Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

57 is too big! now what :(


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 of 23 OFFLINE   Jason_HA

Jason_HA

    Auditioning



  • 8 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 09 2003

Posted April 14 2003 - 03:42 PM

Just had my 57 inch HDTV (Toshiba 57H82)delivered today and though it looked perfect in the store, and I thought I measured correctly but it just seems to big for my living room. The picture itself does not seem too big, but just to close if you can understand what I mean. My living room is about 11' across, and from the wall to the edge of the couch is 8'. So my question is would me downgrading to a 50inch be the best bet, or would I have to go all the way down to a 42inch? I like the big picture, but it just seems to close. I do want to stick with a HDTV 16:9 though no matter what. HELP!!! Thanks, Jason

#2 of 23 OFFLINE   Phil L

Phil L

    Supporting Actor



  • 784 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 27 1998

Posted April 14 2003 - 04:17 PM

Give it a few days. RPTVs seem to shrink. Mine at first seemed huge and now I wish it was bigger.

#3 of 23 OFFLINE   Tim Hess

Tim Hess

    Second Unit



  • 333 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 02 2001

Posted April 14 2003 - 04:36 PM

Phil gave great advice. Watch it for a week or two (depending on your return policy), make sure you watch your favorite films, then decide!

My 47" seemed too small after the first month Posted Image

#4 of 23 OFFLINE   Chris Hovanic

Chris Hovanic

    Supporting Actor



  • 545 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 03 2003

Posted April 14 2003 - 05:07 PM

Roger that on the too small syndrome. Posted Image

My 57" looked huge when I got it home a month ago (upgraded fro a whoping 27"). The wife kept saying "Its going to be too big, lets get the 50"!" I stood strong and now she is a happy camper.

I would have gone with the 65" if I had the room for it (I have a built in nook for the TV and 65" was about 3" too wide)

Like the others have said give it a week or two and then make up your mind.
Chris Hovanic
"Go away or I'll replace you with a very small shell script!" :wink:

My DVD Collection
My Home Theater Pictures

#5 of 23 OFFLINE   Jason_HA

Jason_HA

    Auditioning



  • 8 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 09 2003

Posted April 14 2003 - 11:43 PM

Then I guess my next question is how far away from your TV do you sit? Like I said above I have a 57inch now and the couch is about 5 feet away from it right now. It just seems to be too close. I bought it at best buy, so I have 30 days to return it I believe. I will give it a few days and see what happens. But generally how far away do people sit from a 57inch? And if I did go smaller, how small would I need to go considering I sit 5feet away? Thanks again, Jason

#6 of 23 OFFLINE   Jason Caudill

Jason Caudill

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 155 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 07 2001

Posted April 15 2003 - 12:02 AM

Go down to the 50". Your salesperson should not have sold you a 57" with 5' of viewing disatnce. Did they even ask? At Best Buy probably not. You need more like 10' (or more) for a set of that size. I doubt you will be happy with that set in the long run. Jason

#7 of 23 OFFLINE   Jeff Gatie

Jeff Gatie

    Lead Actor



  • 6,531 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 19 2002

Posted April 15 2003 - 01:35 AM

I have a 56" in a 11 ft. room. Viewing distance about 7 ft. to my eyeball. This is perfect for me, but if I lean forward too much I begin to distinguish scanlines and the picture degrades. If you are truly only 5 ft. screen to eyeball, swap it for the 50. If you are 7 ft. or more screen to eyeball, keep it. I too thought it was huge at first, but that goes away real fast and I would have deeply regretted downsizing. As long as you cannot distinguish individual scanlines on anamorphic DVDs, keep it or you will regret it too. Note: Do not judge the TV by analog or "digital" cable. These are usually so bad, you'll end up down to a 27 inch. Judge it by HDTV or anamorphic DVD content only. Cable/satellite will go to HD sometime in the future and you do not want to judge your tv with the lowest quality signal that is on it's way out.

#8 of 23 OFFLINE   Hanson

Hanson

    Producer



  • 4,560 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 01 1998
  • Real Name:Hanson

Posted April 15 2003 - 01:36 AM

Are you too close like you see scanlines, too close that the picture looks blurry, or are you too close like you feel claustrophobic? The first shouldn't be an issue with HD sets, the second can be somewhat alleviated by calibrating your set (esp. convergence, but GIGO is GIGO) and the third requires counseling ;-) I have a 53" sit and I set 7' away. I mean, yeah it seemed huge when I first got it, but now it's normal. In fact, now I wish I went up to 65". I concur with the others -- see if you get used to it before exchanging it.

#9 of 23 OFFLINE   Tim Hess

Tim Hess

    Second Unit



  • 333 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 02 2001

Posted April 15 2003 - 05:19 AM

We sit around 8-9' away from the 47". I've been moving us a bit closer each week to find the sweet spot between viewing and listening.

