1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

Excellent article in new 'Sight & Sound' on the art & science of Blu-Ray transfers

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Dortmunder, Nov 13, 2012.

  1. Dortmunder

    Dortmunder Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    4
    Written by Nick Wrigley, formerly of Masters of Cinema in the UK.
    A thrillingly interesting despatch ~
    Should be learned off by heart by every Blu-Ray producer in the business.
     
  2. JoeDoakes

    JoeDoakes Premium
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,347
    Likes Received:
    542
    Real Name:
    Ray
    Is this online anywhere? The print is really hard to see. thanks
     
  3. Dortmunder

    Dortmunder Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    4
    Haven't found it online yet, just PDF downloads, from which this screen grab was taken. Apologies for the quality, I sharpened it up as much as I could.
    I find if you right click and open in a new tab it's pretty legible, as opposed to just left clicking the image.
     
  4. Michel_Hafner

    Michel_Hafner Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2002
    Messages:
    952
    Likes Received:
    102
    It was about time such an article was written. Could have been from me 5 years ago. :cool:
    I remember I got quite worried as early as "Lord of the Rings 2" when DNR started to creep into digital cinema masters.
     
  5. BJQ1972

    BJQ1972 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2012
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    7
    Thanks for posting.
     
  6. bgart13

    bgart13 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,031
    Likes Received:
    143
    Real Name:
    Ben
    Excellent article. Done in a way lay people can understand. Cheers to Nick!
     
  7. Yorkshire

    Yorkshire Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    1,372
    Likes Received:
    302
    HERESY!
    :D
    Steve W
     
  8. Yorkshire

    Yorkshire Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    1,372
    Likes Received:
    302
    Surely, that's quite different.
    If PJ wanted his film with grain removed, then that's his call. In this case it'd be revisionist to go back in the process to a pre-DNR version and release that with its grain intact, against PJ's wishes.
    Steve W
     
  9. cafink

    cafink Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 1999
    Messages:
    3,045
    Likes Received:
    36
    Revisionism isn't the only problem with excessive DNR. DNR removes details and produces an image that some find aesthetically unpleasant. A director certainly has creative license to use DNR as one of his filmmaking tools, but that doesn't automatically make it a good idea.
     
  10. Michel_Hafner

    Michel_Hafner Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2002
    Messages:
    952
    Likes Received:
    102
    While it was done with the blessing of the director it was poorly done and looks very bad compared to the current state of the art. And Jackson did not want the grain removed in general. It was a couple of specific grainy shots. Another matter was the print of "Seabiscuit" which I saw back then which was RUINED by DNR. That was fixed later on.
     
  11. Doctorossi

    Doctorossi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2012
    Messages:
    841
    Likes Received:
    37
    Well, isn't that ironic? :D
    (D'oh! Steve beat me to it.)
     

Share This Page