Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Photo
- - - - -

'Live Free or Die Hard' Not Unrated on Blu-ray


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
52 replies to this topic

#1 of 53 OFFLINE   John Kwong

John Kwong

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 83 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 01 2001

Posted September 05 2007 - 05:32 PM


http://dvd.themanroo...ew.php?id=00702

Did anyone else read anything about this?

#2 of 53 ONLINE   Brandon Conway

Brandon Conway

    captveg



  • 7,624 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 30 2002
  • Real Name:Brandon Conway
  • LocationNorth Hollywood, CA

Posted September 05 2007 - 08:07 PM

I saw the news earlier today. It's a mild disappointment. The PG-13 theatrical cut was something I was more than ready to purchase. It'll be interesting to see what the differences in the Unrated version are. My guess is that this is about 95% marketing gimmick and 5% director's intent.

"And now the reprimand, from an American critic. He reproaches me for using film as a sacred & lasting medium, like a painting or a book. He does not believe that filmmaking is an inferior art, but he believes, and quite rightly, that a reel goes quickly, that the public are looking above all for relaxation, that film is fragile and that it is pretentious to express the power of one's soul by such ephemeral and delicate means, that Charlie Chaplin's or Buster Keaton's first films can only be seen on very rare and badly spoiled prints. I add that the cinema is making daily progress and that eventually films that we consider marvelous today will soon be forgotten because of new dimensions & colour. This is true. But for 4 weeks this film [The Blood of a Poet] has been shown to audiences that have been so attentive, so eager & so warm, that I wonder after all there is not an anonymous public who are looking for more than relaxation in the cinema." - Jean Cocteau, 1932


#3 of 53 OFFLINE   Jim_K

Jim_K

    Executive Producer



  • 10,090 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 07 2000

Posted September 05 2007 - 10:58 PM

This is annoying to the point where I might just rent this instead. Really, we're paying premium prices for these HD formats and to get shortchanged with content compared to the DVD version doesn't make any sense. The majority of extras I can live without but having multiple versions via seemless branching is a big selling point for me. WTF Fox?!
Death before Streaming!


#4 of 53 OFFLINE   Shawn.F

Shawn.F

    Supporting Actor



  • 561 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 16 2005

Posted September 05 2007 - 11:07 PM

Eh, I'll just rent the unrated on SD and see if there is a major difference between that and the theatrical cut. We've all been burned by so-called 'Unrated' cuts before, this one might be no exception. That said, this is a perplexing move by Fox Home Video. I would love to hear the reason behind this.

#5 of 53 OFFLINE   Paul Arnette

Paul Arnette

    Screenwriter



  • 2,616 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 16 2002

Posted September 06 2007 - 01:50 AM

Since I haven't seen this film yet anyway, this is exactly what I plan to do. I'm still debating whether or not I want to spring for the Die Hard Trilogy box set and take the time to sell 2 and 3 individual.
Universal Blu-ray Discs I will not be buying while they're offered only as Blu-ray + DVD 'flipper' discs:

The Jackal
, Out of Africa, and Traffic.

#6 of 53 OFFLINE   BrettB

BrettB

    Producer



  • 3,024 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 01 2001

Posted September 06 2007 - 03:01 AM

The whole 'unrated on home video' phenomenon of late is incredibly lame. That said, it should be on the BD. Obviously a double-dip situation. Which is also lame.

#7 of 53 OFFLINE   WillG

WillG

    Producer



  • 5,237 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 30 2003

Posted September 06 2007 - 03:35 AM

The only thing I can think of is that they want to try to get you to buy this on both BD and DVD. That may sound a bit conspiracy theorist, but is it much different that the one disc version of a film for R1 and two discs for other regions only for a double dip of the two disc months later strategy that Fox likes to use. Not to mention all the other studio double dips. I don't know. I wanted to get this on BD, but why should I if they are only going to have the PG-13 available which no one really wanted for a Die Hard film anyway?
STOP HIM! He's supposed to die!

#8 of 53 OFFLINE   Neil Joseph

Neil Joseph

    Lead Actor



  • 8,341 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 16 1998
  • Real Name:Neil Joseph

Posted September 06 2007 - 03:42 AM

One cannot understand the logic with this decision. That said, I enjoyed the theatrical version and will purchase that and will not double dip on any future releases of this title. What they should have done is provide both versions on the same disks and make use of the technology that has been available for some time.
Click and enter " T H E . H O L O D E C K "
---------------------------------------------------------
My Home Theatre "The Holodeck"

 


#9 of 53 OFFLINE   Robert Crawford

Robert Crawford

    Moderator



  • 25,899 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 09 1998
  • Real Name:Robert
  • LocationMichigan

Posted September 06 2007 - 04:24 AM

Yep, it was the version I've enjoyed in the movie theater and I'm not going to repurchase a longer version down the road just to hear a couple of curse words or to see a little more blood. Crawdaddy

Crawdaddy

 

Blu-ray Preorder Listing

 


#10 of 53 OFFLINE   Chuck West

Chuck West

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 200 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 21 2002

Posted September 06 2007 - 04:47 AM

I'm not double dipping. I'll wait for the unrated BD release.

