DVD Review HTF REVIEW: House of Games

Discussion in 'DVD' started by Matt Hough, Aug 11, 2007.

Tags:
  1. Matt Hough

    Matt Hough Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Messages:
    14,557
    Likes Received:
    2,957
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Real Name:
    Matt Hough
    XenForo Template



    House of Games
    Directed by David Mamet

    Studio: Criterion
    Year: 1987
    Aspect Ratio: 1.78:1 anamorphic
    Running Time: 102 minutes
    Rating: R
    Audio: Dolby Digital 1.0 English
    Subtitles: SDH
    MSRP: $39.95

    Release Date: August 21, 2007
    Review Date: August 11, 2007


    The Film

    4/5

    Movies about con men playing con games on unsuspecting victims reached their zenith with the 1973 masterwork The Sting. Since then, films with con games as a central conceit have been almost too numerous to mention, but after years of seeing them, most audiences rightly feel that they can stay ahead of the game and beat the filmmakers to the punch. That’s where David Mamet’s House of Games has the audience fooled. Yes, it’s filled to the brim with long and short cons, but the biggest con of all is that it’s not primarily about that at all. The con games keep us hooked while we watch a woman come to some painful, frightening, and inevitably liberating realizations about herself. With David Mamet as the writer as well as the director, it shouldn’t come as any surprise that the film would put as much emphasis on character development as it does on trying to fool us.

    Dr. Margaret Ford (Lindsay Crouse) is a psychiatrist undergoing something of a career crisis. She’s convinced she’s not doing her patients any good and despite being a best selling author and respected by others in her profession, she seems somewhat lost and disillusioned with life. Into her life comes con man Mike Mancuso (Joe Mantegna) who attempts to pull a con on her which she sees through right before losing her money. Somewhat smitten with the man and his appetite for living life on the edge, Margaret gets the idea that being in on a con and learning some of the “tricks of their trade” might wake her up to some exciting things life has to offer (and also form the basis of a new potential best seller).

    David Mamet’s coruscating plays like Glengarry Glen Ross and Speed the Plow have brought him numerous awards and much acclaim, and his screenplay for this film is likewise a fulcrum of crackling dialog and riveting plotting all revolving around two of his most interesting characters. Margaret and Mike seem as far apart as the opposite ends of the Mississippi River, and yet in their navigating the tricky waters of their cons, it makes a strange kind of sense that they’re wildly attracted to each other.

    Lindsay Crouse plays the entire film with a sphinx-like mask on her emotions, and while her line readings are in a monotone that’s distinguished only by the increase and decrease of volume, we can see emotions in her eyes and body language, her “tells” in con-man parlance. Joe Montegna brings a long history of performing David Mamet characters with him into this film, and he’s perfectly cast, a charming, knowledgeable snake in the grass. Lilia Skala makes the most of her few scenes as Margaret’s mentor (and conscience), and Mike Nussbaum, Ricky Jay, and Steven Goldstein play their parts in the elaborate charade on display. Look fast and you’ll see young actors J.T. Walsh and William H. Macy in small roles early in their careers.

    For a first time director, Mamet seems especially assured in giving pace and adding interest to an extended poker game and in a climactic encounter between two characters late in the film which begins the real surprises which the film has to offer even the most astute viewer. They were my favorite moments in the film. Cinematographer Juan Ruiz Anchia gives us some fascinating glimpses of Seattle, but interior shots of bars and of a pool hall in particular have a kind of sleazy grace that’s quite captivating.

    Video Quality

    4.5/5

    The aspect ratio of 1.78:1 is presented in an excellent anamorphic transfer on this DVD. Color is well delivered without being too rich with flesh tones especially lifelike. Shadow detail is quite nice in some of the darker indoor shots though the film has not been overly lit. The film does show moderate grain though there are no artifacts to mar the presentation, and I glimpsed no edge enhancement to spoil the mood of the outstanding photography. The film has been divided into 22 chapters.

    Audio Quality

    4/5

    The DVD sports a Dolby Digital 1.0 mono mix, but there is a surprising amount of low end to the sound design, especially true in Alaric Jans’ piano score and with some of the gunfire that punctuates the story. It’s a solid if not exceptional mono presentation.

    Special Features

    4/5

    Writer-director David Mamet and actor-con game expert Ricky Jay share the audio commentary duties on the disc, and it’s a lively discussion filled with reminiscences about the making of the film and also with Mamet occasionally going off track to ask pointed questions to Jay on the nature of scamming people. Occasionally the two men get involved in watching the movie and forget to talk, but such lapses don’t happen often.

    The disc offers separate interviews with each of the two stars looking back on their memories of making the film. Lindsay Crouse was married to David Mamet at the time of the filming, and she seems especially grateful looking back that she was handed this marvelously rich role in a film to be directed by her husband. Her interview is presented in anamorphic widescreen and runs 14½ minutes.

    Joe Montegna’s 14-minute interview is also in anamorphic widescreen, and he speaks of his long association with David Mamet and his works and finds special joy remembering working with both David and Lindsay on the project when they were all such good friends off screen.

    At one point in the film, the con man played by Mike Nussbaum shows Lindsay Crouse’s character a short con and how he pulled it off. Originally, a different, more elaborate con was going to be demonstrated to her, and the feature called “The Tap” shows the complete storyboards which one can flip through for this aborted sequence.

