1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

Will DVD-Audio Survive

Discussion in 'Archived Threads 2001-2004' started by TrevorST, Jan 16, 2003.

  1. TrevorST

    TrevorST Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was in a large local Music Store today looking for a couple of DVD-Audio discs and there were a couple of people behind the counter and one guy in front talking to them. Well I asked where their DVD-Audio section was and they said they didn't have one. Then the guy talking to them jumped in and said he was a rep for a recording company and they were backing of DVD-Audio in favor of SACD.

    We got in a conversation and he said they were going with SACD because of the backward compatibility with existing CD players and people were not buying the DVD-Audio titles. I hope this is not the case because I love the sound from the DVD-A discs. I picked up a Panasonic 72 for the PQ and bought one DVD-A just to try it out, WOW I was sold. When I said why, when DVD-A is so much better than SACD he brought up the BETA v VHS story, where a superior technology is pushed out of the picture because of software availability.

    If anyone wants to hear what DVD-A can be then pick up the Fleetwood Mac Rumours disc. I remember listening to this when it first came out in the late 70's and it never sounded like this.
     
  2. James RD

    James RD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2001
    Messages:
    788
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's interesting, but what makes you think DVD-A is superior?
     
  3. TrevorST

    TrevorST Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just listen..... That is the best way.
     
  4. Kevin C Brown

    Kevin C Brown Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2000
    Messages:
    5,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    I wonder where Lee Scoggins is at! [​IMG]
    My impressions is: that purely from a technological standpoint, SACD has the edge.
    But.
    It really has to do with how the mastering was done. And in reality, both DVD-A and SACD *should* be better enough than CD that the difference between them is negligable.
    But in direct answer to the question:
     
  5. TrevorST

    TrevorST Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    Kevin,
    You got my interest with your comments.. Please explain how SACD is better from a technological point of view. It has much less bandwidth to work with so by it's very nature can not contain the same amount of detail as DVD-A.
     
  6. Tomoko Noguchi

    Tomoko Noguchi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2000
    Messages:
    461
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trevor,

    Have you even listened to a SACD? Indications by your post suggest that you haven't.
     
  7. TrevorST

    TrevorST Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have listened to SACD but not in my own environment I must admit. have you ever listened to DVD-A ???
     
  8. Cary P

    Cary P Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2000
    Messages:
    124
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have both SACD (Sony SCD 333ES) and DVD-Audio (Toshiba SD9200) in my system and greatly prefer SACD.

    Cary
     
  9. EdD

    EdD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1997
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Look here here for some technical info.
     
  10. KevinJ

    KevinJ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2001
    Messages:
    559
    Likes Received:
    1
    dvd-a's going to have a cd layer added sometime in the future btw so i'd say it's survival while not guarnateed is at least given a better chance with that development
     
  11. Lee Scoggins

    Lee Scoggins Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2001
    Messages:
    6,396
    Likes Received:
    0
    Real Name:
    Lee
     
  12. Iver

    Iver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    324
    Likes Received:
    0
    Right now, neither of the formats are exactly exploding in popularity.

    Many people already find CD's expensive at $15 each (even accounting for the $20 we're supposed to get back now that the music outlets and record companies have been found guilty of price-fixing). There's not what you could call a clamor for $25 discs.

    Unless the record companies severely cut the prices of the new high-rez discs, I would be readily willing to bet that five years from now you will find very little difference from the current situation: most music will still be on CD; and most stores won't even sell DVD-A and SACD discs.

    Before the high-rez audio lovers flame me, I appreciate that those who have gone out and purchased DVD-A or SACD decks are naturally excited about the boost in audio quality they can get with the new discs. I have nothing against high-quality audio reproduction.

    What I do object to is the electronics and music marketers thinking that we're all going to march out like robots and pay 40% more to be part of the onward march towards the latest and greatest.

    What they have forgotten is that people need a reason to upgrade. A new technology must solve a problem in order to gain popularity.

    For example, it used to drive me crazy that I couldn't read the music credits (always in the smallest type size) in movie credits on VHS tape. That made me very eager to move up to DVD. In other words, DVD solved a problem: the relatively low resolution of VHS tape.

    But to my way of thinking, there's too much of a "technology for technology's sake" aspect to the high-rez audio formats. The audio quality of CD just isn't that terrible that every time somebody plays a disc they're thinking to themselves: "Boy, I would pay just about anything to get better audio quality than I'm getting from this CD."
     