#11 of 53 OFFLINE   Doug Schiller

Doug Schiller

    Supporting Actor



  • 767 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 16 1998

Posted September 06 2007 - 06:31 AM

I'm with you if they tried to add curse words and blood. But, in this case, they removed them to get a certain rating. I want to buy the originally intended version, not some studio mandated cut. This is a no buy for me.

#12 of 53 OFFLINE   DavidJ

DavidJ

    Screenwriter



  • 2,702 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 23 2001
  • Real Name:David

Posted September 06 2007 - 07:14 AM

I'm probably in the minority here, but I'm glad it is the pg-13 theatrical version. I actually appreciate there being less cursing and I enjoyed the film in the theaters.

#13 of 53 OFFLINE   Brent M

Brent M

    Producer



  • 4,486 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 15 2001

Posted September 06 2007 - 07:33 AM

Pitiful decision by Fox. There's more than enough space to put both cuts on the Blu-Ray version, but they're simply choosing not to so they can "double dip" on this title in a few months. Instead of a potential Blu-Ray purchase they'll get an Unrated DVD rental from me and that's it. Posted Image
"If you're good at something, never do it for free."

#14 of 53 OFFLINE   Dave Mack

Dave Mack

    Producer



  • 4,665 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 28 2002

Posted September 06 2007 - 07:46 AM

I'm sure a double dip is planned. I'll be waiting too.

#15 of 53 OFFLINE   MatthewA

MatthewA

    Lead Actor



  • 6,598 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000
  • Real Name:Matthew
  • LocationSalinas, CA

Posted September 06 2007 - 07:47 AM

Two words: seamless branching.

I wonder if they want this format to succeed at all. Maybe Toshiba paid them off to make stupid release decisions like this on BD. Posted Image

Enough is enough, Disney. No more evasions or excuses. We DEMAND the release Song of the South on Blu-ray along with the uncut version of Bedknobs and Broomsticks on Blu-ray. I am going to boycott The Walt Disney Company until then. And while you're at it, PLEASE stop dropping DVD/laserdisc extras from Blu-ray releases of other films.


#16 of 53 OFFLINE   Paul Arnette

Paul Arnette

    Screenwriter



  • 2,616 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 16 2002

Posted September 06 2007 - 08:25 AM

Live Unrated or Rent Hard! Posted Image
Universal Blu-ray Discs I will not be buying while they're offered only as Blu-ray + DVD 'flipper' discs:

The Jackal
, Out of Africa, and Traffic.

#17 of 53 OFFLINE   Dan Hinson

Dan Hinson

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 113 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 13 2002
  • Real Name:Dan Hinson
  • LocationTennessee

Posted September 06 2007 - 08:27 AM

I had heard they edited out the “Yippee-ki-yay” line for the theatrical release. Is that so?
“I don't think I'm alone in the world in imagining this flick may be the worst idea since Greedo shooting first.” - Ben Affleck as Holden McNeil in 'Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back.'

#18 of 53 OFFLINE   Craig_Ehr

Craig_Ehr

    Second Unit



  • 329 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 15 2002

Posted September 06 2007 - 08:43 AM

I would tend to agree, except that this movie wasn't originally intended to be PG-13. Unfortunately, the lip-flap and premature/sloppy edits are too distracting in the theatrical cut - I picked up on it upon my first viewing at the cinema. I'm not saying an unrated cut will make this title an any better or worse film, but hopefully I won't be taken out of the movie experience by clumsy work in post. PG-13 cut = no $ale for me, regretably.

#19 of 53 OFFLINE   Craig_Ehr

Craig_Ehr

    Second Unit



  • 329 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 15 2002

Posted September 06 2007 - 08:47 AM



#20 of 53 ONLINE   Brandon Conway

Brandon Conway

    captveg



  • 7,624 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 30 2002
  • Real Name:Brandon Conway
  • LocationNorth Hollywood, CA

Posted September 06 2007 - 09:16 AM

The thing is, they could have still got a PG-13 even if they didn't "obfuscate" those two syllables, because it's the only time in the film that word is "said".

"And now the reprimand, from an American critic. He reproaches me for using film as a sacred & lasting medium, like a painting or a book. He does not believe that filmmaking is an inferior art, but he believes, and quite rightly, that a reel goes quickly, that the public are looking above all for relaxation, that film is fragile and that it is pretentious to express the power of one's soul by such ephemeral and delicate means, that Charlie Chaplin's or Buster Keaton's first films can only be seen on very rare and badly spoiled prints. I add that the cinema is making daily progress and that eventually films that we consider marvelous today will soon be forgotten because of new dimensions & colour. This is true. But for 4 weeks this film [The Blood of a Poet] has been shown to audiences that have been so attentive, so eager & so warm, that I wonder after all there is not an anonymous public who are looking for more than relaxation in the cinema." - Jean Cocteau, 1932





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users