#10 of 23 OFFLINE   Jason_HA

Jason_HA

    Auditioning



  • 8 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 09 2003

Posted April 15 2003 - 10:29 AM

Thanks again for all the responses! To answer a few questions from above, the picture is not bad at all. And if it is distance to my actual eye, it is closer to 7 feet I guess. The very front of my couch is about 5.5 feet from the TV screen. But like I said, it is not the picture resolution that is bad, but that feeling that "this TV is too HUGE!". It looks massive in our living room (and the girlfriend is having a fit, which I find funny). If it only didn't stick out from the wall so much, but I guess all projection sets are about 2 feet deep. I will watch it for about a week, and then decide. How much of a difference would a 50inch make? This is my major question. Many thanks again to all, Jason

#11 of 23 OFFLINE   ManW_TheUncool

ManW_TheUncool

    Producer



  • 5,882 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 18 2001
  • Real Name:ManW

Posted April 15 2003 - 11:14 AM

If you're just concerned about it sticking out, I suspect going down to a 50" won't help that much. You'll probably only shave off 3" or so in depth and maybe 5" in width.

Maybe the answer is to get bigger, full range speakers and align them on the same plane as the front of the TV, instead of against the back wall. I'm assuming you have small speakers w/ recessed positioning of course.

In my setup w/ a 53", you don't really feel like the TV's sticking out from the wall that much because it's not just the TV. Posted Image Of course, I do have more room to work w/. FWIW, I prefer ~8ft eyes-to-screen for my 53".

Can't you shift the room around so the TV's along a shorter/narrower wall perhaps? If your room is very long, but narrow, you might even consider positioning the TV somewhere in the middle and put up a screen behind it to effectively partition the room into an HT area and whatever else.

_Man_

Just another amateur learning to paint w/ "the light of the world".

"Whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is of good repute, if there is any excellence and if anything worthy of praise, dwell on these things..." (Apostle Paul)


#12 of 23 OFFLINE   Joe6pack99

Joe6pack99

    Second Unit



  • 441 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 06 2000

Posted April 15 2003 - 01:31 PM

I say keep it....i got a 65inch and at first thought the same thing....viewable distance from screen only bout 8 ft back but after a few days i was happy with it. Now after 2 months my once HUGE 65inch seems small to me ugh.

#13 of 23 OFFLINE   Jason_HA

Jason_HA

    Auditioning



  • 8 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 09 2003

Posted April 16 2003 - 12:33 AM

Sadly with how the room is set up I cannot change it around. I am going to give it about a week and see. The sad thing is that I talked the guy at Best Buy down to selling me the set for $1900 instead of the $2199 that it was priced at. If I did return it for the 50 inch Tosh (same model 50H82) that set is selling for $1800.

So it seems silly to get a smaller set for the same price. After 2 days, the set is shrinking, but still huge Posted Image

Jason

#14 of 23 OFFLINE   DavidAM

DavidAM

    Second Unit



  • 377 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 30 2001

Posted April 16 2003 - 02:31 AM

From the screen to my eye I am 7' away from my 56" widescreen and its perfect. Like everyone else, the TV was huge when I got it, but now its not a big deal.
Gamertag = Ferguson77

#15 of 23 OFFLINE   Paul_Fisher

Paul_Fisher

    Screenwriter



  • 1,222 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 27 2001

Posted April 16 2003 - 02:48 AM

[quote] Now after 2 months my once HUGE 65inch seems small to me ugh. [quote]

You're spoiled. Posted Image

#16 of 23 OFFLINE   BobRoulier

BobRoulier

    Second Unit



  • 348 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 16 2002

Posted April 16 2003 - 11:46 AM

I started with a 55" thought it was to big after a month returned it for a 65" and I said to my self wow thats big! 6 months later I sold it to a friend and now 123" is perfect!Posted Image


go biggggggg!!!!



Bob

#17 of 23 OFFLINE   Joe6pack99

Joe6pack99

    Second Unit



  • 441 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 06 2000

Posted April 16 2003 - 03:41 PM

LOL see i am not spoiled Posted Image

#18 of 23 OFFLINE   Leif Wall

Leif Wall

    Second Unit



  • 405 posts
  • Join Date: May 04 2000

Posted April 16 2003 - 04:48 PM

This happened when I bought my 32" direct view. It looked massive, then after awhile it seemed tiny. Now I've got a 53" widescreen and it's turned out the same way. At about 6-8ft it seems just right. Wish I woulda saved up for that 65" Toshiba. Wonder how hard it would be to get that in an apartment....

#19 of 23 OFFLINE   ManW_TheUncool

ManW_TheUncool

    Producer



  • 5,882 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 18 2001
  • Real Name:ManW

Posted April 16 2003 - 06:34 PM

Hmmm... Jason, if the $$$ is not a big obstacle, have you considered going w/ a digital FP system instead? That would solve the room vs TV size problem although I have no idea whether the requirement of dark viewing environment and the cost of the bulbs will be a problem for you. If you can still use a smaller direct-view for casual TV viewing, then this might be the way to go. _Man_

Just another amateur learning to paint w/ "the light of the world".

"Whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is of good repute, if there is any excellence and if anything worthy of praise, dwell on these things..." (Apostle Paul)


#20 of 23 OFFLINE   DerrickW

DerrickW

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 177 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 26 2003

Posted April 17 2003 - 05:16 PM

I don't think this has been mentioned yet, but the material you are watching is an important part of this as well. For standard definition over the air or cable, you'll want a smaller set or to be seated further away. But with HDTV or even DVD you'll have greater tolerance for sitting up close. With that said, 5.5' is really close! Who has links to the multiple distance/size calculators and spreadsheets I've seen before?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users