Jump to content



Sign up for a free account!

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests to win things like this Logitech Harmony Ultimate Remote and you won't get the popup ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

The Sentinel: No reviews and it opens Friday. Not a good sign.


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
17 replies to this topic

#1 of 18 Cassy_w

Cassy_w

    Second Unit

  • 459 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 02 2003

Posted April 17 2006 - 12:39 PM

Michael Douglas is fast having a lot in common with Harrison Ford. This movie opens in 4 days and yet not a single review over at Rotten Tomatoes. Not good.

The story is interesting and the commercials make it look good, but that doesn't mean anything.
Death to PG-13! And now death to DVNR too!!

#2 of 18 Jason Harbaugh

Jason Harbaugh

    Screenwriter

  • 2,968 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 30 2001

Posted April 17 2006 - 12:59 PM

Has it been screened yet?

I am looking forward to it reguardless.

#3 of 18 Shawn_KE

Shawn_KE

    Screenwriter

  • 1,295 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 25 2003

Posted April 17 2006 - 01:04 PM

Looks like a tv movie to me.

#4 of 18 Rob P S

Rob P S

    Screenwriter

  • 1,991 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 22 2002

Posted April 17 2006 - 02:48 PM

James Berardinelli's review will be out on Thursday.

#5 of 18 Shawn.F

Shawn.F

    Supporting Actor

  • 561 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 16 2005

Posted April 21 2006 - 06:55 AM

I saw this at a screening on Tuesday night. It was terrible. Take "The Fugitive", "In the Line Of Fire" and elements of "24" (the casting of Kiefer notwithstanding), strip them of quality and you have a film that is a predictable, boring and silly mess. Avoid, folks, avoid.

#6 of 18 Brett_M

Brett_M

    Screenwriter

  • 1,304 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 18 2004
  • Real Name:Brett Meyer
  • LocationMos Eisley Spaceport

Posted April 22 2006 - 01:31 PM

Here's my review: Eva Longoria is hot and the movie sucked.

The premise does not make sense. It is simply stupid.
Many Shubs and Zuuls knew what it meant to roast in the depths of the Sloar that day I can tell you.

#7 of 18 Patrick Sun

Patrick Sun

    Studio Mogul

  • 37,625 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 30 1999

Posted April 22 2006 - 02:50 PM

Well, I thought the film was too short in the character development department, and the middle act is just unbelievably underwritten, but the last act was okay. I picked up the traitor pretty early, but it doesn't really matter for this sort of genre, I guess. For a 2 hour popcorn flick, it did an average job.

So, I give it 2 stars or a grade of C.
"Jee-sus, it's like Iwo Jima out there" - Roger Sterling on "Mad Men"
Patcave | 2006 Films | 2007 Films | Flickr | Comic-Con 2012 | Dragon*Con 2012

#8 of 18 Patrick_S

Patrick_S

    Screenwriter

  • 2,970 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 01 2000

Posted April 22 2006 - 05:46 PM

Just heard Ebert and Roeper's review, they gave it two thumbs up.
I'll probably catch this one later in the week.

#9 of 18 Jason Guardiano

Jason Guardiano

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 136 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 06 2001

Posted April 22 2006 - 08:54 PM

I fell asleep during this one and missed the climax.. Just saw it for Kiefer.

"Posted Image it's alright" rating
Out of college..
The Beatles - You Never Give Me Your Money

#10 of 18 Brent M

Brent M

    Producer

  • 4,486 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 15 2001

Posted April 23 2006 - 06:42 AM

A lot of reviews said it wasn't even good enough to be an episode of "24". I'll definitely be waiting for the DVD on this one.
"If you're good at something, never do it for free."

#11 of 18 Tim Glover

Tim Glover

    Lead Actor

  • 7,629 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 12 1999
  • Real Name:Tim Glover

Posted September 17 2006 - 04:30 PM

I rented it today...recovering from a kidney stone. (ouch) Posted Image

Not bad, but could have been so much better. Not the same film for sure, but In The Line Of Fire is WAY better. Way better. This one needed something and not really sure how to describe it. Felt rushed? Thin at times, and then it got really good.


Overall, I give it a

7/10. Generous but I'm on drugs. Posted Image

#12 of 18 Jason Harbaugh

Jason Harbaugh

    Screenwriter

  • 2,968 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 30 2001

Posted September 17 2006 - 07:01 PM

Felt like a made for TV movie. A decent one, but low production values.

#13 of 18 Eric Carl

Eric Carl

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 74 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 13 2005

Posted September 18 2006 - 03:17 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Harbaugh
Felt like a made for TV movie. A decent one, but low production values.

Nearly everything the director, Clark Johnson, has made, was done for TV.

I think the only other movie he is credited with is: SWAT.

I just checked and, yep, he has only done this and SWAT as features....more than likely, they are just Made for TV Action movies.

Anyways, he was pretty good on "Homicide: Life on the Street" as Meldrick Lewis...so his ability is more than likely limited to TV directing.....not that there is anything wrong with that.

#14 of 18 Larry Sutliff

Larry Sutliff

    Screenwriter

  • 2,853 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 17 2000

Posted September 18 2006 - 07:56 AM

I saw this at a friends house a couple of weeks ago. It was ok. It started well, but the finale was very anti-climactic. Good cast, though.

#15 of 18 Jason Harbaugh

Jason Harbaugh

    Screenwriter

  • 2,968 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 30 2001

Posted September 18 2006 - 08:06 AM

I thought SWAT felt more like a 'movie' than The Sentinel. Didn't know they were from the same director.

#16 of 18 Eric Carl

Eric Carl

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 74 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 13 2005

Posted September 19 2006 - 04:46 AM

Maybe, The Sentinel was made with a lower budget than SWAT because SWAT did not make good money.

So, maybe it feels like made for TV, because of the low budget. The fact that Clark Johnson is a TV director maybe points to the lack of creativity in his shots which leads you (and others) to feel that it is a TV movie.

Errrr......it should be pointed out that I have not seen this, yet, but I will grab it in a couple of months when the price drops, as the trailer grabbed my attention....regardless of what some critics, or reviewers, think of the movie itself. By that time, it may go on sale with Inside Man, which is a film I really enjoyed, so even if I disliked it, I would be getting it for about the price of a rental.

-Eric

#17 of 18 Ricardo C

Ricardo C

    Producer

  • 5,060 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 14 2002

Posted September 24 2006 - 12:53 PM

Saw it today (it just opened in theaters down here). I thought it was pretty good. Not the greatest thriller I've ever seen, but I enjoyed it. Some plot holes (Garrison wants to go through his buddy's computer to see what leads he was working on, and next scene he's found the terrorists' hideout?) but it was quite enjoyable.
Man, an hour wasted on this sig! Thanks, Toshiba! :P

#18 of 18 rodney_T

rodney_T

    Auditioning

  • 5 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 27 2006

Posted September 25 2006 - 02:51 PM

I saw this at a local cinema complex with a buddy after we won free tickets.

Glad they were free.