1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

Moving on to Tripods (attention Scott Merryfield)

Discussion in 'Photography' started by Ronald Epstein, Aug 3, 2010.

  1. Cameron Yee

    Cameron Yee Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    11,293
    Likes Received:
    506
    Location:
    Since 2006
    Real Name:
    Cameron Yee
    I have that one and find it quite usable and fluid, but with a Canon camcorder, not a DSLR.

    The issue I usually have with any budget video head is the ability (or lack thereof) to balance the camcorder, so I don't have to constantly keep it from tipping back. That tension wears on the arms in short order. Ideally, you would just have things balanced so if you let go when it's at the horizontal position, it will just stay there. My workaround with the Canon M500 camcorder I use is to reverse the pan handle, so it's extending from the front, instead of the back. This provides enough counterbalance to the camera with the battery pack attached so it stays level without having to manually hold it there or tighten down the knobs.
     
  2. ManW_TheUncool

    ManW_TheUncool Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2001
    Messages:
    5,945
    Likes Received:
    30
    Real Name:
    ManW
    Hmmm... except when I'm using my Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 w/ its own tripod collar, the DSLR will be front heavy depending on what lens is on it. Maybe my 17-55 f/2.8, if not the Sigma f/2.8 telezoom (w/ its own mount)... though I might pick up an 18-140VR if I decide to get the D7100 in the near future. I do also still have the old 18-70 from my D70 days, but probably won't be using that for video -- not sure lens IS/VR helps all that much though.

    IF I go w/ D610, I might get the 24-85VR (FX). Not liking the D610's rather small AF area coverage though unless I shoot w/ DX crop -- more a concern wrt stills than video. What was/is Nikon thinking w/ that??? That plus some other niggles. Even the D800's AF coverage seems a bit limiting when shooting fullframe... making it a bit disappointing for the price -- that plus I really don't want to deal w/ 36MP(!) files... heck, not even sure I want to deal w/ 24MP, LOL... :P

    _Man_
     
  3. Sam Posten

    Sam Posten Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 1997
    Messages:
    19,983
    Likes Received:
    1,590
    Location:
    Aberdeen, MD & Navesink, NJ
    Real Name:
    Sam Posten
    And now we see why it was so cheap:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4J4fvzlGdEQ&feature=youtu.beBig changes, and welcome improvements, no regrets for me tho!
     
  4. ManW_TheUncool

    ManW_TheUncool Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2001
    Messages:
    5,945
    Likes Received:
    30
    Real Name:
    ManW
    Hmmm... That video doesn't really show off the fluid video head though... mostly just the legs.

    Wait. Are you saying the cheaper heads (like the ~$100 Manfrotto 128RC) actually bounce up and down during pans? How much bounce are we talking?

    I've been making do w/ my $150-200 Giottos 3300 ballhead for the occasional video shoot. Panning is possible, but a tad jerky just because I don't have an arm to do it consistently/reliably. Haven't noticed actual bounce w/ the pans as long as the camera's well-balanced and I turn the head itself, instead of touching the camera+lens -- this w/ the Sigma f/2.8 telezoom on its own tripod collar for instance.

    I would get the more expensive video head if I'm getting paid something for the shoots, but not sure my needs justify it at the moment. Actually, the relatively new, non-profit, local youth (classical/jazz) music (para-school?) program that my kids joined are looking to offer me modest freelance gigs to shoot-and-edit for their performances (4 or so per year). They only need DVD-quality results, and the modest(?) compensation would be plenty to help w/ upgrades and the better video head, maybe extra tripod, etc. -- that plus I'd love to help them out anyway... and I'd be shooting because of my kids anyway if they didn't have someone else do it (for the DVDs I'd gladly buy, instead of doing the work myself).

    In fact, shooting the kids' performances is a big consideration for me to suddenly consider buying a new DSLR -- futzing w/ the D5100 is getting old... plus would be nice to have 2 bodies to shoot videos (and then edit together), if I could...

    _Man_
     
  5. Johnny Angell

    Johnny Angell Played With Dinosaurs Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 1998
    Messages:
    5,785
    Likes Received:
    510
    Location:
    Central Arkansas
    Real Name:
    Johnny Angell
    Well crap! That tripod I was hoping to get for xmas, the wifey says get for my birthday. Back in December it was $150 and now it's $250. Here's the link to it: http://www.amazon.com/Vanguard-Alta-Pro-Aluminum-SBH-100/dp/B003WKOENO/ref=sr_1_1?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1386196252&sr=1-1&keywords=camera%20tripod&tag=viglink123527-20

    I have a built-in aversion to pay a $100 more for the same product. I used camelcamel to verify it was $150 in December. Maybe I'll ask for a rain check and wait for a xmas deal.
     
  6. Sam Posten

    Sam Posten Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 1997
    Messages:
    19,983
    Likes Received:
    1,590
    Location:
    Aberdeen, MD & Navesink, NJ
    Real Name:
    Sam Posten
    I want this, but for an iPhone!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CanJ3wfcG60&feature=youtu.be
     

Share This Page