elMalloc
Supporting Actor
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2001
- Messages
- 787
- Real Name
- Reuben
Hello all,
What would you upgrade -for now-, if you were in my position.
I use a 17" trinitron monitor. I'm on the PC a lot, and I play most types of games on it (FPS like counterstrike included). Though my PC time is windows (2d) 70%, games (3d) 30%. I've heard the contrast just isn't very high so some games become unplayable because they are dark, and because they are blurry because the response time of the monitor is too low.
I use a 27" nonHDTV but it has component inputs. I'm pretty fine with the picture for all games (xbox, ps2, gc) and DVs, though I know I would probably like progressive scan and a larger set.
I use a harman kardon receiver with philips speakers/subwoofer (5.1). I like what it sounds like for movies, but music it's pretty bad. They are bookshelf speakers all around, and don't sound very good for music.
I'm choosing between a 43" 4:3 HDTV, or Energy take 5.2 speakers/subwoofer and a 17" LCD monitor.
I'm thinking that the 17" LCD monitor..I'm actually happy with my 17" trinitro, I don't know why I even want a 17" LCD other than having it as a novelty - unless people can suggest reasons why I should have one.
The energy take 5 set has good reviews all around, especially for small rooms like mine (12x12).
An HDTV for the obvious reasons of progressive scan video games/DVDs, and 16:9 squeezed DVDs. A larger 4:3 TV would help for games, too.
Thanks for any opinions - it is ultimately my decision but what would you guys choose? I'm usually a spontaneous buyer, but also sometimes one who critically thinks decisions to the last bit - I either think about it a lot or I buy it without thinking - no middle.
-ELmO
What would you upgrade -for now-, if you were in my position.
I use a 17" trinitron monitor. I'm on the PC a lot, and I play most types of games on it (FPS like counterstrike included). Though my PC time is windows (2d) 70%, games (3d) 30%. I've heard the contrast just isn't very high so some games become unplayable because they are dark, and because they are blurry because the response time of the monitor is too low.
I use a 27" nonHDTV but it has component inputs. I'm pretty fine with the picture for all games (xbox, ps2, gc) and DVs, though I know I would probably like progressive scan and a larger set.
I use a harman kardon receiver with philips speakers/subwoofer (5.1). I like what it sounds like for movies, but music it's pretty bad. They are bookshelf speakers all around, and don't sound very good for music.
I'm choosing between a 43" 4:3 HDTV, or Energy take 5.2 speakers/subwoofer and a 17" LCD monitor.
I'm thinking that the 17" LCD monitor..I'm actually happy with my 17" trinitro, I don't know why I even want a 17" LCD other than having it as a novelty - unless people can suggest reasons why I should have one.
The energy take 5 set has good reviews all around, especially for small rooms like mine (12x12).
An HDTV for the obvious reasons of progressive scan video games/DVDs, and 16:9 squeezed DVDs. A larger 4:3 TV would help for games, too.
Thanks for any opinions - it is ultimately my decision but what would you guys choose? I'm usually a spontaneous buyer, but also sometimes one who critically thinks decisions to the last bit - I either think about it a lot or I buy it without thinking - no middle.
-ELmO