Excellent article in new 'Sight & Sound' on the art & science of Blu-Ray transfers

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Dortmunder, Nov 13, 2012.

  1. Dortmunder

    Dortmunder Auditioning

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    4
    Real Name:
    joe frady
    Written by Nick Wrigley, formerly of Masters of Cinema in the UK.
    A thrillingly interesting despatch ~
    Should be learned off by heart by every Blu-Ray producer in the business.
     
  2. JoeDoakes

    JoeDoakes Cinematographer
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,499
    Likes Received:
    644
    Real Name:
    Ray
    Is this online anywhere? The print is really hard to see. thanks
     
  3. Dortmunder

    Dortmunder Auditioning

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    4
    Real Name:
    joe frady
    Haven't found it online yet, just PDF downloads, from which this screen grab was taken. Apologies for the quality, I sharpened it up as much as I could.
    I find if you right click and open in a new tab it's pretty legible, as opposed to just left clicking the image.
     
  4. Michel_Hafner

    Michel_Hafner Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2002
    Messages:
    982
    Likes Received:
    109
    It was about time such an article was written. Could have been from me 5 years ago. :cool:
    I remember I got quite worried as early as "Lord of the Rings 2" when DNR started to creep into digital cinema masters.
     
  5. BJQ1972

    BJQ1972 Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2012
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    7
    Real Name:
    Barrie Quinn
    Thanks for posting.
     
  6. bgart13

    bgart13 Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,042
    Likes Received:
    148
    Real Name:
    Ben
    Excellent article. Done in a way lay people can understand. Cheers to Nick!
     
  7. Yorkshire

    Yorkshire Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    1,376
    Likes Received:
    309
    Real Name:
    Steve
    HERESY!
    :D
    Steve W
     
  8. Yorkshire

    Yorkshire Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    1,376
    Likes Received:
    309
    Real Name:
    Steve
    Surely, that's quite different.
    If PJ wanted his film with grain removed, then that's his call. In this case it'd be revisionist to go back in the process to a pre-DNR version and release that with its grain intact, against PJ's wishes.
    Steve W
     
  9. cafink

    cafink Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 1999
    Messages:
    3,047
    Likes Received:
    36
    Real Name:
    Carl Fink
    Revisionism isn't the only problem with excessive DNR. DNR removes details and produces an image that some find aesthetically unpleasant. A director certainly has creative license to use DNR as one of his filmmaking tools, but that doesn't automatically make it a good idea.
     
  10. Michel_Hafner

    Michel_Hafner Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2002
    Messages:
    982
    Likes Received:
    109
    While it was done with the blessing of the director it was poorly done and looks very bad compared to the current state of the art. And Jackson did not want the grain removed in general. It was a couple of specific grainy shots. Another matter was the print of "Seabiscuit" which I saw back then which was RUINED by DNR. That was fixed later on.
     
  11. Doctorossi

    Doctorossi Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    May 23, 2012
    Messages:
    841
    Likes Received:
    37
    Well, isn't that ironic? :D
    (D'oh! Steve beat me to it.)
     

Share This Page