-

Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

Is the 1.33:1 Aspect Ratio making a comeback?


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 of 14 OFFLINE   Mark-P

Mark-P

    Screenwriter

  • 2,311 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 26 2005
  • Real Name:Mark Probst
  • LocationCamas, WA

Posted April 10 2012 - 03:21 PM

In the past 3 years there have been 4 theatrical movies shot in the vintage 1.33:1 aspect ratio. Fascinating - what is old is new again! Fish Tank (2009) Meek's Cutoff (2010) The Artist (2011) Wuthering Heights (2011)

#2 of 14 OFFLINE   Stan

Stan

    Screenwriter

  • 2,178 posts
  • Join Date: May 18 1999

Posted April 10 2012 - 09:16 PM

In the past 3 years there have been 4 theatrical movies shot in the vintage 1.33:1 aspect ratio. Fascinating - what is old is new again! Fish Tank (2009) Meek's Cutoff (2010) The Artist (2011) Wuthering Heights (2011)

I certainly hope not. Going back to the old projection ratios would be quite a turn off. If they think that by going retro, there may be some success due to massive publicity, but don't see it lasting long.. There may be a small group of artsy, elitist types who would enjoy it, but doubtful enough to make much of a profit and keep on producing films in that style. What's next, blurry black and white films with scratches, missing frames and choppy soundtracks so we can remember the old days? Doubtful.
Stan

#3 of 14 OFFLINE   Malcolm R

Malcolm R

    Executive Producer

  • 11,604 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 2002
  • LocationVermont

Posted April 11 2012 - 01:51 AM

What's next, blurry black and white films with scratches, missing frames and choppy soundtracks so we can remember the old days? Doubtful.

Next thing you know, they'll be making silent films again.
The purpose of an education is to replace an empty mind with an open mind.

#4 of 14 OFFLINE   WillG

WillG

    Producer

  • 5,219 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 30 2003

Posted April 11 2012 - 01:57 AM

What's next, blurry black and white films with scratches, missing frames and choppy soundtracks so we can remember the old days? Doubtful.

Except for the black and white, 2007's "Grindhouse" did exactly that. But, yes, it was a box office failure, so it's pretty much certain that's the last we'll see of that experiment.
STOP HIM! He's supposed to die!

#5 of 14 OFFLINE   Mark-P

Mark-P

    Screenwriter

  • 2,311 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 26 2005
  • Real Name:Mark Probst
  • LocationCamas, WA

Posted April 11 2012 - 06:06 AM

Actually, emulating film-styles of the past is not unheard of. While The Artist is the most recent example, others include Far From Heaven (replicating the 1950s), The Good German (replicating 1940s Black & White), Down with Love (replicating 1960s CinemaScope, complete with rear-projection driving), and don't forget Super 8 which emulates the look and style of an 80s film.

#6 of 14 OFFLINE   Mark-P

Mark-P

    Screenwriter

  • 2,311 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 26 2005
  • Real Name:Mark Probst
  • LocationCamas, WA

Posted April 11 2012 - 06:33 AM

Respectfully, I completely disagree with this point of view. It's only a turn-off to the black bar haters. Filmmakers have a variety of aspect ratios to choose from when beginning to shoot a film. One film may warrant a panoramic 2.4:1 and another may look better in a more confined 1.66:1. There is no reason 1.33:1 should be verboten to modern filmmakers. It was a valid ratio for half a century and can still be valid today. The only people who might not like it are those who feel that all new movies should be standardized to one aspect ratio - 16:9 to match the current TV standard.

I certainly hope not. Going back to the old projection ratios would be quite a turn off. If they think that by going retro, there may be some success due to massive publicity, but don't see it lasting long.. There may be a small group of artsy, elitist types who would enjoy it, but doubtful enough to make much of a profit and keep on producing films in that style. What's next, blurry black and white films with scratches, missing frames and choppy soundtracks so we can remember the old days? Doubtful.



