Olive announced first titles from the Republic catalog: "High Noon" and the original "Invasion of th

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by SeanAx, Apr 26, 2012.

  1. Matt Hough

    Matt Hough Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Messages:
    14,705
    Likes Received:
    3,102
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Real Name:
    Matt Hough
    Who owns the rights to the 1993 version?
     
  2. Guest

    I think Warner owns the 1993 version.
     
  3. JoHud

    JoHud Producer

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,217
    Likes Received:
    513
    Real Name:
    Joe Hudak
    The fact that they are offering a blu-ray release adds quite a bit of confidence that this is better than the 1998 Artisan disc. That was outstandingly poor and there's no way they would get away with releasing that one on blu-ray.
    Also, notice that Olive doesn't release all of its licensed films on blu-ray. The Buccaneer (1938) and Pony Express were both DVD only, yet the video quality was quite strong enough on the DVD that they could have passed off an upconversion if they wanted to.
    This should actually be a cause of relief. It specifies "Restored of a Finegrain 35mm print" -- far more reassuring than releases like The Quiet Man or Rio Grande. Those releases never promised anything more than being "digitally remastered." What it is remastered from is never specified on the Artisan discs, though most of the time it was from the same VHS transfer used years ago. "Restored" is one word I never saw being associated with an Artisan release, unless it was "Restored audio."
    I do agree with some of the concerns that some Olive Film titles have less-than stellar HD transfers compared to benchmark studio or Criterion releases, though I certainly wouldn't lump them with the majority of the Republic/Artisan DVDs. They can only be an improvement.
     
  4. John Hodson

    John Hodson Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    4,531
    Likes Received:
    316
    Location:
    Bolton, Lancashire
    Real Name:
    John
    I saw a HD broadcast version of 'Body Snatchers' a while back; it was decent but no socks were blown off. And that's what I think we'll get on BD.
     
  5. Charles Smith

    Charles Smith Extremely Talented Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    Messages:
    5,215
    Likes Received:
    1,181
    Location:
    Nor'east
    Real Name:
    Charles Smith
    I never saw any DVD copy of IOTBS, but did watch the Criterion LD some months ago, and it was just shockingly awful, with contrast blown right out of the water. I had to take the TV settings down to practically nothing to make it watchable, and even then it was just barely so.
     
  6. Doug Otte

    Doug Otte Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    748
    Likes Received:
    39
    Hi John. Are you familiar w/ the DVD? If so, how did the HD broadcast compare?
    Thanks,
    Doug
     
  7. John Hodson

    John Hodson Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    4,531
    Likes Received:
    316
    Location:
    Bolton, Lancashire
    Real Name:
    John
    No Doug; I've been waiting a long time for someone to produce a worthy edition, and that includes decent supplements.
     
  8. Jacksmyname

    Jacksmyname Second Unit

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    308
    Likes Received:
    76
    Real Name:
    Jack Walder
    Ditto.
     
  9. Gary16

    Gary16 Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    523
    Likes Received:
    203
    Real Name:
    Gary
    Would the original camera negative have been full frame? Years ago I saw a 16mm print that I'm,sure was full frame (1.33:1) and not panned/scanned like the later full frame releases of the movie on Laser and DVD (including Criterion).
     
  10. Bob Furmanek

    Bob Furmanek Insider
    Insider

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2001
    Messages:
    4,811
    Likes Received:
    5,384
    The original camera negative would have an image area of 1.37:1.
    In the early years of non-anamorphic widescreen, the films were protected for open matte while composed for widescreen in the various studio ratios. This illustration from the May 1953 issue of American Cinematographer illustrates how the compositions were achieved with the modified view-finders.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    This is precisely how Don Siegel and Ellsworth Fredericks would have photographed IOTBS.
    I had posted the JG info from memory which is always a dangerous thing!
    Republic announced their widescreen house ratio on August 18, 1953. Their ratios ranged from 1.66:1 to 1.85:1.
    JOHNNY GUITAR began filming in mid-October.
    [​IMG]
    When released in August 1954, Exhibitor listed the AR as 1.85:1 and Variety listed 1.66:1.
    Based on that information, I would suggest 1.66:1 as the correct ratio for JOHNNY GUITAR.
    Bob
     
  11. John Morgan

    John Morgan Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2001
    Messages:
    732
    Likes Received:
    85
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Real Name:
    John
    The Perspecta track was transferred to a modern configuration that allows it to be heard successfully in today’s sound formats. The entire track was done for Paramount around 2005, I so I hope it can be included in this release. I erred about a surround track. Sorry.
    I also heard a rumor that the full frame version was actually taken from a wide screen print as the camera original wasn't found and it is somewhat grainy because of this...in effect, a pan and scan version? Maybe this was discussed and I missed it.
     
