, it funny. A number of us here at HTF are saying there's no need to constantly compare LOTR and SW. There's more than enough room for both.
It seems that Lucas and Jackson aren't setting very good examples for us are they? :)
 

Sam Davatchi

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 15, 1999
Messages
3,150
Real Name
SamD
Yes, I saw it few days ago somewhere else. Actually it’s not bad, he is very polite! He is saying how the character is going to be and gives an example. He is not saying anything negative about Jar Jar. He is just giving an example that Gollum is not like Jar Jar! The bad thing to say is to say that they can’t do it but I can! :D
 

Glenn Overholt

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 24, 1999
Messages
4,201
I find it really sad that he had to address the issue at all. It just tells me that there are too many people out there that have not read the books. What a shame!

Glenn
 

Paul Jenkins

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jan 4, 2000
Messages
965
comparing Jar Jar to Gollum is rather comical, given that Gollum wasn't seen much in LOTR and CGI-wise, didn't hold a candle to Jar Jar.

Now character-wise, we all know people's Jar Jar feelings, which is what I think Jackson was getting a dig in for, making sure fans knew he wasn't going to throw in 'comic' relief along the Jar Jar lines that Lucas did in EpI....
 

Matt Stone

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2000
Messages
9,063
Real Name
Matt Stone
Do you mean that Gollum wasn't in FotR that much? Because he's in The Two Towers for half of the book (movie).
 

Paul Jenkins

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jan 4, 2000
Messages
965
Matt,
Yes, I should have put FOTR, not LOTR, incorrectly implying the entire series, thanks for the correction :)
We'll get to see how good the CGI people are at that point and can then compare Gollum to Jar Jar on a purely CGI level after that...
 

Chuck Mayer

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2001
Messages
8,516
Location
Northern Virginia
Real Name
Chuck Mayer
My basis for WETA's success has been the Cave Troll. Granted, the scene it was in took place in the dark, hiding some technical flaws that might have existed. Jar Jar's stuff mostly took place in sunlight, etc. The Cave Troll however was the most realistic CGI creation I have ever seen. I never once thought during the entire sequence (with the notable exception where Legolas was CGI'd as well) that it did not exist alongside the other characters. Gollum looked OK in his one scene, but not superior to Jar Jar. Hopefully, TTT will see him looking a little less "generated." As for why Gollum is not Jar Jar...that reasoning is simple. Jar Jar existed for ILM to show off...the story was written so George could push the envelope - in short, the story existed to serve the effects. Gollum is a focal point of LOTR - the effects serve the story.

Take care,

Chuck
 

Tom-G

Screenwriter
Joined
Mar 31, 2000
Messages
1,750
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Real Name
Thomas
Jar Jar existed for ILM to show off...the story was written so George could push the envelope - in short, the story existed to serve the effects.
Actually, that's incorrect. George Lucas was not going to have Jar Jar be 100% computer-generated. His orginal intention was to have Ahmed Best (the actor who portrayed Jar Jar) in suit and his head was to be replaced by computer effects. This was on the documentary on the TPM DVD. :)
 

Terrell

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2001
Messages
3,216
From what I've read and seen, even from staunch LOTR fans, both PJ and Lucas have denied that either of them were making the negative comments that most believe they made. I even heard PJ went to Skywalker ranch and ILM sent WETA some software. I don't know how much truth there is to that, but it seems like the fans are more interested in turning this into a war between the two than they are.

As for Jar-Jar, he was always going to be in there, and Tom is correct. So the comment that it was a technical display is incorrect.
 

Chuck Mayer

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2001
Messages
8,516
Location
Northern Virginia
Real Name
Chuck Mayer
So Jar Jar didn't exist to show off CGI because it was originally going to be a suit with a CGI head? I am still not buying it.
Thanks for that info...I saw the documentary as well:)
That doesn't change my take on the situation. I am not attacking Jar Jar here (I am one of the ones that doesn't really care). Jar Jar existed to push the envelope. If what I said implied the story was only written with Jar Jar to be CGI, then I misspoke. The story was written for an alien to be comic relief and to showcase CGI (of his facial expressions, etc). When ILM realized how absolutely painful (and horrid) it would be to place a CGI head on a rubber suit, they simply decided to go whole hog.
To clarify: that is my opinion. I don't know what George was thinking. I have no quotes. Using TPM and the SE's for my basis, I came to the best conclusion I could. George cares about pushing the effects envelope as much as he does his films. Jar Jar's appearance is a result of that.
Take care,
Chuck
P.S. My point is: I am not incorrect any more than anyone else is CORRECT. I dropped an opinion. So did others. That certainly doesn't make me wrong.
 

Morgan Jolley

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2000
Messages
9,718
I think that Lucas and Jackson see it better if they play off of eachother instead of against eachother. They are competing, but being friends about it, so they will both end up successful. In fact, I wouldn't mind seeing a collaborative effort between them.
 

Dwayne

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jan 22, 2000
Messages
770
I'm fairly confident that will work. ;)
In all seriousness, as dissappointed I was with TPM, I have high hopes for ATOC and I wouldn't want anyone else but George to finish his creation. Who knows, maybe I'll have a greater appreciation for TPM after viewing the entire saga as a whole and completed work (assuming of course that it will be completed at one point with no further revisions).
I truly wonder if we have blown this whole thing out of proportion and if Lucas and Jackson are, in fact, mutual admirers.
 

Adam Lenhardt

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2001
Messages
27,031
Location
Albany, NY
It's funny he says that, since I've always thought of Jar Jar as a "good" Gollum. Both are pitiful, but exist in servitude of greater beings. Both are the source of trouble and aid for their storie's hereos. Both have an odd manner of speaking. Gollum is Jar Jar had he developed a second personality trapped by the snares of Sidious' mind tricks.
And technically speaking, while Gollum is defineately a more interesting and three dimensional character, what we've seen so far doesn't matter what they did with Jar Jar. But in the end, if his character is written well, and the voice acting is dead on, it won't matter. The cave trolls wasn't the best CGI I've ever seen. Far from it. But it didn't need to be to serve it's purpose in the film.
 

Terrell

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2001
Messages
3,216
That petition is laughable. First of all, Lucas would probably laugh. Second, I admire what PJ did with LOTR, but I don't want him directing Star Wars. Third, it wouldn't happen in a thousand lifetimes. Does the person that created this have no life whatsoever. Just watch the movie and either like it or dislike it. As big a Star Wars fan as I am, it's just a movie.
I truly wonder if we have blown this whole thing out of proportion and if Lucas and Jackson are, in fact, mutual admirers.
I would say we have and that they are probably admirers of each other's work and most of this so-called animosity is not between them, but the fans. As for the petition, some people need to get a life. That is the most pathetic petition I've ever seen.:laugh:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Forum statistics

Threads
357,068
Messages
5,129,976
Members
144,283
Latest member
Nielmb
Recent bookmarks
0
Top