-

Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

THX, should I be impressed?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
11 replies to this topic

#1 of 12 OFFLINE   allan espinoza

allan espinoza

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 210 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 01 2002

Posted December 24 2004 - 02:29 AM

Well, I have a yamaha rx-v2500 that has THX select and utilizes the THX surround EX, but my high expectations were brought down after listening. The receiver is great and its sound to me is awesome, but when i select THX, the volume and tones seem to decrease and does not neccessarily have that great of a punch to it as oppose to it being in standard surround. I just got this receiver so im still playing with it to pull the best out of it, but I see myself not wanting to use THX. Could i be doing something wrong in the settings? According to the manual, THX has its own settings that it uses. I calibrated using yamaha's YPAO and it did a pretty good job of doing so. Has your THX experience been likewise? another, is THX best used only on dvd titles that have been THX certified? Is THX surround ex the same as 6.1, just in addition to the additional center rear?

#2 of 12 OFFLINE   John Garcia

John Garcia

    Executive Producer

  • 11,542 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 24 1999
  • Real Name:John
  • LocationNorCal

Posted December 24 2004 - 05:10 AM

I never use the THX processing on my receiver for the same reason. It tends to roll the highs off and makes everything sound flat compared to when it is not egaged, IMO. EX is intended to be used with EX material, but since it is matrix, it works for 5.1 as well.

It makes no difference if the film is THX cert or not.
HT: Emotiva UMC-200, Emotiva XPA-3, Carnegie Acoustics CSB-1s + CSC-1, GR Research A/V-1s, Epik Empire, Oppo BDP-105, PS4, PS3,URC R-50, APC-H10, Panamax 5100 Bluejeans Cable
System Two: Marantz PM7200, Pioneer FS52s, Panasonic BD79
(stolen) : Marantz SR-8300, GR Research A/V-2s, Sony SCD-222ES SACD, Panasonic BD-65, PS3 60G (250G)

Everybody is a genius, but if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it’ll spend its whole life believing that it is stupid.” – Albert Einstein

 


#3 of 12 OFFLINE   DerrikW

DerrikW

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 63 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 18 2003

Posted December 24 2004 - 01:14 PM

I never use THX processing either. Like John said, everything sounds too flat for me.

For me DD+PLIIx or dts+neo6 are more than enough to keep me happy.

#4 of 12 OFFLINE   allan espinoza

allan espinoza

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 210 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 01 2002

Posted December 24 2004 - 04:42 PM

well i was surely dissapointed with THX. I always thought of THX as being the best and its processing and for a long time I always wished to own a THX receiver, but now that i do, it's become more of a symbol than anything else. On THX website they claim that you have to own nothing but THX certified products including speakers and interconnects to bring its full potential. do you believe it's true?

#5 of 12 OFFLINE   Eddie Horton

Eddie Horton

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 237 posts
  • Join Date: May 23 2004

Posted December 25 2004 - 09:42 AM

I also don't like THX processing and don't believe that you have to own all THX certified products to max out your home theater experience.
Save the whales! Trade them for valuable prizes.

#6 of 12 OFFLINE   Lewis Besze

Lewis Besze

    Producer

  • 3,134 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 28 1999

Posted December 25 2004 - 01:52 PM

Allan, what you hear is the one THX's feature called RE-EQ,which used to be a good feature,when theatrical mixes were the norm on home video mainly on LD,and on many DVDs till recently.Most current releases are remixed to HT enviroment,some are call it "nearfield mix".
There is a good article that explains this:http://www.hometheat....es-6-2002.html


Some receivers let's you disengage this feature without affecting the rest of the THX processing,which can be beneficial IMO.

#7 of 12 OFFLINE   Jim Swantko

Jim Swantko

    Agent

  • 36 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 15 2004

Posted December 26 2004 - 02:34 AM

I agree - THX is a huge disappointment. I NEVER use mine - my processor stays in Logic 7. Posted Image

#8 of 12 OFFLINE   Leo Kerr

Leo Kerr

    Screenwriter

  • 1,699 posts
  • Join Date: May 10 1999

Posted December 26 2004 - 05:41 AM

THX probably should have stayed in the Theater program; that's where it probably made the most difference... at least when it worked. Basic standards such as how much noise bleed from neighboring theaters and how much air-handling noise were important improvements for many theaters, as well as a certain standard of equipment quality for the theater.

(If I recall, THX Theater Alignment did not specifically certify or require certified equipment; I think it required measurable and demonstrated performance.)

Leo Kerr

#9 of 12 OFFLINE   Christopher B

Christopher B

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 84 posts
  • Join Date: May 03 2004

Posted December 27 2004 - 04:59 AM

I never usually use THX on my Yamaha receiver either, I like the normal DD or DTS without the re-eq. If you read about THX it seems to me that it isn't necassarily supposed to make the sound drastically better, it is more about getting a consistant sound in any situation. The re-eq that rolls off the highs and has what they call timbre matching might be great if your system needs help to smooth things out and make the transition from one speaker to another more seamless. It seems to me that if you have a decent sytem and it is calibrated correctly, the re-eq takes away the crispness of the soundtrack. I believe the original idea in the theaters was to make sure that the theater met certain requirements with their system so that if you went to any theater that was THX certified, the sound should be the same as any other THX certified theater. With HT they tried to do the same thing.

#10 of 12 OFFLINE   Larry Sutliff

Larry Sutliff

    Screenwriter

  • 2,857 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 17 2000

Posted December 27 2004 - 05:43 AM

Back in the old Laserdisc days, many Dolby Surround tracks were very bright and they needed to be tamed in order to listen to them in the smaller enviroment of a home theater. Also, Pro Logic had a monaural surround track, so THX "de-correlated" the surround into a wider, more stereo like surround experience. With the advent of 5.1 sound, and better remastering of soundtracks on DVD's for home use, THX has become obsolete IMHO. But it still looks cool to see those letters emblazoned on a receiver!

#11 of 12 OFFLINE   JackS

JackS

    Supporting Actor

  • 634 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 17 2002

Posted December 27 2004 - 06:01 AM

It seems to me that the greatest accomplishment of THX comes with their software.
DVD's that have the logo almost guarantees a pristine sound quality that is often missing with non THX disks.
When buying a disk with the logo you are assured that an extra ordinary degree of engineering has been applied.
This is not to say that non-THX disks can't sound just as good but that in truth, they often don't.

#12 of 12 OFFLINE   Lewis Besze

Lewis Besze

    Producer

  • 3,134 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 28 1999

Posted December 27 2004 - 08:43 AM

Quote:
This is not to say that non-THX disks can't sound just as good but that in truth, they often don't.
Outside of Lucasfilm and some Disney releases there aren't many THX releases these days.Most of my "reference" discs are non THX certified.