    Producer Michael Hausman and his wife shot video footage of Mamet discussing this work on his film, and we’re taken behind the scenes to see moments of the original table read, several rehearsals between the two leads, some actual filming in progress, and especially the elaborate pains to make the poker game a pivotal moment in the film. This feature entitled “David Mamet on House of Games” is presented in 4:3 and runs 24½ minutes.

    The film’s original 2-minute theatrical trailer is presented in anamorphic widescreen.

    The enclosed 29-page booklet offers an appreciation of the film (which doesn’t include any spoilers much to his credit) by film writer Kent Jones and a lengthy, self-effacing reminiscence of his first directorial effort by David Mamet, excerpted from the preface of the published screenplay for the film.

    In Conclusion

    4/5 (not an average)


    House of Games is a film which deserves more of a reputation than it’s thus far received. The plot is tight, the characters interesting, and the direction taut. If you’re a fan of low-key psychological thrillers, you can’t go wrong with this one.


    Matt Hough
    Charlotte, NC
     
  2. MatS

    MatS Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    1,599
    Likes Received:
    0
    wow didn't know this was getting the Criterion treatment
    a movie I loved to watch whenever it was on cable back in the day

    wouldn't spend that kind of coin on it but glad to see it is out there for those who would
     
  3. ErichH

    ErichH Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    1,167
    Likes Received:
    0
    Own the basic DVD of this. Didn't think it would ever rate a Criterion rip. Interesting.
     
  4. Ron Reda

    Ron Reda Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2001
    Messages:
    2,281
    Likes Received:
    2
    When I saw that this version was coming out, I rented the barebones release from Netflix. After watching it last night for the first time since working in a video store 15+ years ago, I'm pained to say it was very "meh" to me. Granted, I knew the ending, but it just didn't hold my attention the way it did all those years ago. I wonder if seeing so many films in recent memory that are descendants of this one has sort of ruined it for me.
     
  5. Douglas R

    Douglas R Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2000
    Messages:
    2,044
    Likes Received:
    386
    Location:
    London, United Kingdom
    Real Name:
    Doug
    This is WAY too expensive, as are many other Criterion releases. Especially as other companies put out DVDs with more extensive extras than Criterion and at a much cheaper price.
     
  6. John Gilmore

    John Gilmore Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 1999
    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA.
    MattH, thanks for the review.

    Ok, I guess I'll be the minority view here.....I have no problem with the price of this disc.

    "House of Games" is one of my top-10 films of all time. It's one of those movies that I rented one night many years from my local mom-and-pop video store (remember those?), when all the new releases were checked out and I just wanted to watch something. Man, was I blown away. The film was on Roger Ebert's top-10 Best of the 1980's list and I could see why: it was edgy and atmospheric and had a great cast, esp. Lindsay Crouse and Joe Montegna. And the film actually gave you something to think about. Although Mamet's style of dialogue is well-known now, it was very fresh at the time. In fact, I don't think the film feels dated at all, but I do think that in light of David Mamet's other works, it has been largely forgotten. I am thrilled that Criterion chose this film. I've already sold off the standard DVD and will be picking up the Criterion on release date.
     
  7. Ken_McAlinden

    Ken_McAlinden Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2001
    Messages:
    6,171
    Likes Received:
    66
    Location:
    Livonia, MI USA
    Real Name:
    Kenneth McAlinden
    This is a great movie that holds up to repeated viewings much better than most "big con" films. On one level it is a pretty good example of such a story, but it also works as a character piece dissecting the compulsive natures of its characters, none moreso than Crouse's. There are some neat cinematic touches, too, like the way Mamet sometimes shoots his characters conversing in profile so it looks almost like one of those optical illusion illustrations where you either see a vase in the middle or two profiles on the sides.

    Regards,
     
  8. Vegas 1

    Vegas 1 Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 1999
    Messages:
    526
    Likes Received:
    34
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    Real Name:
    Alvin Kuenster
    Thanks for the review, rented this from Netflix a while back, did not realize it was not enhanced but enjoyed it. I may bite on this Criterion disc.
     
  9. Ron Reda

    Ron Reda Cinematographer

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2001
    Messages:
    2,281
    Likes Received:
    2

    You really think so? Hmm, after seeing it many years ago and revisiting it recently on DVD this time, I can't imagine watching it again. To each his own, though... [​IMG]
     
  10. BrentJ

    BrentJ Second Unit

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2002
    Messages:
    329
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is this a one or two disc set? Also, would you guys recommend this as a blind buy? I like the sound of the movie just not sure I want to dish out the cash. Thanks
     
  11. Matt Hough

    Matt Hough Executive Producer
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Messages:
    14,557
    Likes Received:
    2,957
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Real Name:
    Matt Hough
    The Criterion edition reviewed above is a one disc set. As for a blind buy, the film is really outstanding, and the special features are interesting, but for myself, I'd have to decide how often I might revisit the film once I knew all of its secrets. For me, it's rich enough to yield more with a second, third, or fourth viewing, but others may not feel the same way. A rental might be the safest way to go if you're undecided.
     
  12. oscar_merkx

    oscar_merkx Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Messages:
    7,632
    Likes Received:
    1
    Thanks for the review.

    I loved GGR and had never heard of this before.

    I'll guess it will be another blind buy
     
  13. WaveCrest

    WaveCrest Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,224
    Likes Received:
    12
    Real Name:
    Richard
    Interested in getting House of Games (1987). Good review btw.
     

Share This Page