Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo

VOD: The race is on!


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 of 7 OFFLINE   Trace Downing

Trace Downing

    Supporting Actor



  • 510 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 19 1999

Posted September 17 2001 - 03:48 AM

EDIT: Hey, could a MOD change my subject header from os to is? It was the one-armed man that did it.

This just came in from my intra-company newsletter today.

"CABLE OPERATORS RACING TO OFFER VIDEO-ON-DEMAND - [The Newark Star-Ledger, online.] Cable-TV operators around the country are making plans to boost their revenues by using a new technology that lets individual customers set the viewing schedule simply by punching a few buttons on a remote. It is called video-on-demand, and it has the potential to shake up the way Hollywood, cable operators, and video-rental chains do business in the future. The closest thing to it that the cable-viewing masses have right now is so-called pay-per-view programming. Comcast expects to charge $3.95 for relatively recent movies and $1.95 for so-called "library titles," the industry's marketing euphemism for older movies and television programs. A few hundred titles will be available initially, the company said. Comcast is testing its video-on-demand offerings and expects to market the service commercially by the end of the year. As with a video tape or DVD, customers can view an ordered movie as often as they want to during the 24-hour rental period. Unlike a rented video, there is nothing to return -- and no late fees. The server sends the movie as digitally encoded light pulses that travel over a fiber-optic network; unlike some other video-on-demand systems, Comcast's does not transmit video over the Internet. It should be some race: Everybody in the video entertainment business is looking at video-on-demand. "Video-on-demand is something we know customers are very interested in," said Tracy Baumgartner, a spokeswoman for AT&T Broadband, the cable-TV division of AT&T."

Well, I'm not "very interested in" it, so there. Posted Image

[Edited last by Trace Downing on September 17, 2001 at 10:52 AM]

#2 of 7 OFFLINE   george kaplan

george kaplan

    Executive Producer



  • 13,064 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 14 2001

Posted September 17 2001 - 10:39 AM

VOD would certainly not be a replacement for owning movies I want. I'll still buy those. It would only be a replacement for renting movies I haven't seen. But unless they offered me the same 5 day viewing I can get at Hollywood Video, my answer would be: zero interest.

------------------
13-time NBA world champion Lakers: 1949, 1950, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1972, 1980, 1982, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2000, 2001
"Movies should be like amusement parks. People should go to them to have fun." - Billy Wilder

"Subtitles good. Hollywood bad." - Tarzan, Sight & Sound 2012 voter.

"My films are not slices of life, they are pieces of cake." - Alfred Hitchcock"My great humility is just one of the many reasons that I...

#3 of 7 OFFLINE   cafink

cafink

    Producer



  • 3,043 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 1999

Posted September 17 2001 - 11:02 AM

I think it sounds awesome. My only problem with it is that I don't expect to see many movies presented in their OAR, in which case I guess I'll stick to rending DVDs.
 

 


#4 of 7 OFFLINE   Glenn Overholt

Glenn Overholt

    Producer



  • 4,207 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 24 1999

Posted September 17 2001 - 11:12 AM

I figured this would come around sooner or later. As for myself, I have never used PPV, so VOD is out for me too. I have no idea how popular they are, but with Blockbuster's sig on them, they are a no-no for me.

Glenn

#5 of 7 OFFLINE   Michael St. Clair

Michael St. Clair

    Producer



  • 6,009 posts
  • Join Date: May 03 1999

Posted September 17 2001 - 12:13 PM

Video-on-demand is likely to have the same picture quality as regular digital cable or DBS satellite.

Screw that!

#6 of 7 OFFLINE   Mike Voigt

Mike Voigt

    Supporting Actor



  • 806 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 30 1997

Posted September 17 2001 - 12:19 PM

Trace: done.

As for VOD, we'll have to see. If (IF!) the video quality is as good as DVD, then I can see folks using it with some regularity.

OTOH, if it is of any lesser qualities, then I think it will flop.

As with the old DIVX (spit), there is still the issue of someone having a database of the movies ordered. Something I do not care for.

Mike

#7 of 7 OFFLINE   David Lambert

David Lambert

    Executive Producer



  • 11,386 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 03 2001

Posted September 17 2001 - 01:15 PM

quote:
...there is still the issue of someone having a database of the movies ordered. Something I do not care for.[/quote]

Same as everytime you order from Amazon or any other on-line retailer. Same as when you use Best Buy's coupons that come to your mailbox with a barcode on them.

Same as anyone who uses the Kroger Plus card. Posted Image


Privacy. We take it for granted. This is one of the reasons why I buy at B&M's but toss out Best Buy's piddly little 10% coupons.

I want to own what I want to own and I don't want someone analyzing my purchases and trying to figure out things about what I may or may not like. If you "target" me with specialized marketing, how am I ever going to know that something else is out there? Besides, I rather get nothing in the way of junk mail at all, and using that stuff is tantamount to begging them, "Spam me".

------------------
DAVE/Memphis


Posted Image
[i]Did you want us to respect your cause? You just damned your cause.
Did you want to make us fear? You just steeled our resolve.
Did you want to tear us apart? You just brought us together.

http://www.miami.com....ocs/000565.htm
[ /i]




[Edited last by David Lambert on September 17, 2001 at 08:15 PM]
DAVE/Memphis, TN

...Want to see your favorite show on DVD?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users