Kaskade1309
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2020
- Messages
- 4,320
- Real Name
- S
Why though? Why should stuff like this happen with FLAGSHIP products? Isn't that WHY we pay extra for these kinds of units? At least partly why we do (outside of getting audiophile touches some look for such as SACD/DVD-A support, XLR outputs, etc.)?Honestly, I'm not that surprised at all anymore at a Panasonic player failing prematurely, even one that costs $1K and would otherwise seemed built like a tank (as far as such goes). Stuff like that does happen
Are you saying that it doesn't surprise you that a PANASONIC product in particular would fail, regardless of price?
Thank you for acknowledging this (which I couldn't get anyone to up until now); from what my research into this indicated, many owners were experiencing a "scratchy" sound when the drawer moved in and out, and I too experienced this from the beginning (the tray was never silky smooth in movement, save for when it opened most of the time, which surprised me the most out of a unit of this caliber).... although the tray noise thing starting/happening several months into ownership does seem unusual, especially for a $1K player.
I simply don't understand why the marketing mechanicals for the UB9000 suggest the disc drive is "cradled" in some kind of contraption that virtually guarantees no vibrations or noise from the area, yet I have experienced nothing but noise when discs go into the machine and/or load.
I understand what you're saying, but I was merely responding to the individual who replied before you who accused me of something that wasn't true; initially, I started this thread out of sheer frustration over having to send back two copies of The Texas Chain Saw Massacre because they wouldn't play in my unit (and Poltergeist before that, during last Halloween season), which got me wondering whether this is a player or disc issue. The other issues continue to plague my unit (noisy 4K disc loading sessions, the cogging/vibration noise when the drawer closes, et al), but to address your statement above directly, I was responding to something that was said to me in a previous post.Anyhoo, you probably just need to let that go by this point, if nothing else... and just move on... so you can get back to enjoying this "hobby" and not become/stay needlessly obsessed about this apparently overly long-running, negative experience and disappointment...
I'm not going to go to an all-plastic deck because of these issues; I refuse to believe that the $199 players would behave in a more premium fashion than the aluminum-coated ones, but I do understand the penchant for wanting to suggest this to me.IF I were you, I'd just get a fairly inexpensive, easily replaceable, but otherwise excellent-at-actual-playback, player just for the HT/video side and use your old Cambridge Audio for whatever higher quality audio playback (and/or maybe other region BDs if it's actually capable just like the Oppos?)... or just use that for everything, if there are no issues w/ that at all...
As for the Cambridge, it too actually has an issue that I had trouble dealing with, which is how I ended up with the Panasonic -- after a few months of ownership, the Cambridge began to exhibit a noise near the disc drive area only when playing DVD media, nothing else (I describe it as a "ticking" sound that was quite audible from 12 feet away). The player was still under warranty, so it was sent back three times to the repair center, which couldn't duplicate the problem nor fix it, even after installing a new loader.
It's getting to the point, though, that I'd rather just deal with the noise from the CXUHD (Cambridge) than what the Panny is putting me through.
Look at everything I've gone through with these players, the UB9000 in particular -- if anyone has a justification for crying over spilled milk, it's me, wouldn't you reckon? Further, I'm in a dilemma because I don't know if I want to get this unit serviced or if I want to get rid of it and start over with another UB9000 (so I'd have features like the HDR Optimizer and the external build element) to see what would happen -- or, if I just want to put this thing back in its box and use the Cambridge for all service.As they do say, "no use crying over spilled milk" over and over again afterall...
_Man_