  12. Bob Furmanek

    Bob Furmanek Insider
    Insider

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2001
    Messages:
    4,811
    Likes Received:
    5,384
    At the time we met with Paramount, Mr. Eberenz and I had proposed to take the original 35mm Perspecta optical tracks and decode them utilizing a restored Fairchild integrator to an exact three channel digital copy. Mr. Eberenz had worked on mixing many of the tracks for MGM in 1954/55 and knew precisely what to do.
    Yes, the current 1.37:1 version is a pan and scan from the 2.00:1 element.
    About 30 years ago, a well known film collector in New Jersey had an original 16mm print of the full frame 1.37:1 version without the opening and closing wraparounds. I believe he sold the print in the Big Reel. Who knows where it wound up?
    Bob
     
  13. John Morgan

    John Morgan Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2001
    Messages:
    732
    Likes Received:
    85
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Real Name:
    John
    I tried finding INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS on Amazon, as someone mentioned they ordered it. No problem with HIGH NOON, but after looking a bit, the 1956 Olive release is there, but Amazon mistakenly have added [1978] after the title, so you may have to scroll down to find it.
     
  14. Paul Penna

    Paul Penna Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    Messages:
    592
    Likes Received:
    90
    It can be found by entering this ASIN in the Amazon search box: B007Y1NPSM
    Note that what comes up first is the Amazon Search Results layout, which defaults to having the item release date after the title, in this case (2012). To get the correct incorrect "1978" you have to click through to the single item page.
     
  15. Bob Furmanek

    Bob Furmanek Insider
    Insider

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2001
    Messages:
    4,811
    Likes Received:
    5,384
    Sean: This is slightly off topic but I would like to make a suggestion to the good people at Olive. I just watched a terrific Allied Artists film (now owned by Paramount) called RIOT IN CELL BLOCK 11. It's directed by Don Siegel and composed for 1.85:1. So far as I know, it's never been on DVD and would be an excellent release.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  16. John Hodson

    John Hodson Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    4,531
    Likes Received:
    316
    Location:
    Bolton, Lancashire
    Real Name:
    John
    I second that emotion.
     
  17. dana martin

    dana martin Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2003
    Messages:
    2,776
    Likes Received:
    719
    Location:
    Norfolk, VA
    Real Name:
    Dana Martin
    The little Sci-Fi paranoia film that could, ok if any of you could tell me, how is Olive Films releases in HD? I don’t have a single one as of yet, but if they now are going to be going thru the Republic Catalog that could change real quick. Back to the opening statement, IOTBS could be presented so many ways and I don’t know if it would make everyone happy, the only way for that to happen would for it to be a two disc set SuperScope and Director version on separate disc, also add the option of original ending and no narration (The Pure Cut) that has been mentioned, love this film, and if this can get WB to look at Hawks “Thing” for a high def release, it make it all the better.


    High Noon, just waiting to fawn over Grace Kelly and watch as Cooper kicks ass
     
  18. RolandL

    RolandL Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    3,443
    Likes Received:
    823
    Location:
    Cromwell, CT
    Real Name:
    Roland Lataille
    IOTBS will be sourced from a fine grain print. The only aspect ratio should be 2:1.
     
  19. dana martin

    dana martin Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2003
    Messages:
    2,776
    Likes Received:
    719
    Location:
    Norfolk, VA
    Real Name:
    Dana Martin
    yep i know, and i am ok with that, because it was OAR, but also the other Aspect Ratio would have been a nice extra
     
  20. RolandL

    RolandL Producer

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    3,443
    Likes Received:
    823
    Location:
    Cromwell, CT
    Real Name:
    Roland Lataille
    You can only get the full 1.37:1 aspect ratio from the negative which doesn't exist.
     

Share This Page