Jump to content



Sign up for a free account!

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests to win things like this Logitech Harmony Ultimate Remote and you won't get the popup ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

Porn label Digital Underground goes BR only too


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
22 replies to this topic

#1 of 23 Shane Martin

Shane Martin

    Producer

  • 6,017 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 26 1999

Posted January 08 2008 - 11:19 AM

Paramount puts down HD DVD dump rumour | Reg Hardware
Quote:
Meanwhile, another, slightly lesser-known studio has also switched to Blu-ray. Porn label Digital Playground is to adopt Blu-ray exclusively despite initially choosing HD DVD


#2 of 23 Viper

Viper

    Second Unit

  • 370 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 16 2005

Posted January 08 2008 - 12:06 PM

I thought I read a while back that Sony wasn't allowing porn on BD? Although, I don't see why it should matter if they like it or not. Noone needs permission to press media on any other formats (CD, DVD, etc), do they? Sure, Sony has control over what games are allowed on the PS3, but that's the same with all console makers (it's also a major downside for people who want gamesharks, etc for the new systems).

#3 of 23 PaulDA

PaulDA

    Screenwriter

  • 2,575 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 09 2004
  • Real Name:Paul
  • LocationSt. Hubert, Quebec, Canada

Posted January 08 2008 - 12:43 PM

I believe it had to do with the production facilities initially being under Sony's control. I'm sure facilities have expanded and they can't all be under Sony's control (though I could be mistaken).
Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes time, and it annoys the pig.

#4 of 23 Patrick Sun

Patrick Sun

    Studio Mogul

  • 37,617 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 30 1999

Posted January 08 2008 - 01:26 PM

Who pays for pr0n?
"Jee-sus, it's like Iwo Jima out there" - Roger Sterling on "Mad Men"
Patcave | 2006 Films | 2007 Films | Flickr | Comic-Con 2012 | Dragon*Con 2012

#5 of 23 Jose Martinez

Jose Martinez

    Screenwriter

  • 1,113 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 18 2003

Posted January 08 2008 - 01:47 PM

I'd buy this! Posted Image


Live Free or DIE!!!!!

#6 of 23 TravisR

TravisR

    Studio Mogul

  • 21,440 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2004
  • LocationThe basement of the FBI building

Posted January 08 2008 - 02:35 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick Sun
Who pays for pr0n?
Very few anymore. That's why porn has little to no bearing on the format war.

#7 of 23 Viper

Viper

    Second Unit

  • 370 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 16 2005

Posted January 08 2008 - 03:21 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick Sun
Who pays for pr0n?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TravisR
Very few anymore. That's why porn has little to no bearing on the format war.

Yeah. Besides, I prefer the amateur/homemade stuff that you can only find online.

#8 of 23 Don Solosan

Don Solosan

    Supporting Actor

  • 748 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 14 2003

Posted January 08 2008 - 06:18 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by TravisR
Very few anymore. That's why porn has little to no bearing on the format war.

A quick Google search shows 2006 revenue for sales/rentals of video porn to be 3.62 billion.

#9 of 23 Cees Alons

Cees Alons

    Executive Producer

  • 18,547 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 31 1997
  • Real Name:Cees Alons

Posted January 08 2008 - 07:02 PM

Blu pills?



Cees

#10 of 23 Jari K

Jari K

    Producer

  • 3,103 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2007

Posted January 08 2008 - 08:52 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viper
I thought I read a while back that Sony wasn't allowing porn on BD?

Now you understand how the old anti-BD rumors have lived to these days.. Even porno is now Blue. Posted Image

#11 of 23 Jari K

Jari K

    Producer

  • 3,103 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2007

Posted January 08 2008 - 08:54 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jose Martinez
I'd buy this! Posted Image

Wow. Are they real pirates? Posted Image

Seriously, pretty good cover design for a porn film.

#12 of 23 Keith_R

Keith_R

    Screenwriter

  • 1,179 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 16 2001

Posted January 09 2008 - 01:05 AM

This news really perks my interest in BluPosted Image . In all seriousness though, I doubt this will have much of an impact on the current situation.
-Keith-       


#13 of 23 Don May Jr

Don May Jr

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 84 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 29 2003

Posted January 09 2008 - 03:07 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jari K
Now you understand how the old anti-BD rumors have lived to these days.. Even porno is now Blue. Posted Image

That wasn't a rumor. I met with a Sony exec who flew out to meet our company (and took us out to a nice steak dinner! Posted Image ) to discuss BD plans. When the subject of THRILLER: A CRUEL PICTURE came up (a title we released that has scenes of explicit sexual content) and our desire to release it in high-def he TOLD us outright that Sony was not interested, nor would they allow, anything with explicit sexual content to be pressed at their BD disc facilities.