#7 of 14 OFFLINE   Mark-P

Mark-P

    Screenwriter

  • 2,311 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 26 2005
  • Real Name:Mark Probst
  • LocationCamas, WA

Posted January 08 2013 - 08:33 AM

And here's the latest brand-new movie shot and presented in 1.33:1! http://www.dvdbeaver...abu_blu-ray.htm

#8 of 14 OFFLINE   SilverWook

SilverWook

    Screenwriter

  • 1,495 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 11 2006

Posted January 08 2013 - 11:20 AM

Except for the black and white, 2007's "Grindhouse" did exactly that. But, yes, it was a box office failure, so it's pretty much certain that's the last we'll see of that experiment.

"Amazon Women on the Moon" did essentially the same thing in the 80's, emulating a bad print as shown on late night tv. There are several grindhouse style fanedits of other movies floating around.

#9 of 14 OFFLINE   Aaron Silverman

Aaron Silverman

    Lead Actor

  • 9,507 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 22 1999
  • Real Name:Aaron Silverman
  • LocationFlorida

Posted January 09 2013 - 03:36 AM

Call of Cthulhu was a DVD-only release a couple of years ago that was black & white, 1.33:1 and silent (with a music score) for a period feel. The DVD offers the option of listening to a clean soundtrack or one with faked scratches and pops. :) HTF covered the release *brilliantly* here: http://www.hometheat...call-of-cthulhu ;)
"How wonderful it will be to have a leader unburdened by the twin horrors of knowledge and experience." -- Mr. Wick

#10 of 14 OFFLINE   Wayne_j

Wayne_j

    Supporting Actor

  • 544 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 07 2006
  • Real Name:Wayne

Posted January 10 2013 - 04:41 AM

Also attempting retro in the 70's was New York, New York. Scorsese originally wanted to shoot it in 1.37 technicolor and then he found out that no 3-strip cameras were available to shoot with so he went with 1.66 eastman color.

#11 of 14 OFFLINE   Mark-P

Mark-P

    Screenwriter

  • 2,311 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 26 2005
  • Real Name:Mark Probst
  • LocationCamas, WA

Posted April 22 2013 - 08:17 PM

Just to keep this thread up to date, here is the sixth recent release shot in 1.33:1

Blancanieves

Are there any others that I have missed?



#12 of 14 OFFLINE   SilverWook

SilverWook

    Screenwriter

  • 1,495 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 11 2006

Posted April 23 2013 - 01:35 AM

Can current digital movie cameras actually shoot in 1.33:1? Or does the image have to be cropped at the sides in post?



#13 of 14 OFFLINE   Mark-P

Mark-P

    Screenwriter

  • 2,311 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 26 2005
  • Real Name:Mark Probst
  • LocationCamas, WA

Posted April 23 2013 - 02:58 AM

Can current digital movie cameras actually shoot in 1.33:1? Or does the image have to be cropped at the sides in post?

I have no idea what professional cameras are capable of, but these new movies are all presented pillar-boxed in theaters.



#14 of 14 OFFLINE   leopold411

leopold411

    Auditioning

  • 1 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 17 2013
  • Real Name:phil

Posted October 17 2013 - 03:34 PM

I certainly hope not. Going back to the old projection ratios would be quite a turn off. If they think that by going retro, there may be some success due to massive publicity, but don't see it lasting long.. There may be a small group of artsy, elitist types who would enjoy it, but doubtful enough to make much of a profit and keep on producing films in that style. What's next, blurry black and white films with scratches, missing frames and choppy soundtracks so we can remember the old days? Doubtful.

 

Wes Andersons new film The Grand Budapest Hotel is shot in 4 x 3, he's been nominated for 3 oscars and a palme d'Or. Andrea Arnolds Fish Tank won the BAFTA and the Jury prize at Cannes and The Artist won 5 Oscars. I don't think its just a nostalgic fad (although maybe with The Artist) its a stylistic choice. The box like format forces the viewer to intimately focus on a small area rather than a large landscape. I'm surprised more directors are not playing around with the possibilities of different aspect ratios (photographers do all the time), instead most tend to go with the latest trend which doesn't always fit well with their films intention.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users