Robert F. O'Connor
Agent
- Joined
- Mar 8, 1999
- Messages
- 33
Something I posted in another thread is that a lot of people are pointing out that part of the reason for the large-scale loss of life is simply that the towers were too large to evacuate in a reasonable amount of time.
There are other dangers to large buildings including earthquakes (not historically unknown in the New York area) and fires. If people can't get out quickly in such disasters they are going to die.
If something like Ebert's idea is not adopted, something more modest is probably more appropriate.
Perhaps something like one or a pair of prominent and architecturally interesting communication towers atop more modest offices and/or apartment towers.
-Robert
There are other dangers to large buildings including earthquakes (not historically unknown in the New York area) and fires. If people can't get out quickly in such disasters they are going to die.
If something like Ebert's idea is not adopted, something more modest is probably more appropriate.
Perhaps something like one or a pair of prominent and architecturally interesting communication towers atop more modest offices and/or apartment towers.
-Robert