Guess things have changed. Just pointing this out because I'm getting a little tired of seeing this "no porn on BD" stance Sony definitely had at first, being interpreted as a false "anti-BD rumor".
Kindest Regards,

Don May, Jr. - President, Synapse Films
http://www.synapse-films.com

#14 of 23 Mike Williams

Mike Williams

    Screenwriter

  • 1,020 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 03 2003

Posted January 09 2008 - 03:38 AM

A friend of mine has that Pirates movie on HD-DVD and said the quality is a serious rival to VHS. Very poor.

#15 of 23 Jari K

Jari K

    Producer

  • 3,103 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2007

Posted January 09 2008 - 03:48 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don May Jr
..our desire to release it in high-def he TOLD us outright that Sony was not interested, nor would they allow, anything with explicit sexual content to be pressed at their BD disc facilities..

Alright, my bad then. I now actually remember your post from somewhere..

But still, is (was?) Sony the only BD facility place then?

The problem with these type of issues is, that people can take a comment like yours and kinda "use it" to spread those anti-BD rumors. "Blu-ray is against porn and HD DVD has that and that means that Blu-ray will eventually lose" is perhaps not the correct way to put it, since we have now porn on both formats.

So you didn´t spread any rumors, but I´m sure that the story changed a bit in the forums.. I remember some threads like that in some forums.

Btw Don. Any new HD-plans? Posted Image

#16 of 23 loganhunter2002

loganhunter2002

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 73 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 29 2006

Posted January 09 2008 - 04:12 AM

50 bucks for a porn film is too much. You can probably get it cheaper online. Posted Image
Sony STR-DG910
Creative Megaworks 650 THX 6.1 (575 Watts RMS)
Toshiba HD-A2
Toshiba HD-XA2
PS3 60 GigXBox 360Sony KDL40S2000 40" Bravia Flat Panel LCD HDTVSamsung 50" Plasma HPS5033

#17 of 23 JulianK

JulianK

    Supporting Actor

  • 844 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 03 2000

Posted January 09 2008 - 06:08 AM

I believe it's Disney that has the issues with porn duplication, not Sony.

Disney will simply not allow their product to be pressed on lines that are also used for porn. Period.

Since many of the key Blu-ray production companies will be pressing huge amounts of discs for Disney, the choice between the income from that, or the relatively tiny amount of income that pressing a few porn titles would bring in is an easy one.

#18 of 23 Don May Jr

Don May Jr

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 84 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 29 2003

Posted January 09 2008 - 06:17 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jari K
Btw Don. Any new HD-plans? Posted Image

Well, we're chatting about it right now. Now that there seems to be (at least at this moment) a clear winner (that's OUR opinion anyways) we have been discussing it. The problem is that the prices aren't very "indie" friendly... the costs of doing BD are astronomical for a little company like us to jump in without sweating the costs a bit.

Perhaps, soon, the prices will go down and be more favorable to companies that have more limited distribution (like us).

But, right now, we have no plans. But that could change any day if we get a company to do a quality encode and authoring for us at a decent price.
Kindest Regards,

Don May, Jr. - President, Synapse Films
http://www.synapse-films.com

#19 of 23 MarkHarrison

MarkHarrison

    Supporting Actor

  • 597 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 14 2002

Posted January 09 2008 - 07:45 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by JulianK
I believe it's Disney that has the issues with porn duplication, not Sony.

Disney will simply not allow their product to be pressed on lines that are also used for porn. Period.

That's not an unreasonable requirement. Though unlikely, if there was a mishap where a porn disc got Disney artwork and packaged in a Disney case, it could get them a big lawsuit. I've heard of DVDs have the wrong artwork stamped on them before, so it could happen.

#20 of 23 Jesse Skeen

Jesse Skeen

    Producer

  • 3,996 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 24 1999

Posted January 09 2008 - 08:26 AM

Image Entertainment, which started out putting porno movies out on laserdisc and was actually started by a few people in the porn business, had to stop issuing adult titles when they started distributing Disney. They then created a spin-off company called LaserDisc Entertainment to issue porn.
Home video oddities, old commercials and other junk: http://www.youtube.com/user/eyeh8nbc


Back to Blu-ray



Forum Nav Content I Follow