  13. Jagan Seshadri

    Jagan Seshadri Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2001
    Messages:
    530
    Likes Received:
    0
    Will DVD-Audio survive? Maybe, but here's where SACD is beating DVD-Audio:

    A simple user interface.

    SACDs are like CDs. No funky menu system. No "Groups". No "Why don't I get track 4 when I press 4 on my remote" problems.
    Just load and play.

    Why do you think those Macintosh "Switch" campaigns are proving popular? Same reason - simple user interface.

    Then again, how will any of these formats survive when the MP3 and the iPod are so popular? That is the real question...

    -JNS
     
  14. Kevin C Brown

    Kevin C Brown Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2000
    Messages:
    5,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good point. I do *not* like having to fire my TV up just to play a DVD-*AUDIO* disc.

    Maybe I should rephrase my statement: I *hope* at least one of them survives.

    Both of them could use a lesson in Marketing, 101.
     
  15. Philip Hamm

    Philip Hamm Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 1999
    Messages:
    6,888
    Likes Received:
    2
    Wow so much disinformation on this thread it's almost funny. Definitely proof that lots of people are misinformed.

    Re: Technological Edge. Neither has an edge over the other. There are definite arguments for and against both formats. How much weight one places in these different arguments determines which one is "better". I've auditioned both since I have both players in my house. They both sound stunning, better than CD. How much better and the importance of that difference is highly debatable.

    Re: High prices. The prices aren't really much higher than regular CDs. Most are about the same.

    Re: Hybrids. They are coming for DVD-Audio. They are slightly problematic for SACD (don't play in many DVD-ROMs or DVD players).

    Re: People thinking either of these are going to replace CD as a mainstream music format. Ain't gonna happen. CDs are fine for everyone but audiophiles.
     
  16. KeithH

    KeithH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2000
    Messages:
    9,427
    Likes Received:
    0
    DVD-Audio is sputtering at this point due to a dearth of quality software coming to the marketplace. We just keep waiting and waiting and waiting for a software explosion there.

    I agree that SACD is far more user friendly, and I prefer SACD over DVD-Audio for that reason. In my experience, SACD also sounds better, but I have not been in a position to properly compare the two formats. For one thing, I have no recordings that are common to the two formats. Furthermore, I feel that my SACD players (Sony ES models) are better audio components than my DVD-Audio player (Technics DVD-A10). Given all of this, DVD-Audio in my system easily beats CD.

    Both formats have technical merit, and given the label alliances to the two formats, I hope they both survive. My fear is that one format will die and the labels that supported the dead format, feeling burned by high-resolution music, will not jump over to the other format. As an example, given Warner's half-hearted support of DVD-Audio, if DVD-Audio were to die tomorrow, I am afraid that they would not jump over to SACD. Part of that decision might stem from an inability to swallow their pride and another part of that decision might stem from a feeling that CD is still king. Warner has a lot of great artists under its umbrella (e.g., Madonna, Prince, and Dire Straits), and I feel that DVD-Audio is our only chance to see these artists come to the world of high resolution. So, let's hope DVD-Audio doesn't die. One can easily make the same argument about SACD.
     
  17. Scott Merryfield

    Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 1998
    Messages:
    11,446
    Likes Received:
    651
    Location:
    Michigan
    I do not see either format becoming mainstream, either, for several reasons. (1) On most systems, the average music listener will not be able to notice enough of a difference between CDs and hi-res music. By most systems, I mean what the majority of people listen to music on -- boomboxes, shelf systems, stock car audio systems, Walkmen, etc. (2) The growing popularity of MP3, with its portability advantages despite its audible inferiority to CDs, indicates that many people are not looking for something better than CD.

    I have both DVD-A and SACD in my system. Both sound wonderful, and both are an audible improvement over CD. I do prefer SACD for ergonomic reasons -- its simpler interface, no need for a video monitor (yes, you can play DVD-A without a monitor, but selecting different audio tracks can be cumbersome without one), and the fact that I have a 5-disc SACD player but only a single-disc DVD-A player (yes, that only pertains to my system, I realize).

    Even though I have both formats in my main system, I have no desire to add playback capabilities for either to my car or other audio systems in my home. Redbook CD works fine in those environments for my needs, as I imagine it will for most music listeners.
     
  18. KeithH

    KeithH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2000
    Messages:
    9,427
    Likes Received:
    0
    Scott said:

     
  19. Wade Shapiro

    Wade Shapiro Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  20. StaceyS

    StaceyS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2000
    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    0
    DVD-A had a big showing at the LVCC N. and LVCC S. during CES. They were in car audio players, portables, and PCs, along with STBs.
     

Share This Page