What's new

Question about Picture storage in OS X (1 Viewer)

BrianShort

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jan 18, 2000
Messages
931
So as I mentioned in the other thread, I received my MBP today. I've been playing with some images, and am confused about how OS X stores the images. I downloaded the Aperture 2.0 trial, and also was playing around with iPhoto. I imported some photos from my camera initially into iPhoto, but also in Aperture. I was going through them in iPhoto, deleting the ones I didn't like - most of them :frowning:, but noticed they still existed in Aperture. Does this mean that if I import photos into both pieces of software, I effectively have two copies of the photo on my computer, wasting HD space? What's the best way to manage my pictures if I want to use iPhoto to look at images, and Aperture to make adjustments?
 

collinong

Auditioning
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
5
Real Name
Collin Ong
iPhoto and Aperture are two separate programs so they each have their own library. The feature you are looking for (sorta) is "import images by reference." This exists in both iPhoto and Aperture. This will let you import image files into your own folder hierarchy and then iP/Ap will link to those files instead of copying them into their own library. However, they will still have their own library structure that contains thumbnails and adjustment data.

Your best bet will be to choose one or the other...Aperture is the better program obviously but it is bigger and more complex and if you don't have fast enough hardware it will really bog down.

This is the way I have mine set up:
- I have a folder "Image Archive" on one of my disks.
- I set Aperture to import images by reference and set the "Image Archive" directory as where it should store them. I set the subfolder to "Project Name."
- When downloading images from my flash cards, I first create a new Project and name it something like: "20080411 Disneyland Pictures". I also also created a new file renaming preset that renames the files like this: "20080411-IMG_5823-Disneyland.JPG". The Disneyland is entered as the custom text field below the file rename preset setting.

This way, when I download images into Aperture, it creates a sub-directory within "Image Archive" and then copies the images into that subdirectory. The sub-directory is named the same as the Aperture project that the images are imported into. Since I name the project with YEARMMDD in reverse, both the projects in Aperture and the sub-directories will alphabetize in proper chronological order. As it copies images, Aperture will rename them to contain the date, the image number (useful to reference the exact image later), and a short keyword so I can know what the heck kind of image it is.

Back to your original question, once the images are on disk, you'd have to reimport them into iPhoto if you wanted to use both. If you delete an image in either iPhoto or Aperture, it would still be in the library of the other program, unless you choose to also delete the original file, but that would only confuse the other program since it would still be trying to link to a file that doesn't exist any longer. So the bottom line is to choose one program and stick with it. Once you get the hang of Aperture, you won't want to touch iPhoto at all.
 

BrianShort

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jan 18, 2000
Messages
931
Ok, thanks for the tips. Right now I have a library in iPhoto that I had to re-import after I deleted it yesterday, thinking that I had created a separate library in Aperture (I think I selected to leave files at their current location whe I imported, then when I deleted them out of iPhoto, boom, they were gone out of aperture too :frowning:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Forum statistics

Threads
357,078
Messages
5,130,267
Members
144,284
Latest member
Gigaspin88
Recent bookmarks
1
Top