Mike Wadkins
Supporting Actor
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2004
- Messages
- 970
I would pay Laserdisc money for the set
I think I remember reading something with the effects guys at ILM where they said they'd never, ever do that. However, I would not at all be surprised to see a CG Yoda in Phantom Menace. Apparently to demonstrate that they could convincingly do a digital Yoda to Lucas, they went through TPM and put a digital Yoda in place of the puppet. Just to maintain the continuity between those films (and because the puppet didn't look great in TPM), that's a change I wouldn't mind.Originally Posted by Josh Steinberg
The shot of Yoda walking while talking to Obi-Wan at the end of the movie is a CG shot but it's the same as it was in the theatrical release.Originally Posted by JediFonger
on teh DVD release of ep1, when yoda walked on canes, i believe that's CG yoda. it was done when AOTC was being made w/CG Yoda.
HD would just increase the resolution, it doesn't alter the movie.Originally Posted by rkwatson
But even for the purist out there for an unaltered trilogy in Hi-def... if it is in hi-def isn't it altered
That's just the problem with movies in general, especially science fiction movies and movies with special effects in them. They tend to date quickly. If they can alter certain things, what's to stop them altering other things? Lucas could alter every background in every scene to update it, but it wouldn't be Star Wars anymore. The Terminator looks dated compared to Terminator 2 as well, but James Cameron is smart enough to leave it all alone.Originally Posted by rkwatson
What about the "scene", that was shot, which was a extended version of Luke's training with Yoda in V that they could not do to fact of Yoda being a puppet? And I use quotes around scene cause I not sure if it was a rumor or really shot.
But as far as the changes go to the OT... I'm on board with any that he wants to do, as long as it does not take away from the character development like "shooting first" did to Han. It set him up as the man. But adding or cleaning up backgrounds are necessary to blend all the films together, because "Star Wars" looks dated, even compared to Empire, it just looks dated. That is what he was trying to fix.
But even for the purist out there for an unaltered trilogy in Hi-def... if it is in hi-def isn't it altered
I think you're under the false impression that old movies don't look good on Blu-ray. Star Wars was shot on film so a Blu-ray release would most likely be inferior to how good it originally looked in the theaters in 1977. A SW Blu-ray would look better than it did on VHS or laserdisc or DVD but none of those are accurate representations of what a print of the movie looked like. In other words, a Blu-ray with a "clearer and crisper" picture is closer to the original than any other home video version of the movie.Originally Posted by rkwatson
I guess it does not "alter it", I guess my point is that there is a difference, It will not be the original. You are wanting it updated, clearer and crisper but that is not the movie...
George Lucas would be the first to agree with you. It's just you both probably have different ideas of what is and is not an improvement to the movie.Originally Posted by rkwatson
That is the type of changes I like... improvements.
That's exactly what I would like. I'm all for director's intent and all that, but the audience has it's rights too, once the film has been released. But a restored version (with matte boxes and all) of what was in the theaters then is fine by me. And I never understood the complaints of a film being in stereo when it was released that way. Cutting a film to fit it into a screen is wrong, but remixing the original soundtrack to fill all speakers should be almost mandatory? Doesn't make any sense. It's even worse when the original mono or stereo track gets left off of discs because of additional dubbings, but that's another complaint.Originally Posted by TravisR
George Lucas would be the first to agree with you. It's just you both probably have different ideas of what is and is not an improvement to the movie.
On a semi-related note, I've always felt that when someone says that they want the original versions of the movie, they should want the original version with the matte boxes, weaker effects shots and rubber monster masks in the cantina. If someone wants the SE's corrected effects just without Greedo shooting first, they don't want the originals- they want to pick and choose the new elements that they like. I'm not saying that anyone is wrong for wanting just the new effects but that isn't the original movie.