Brian Perry
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- May 6, 1999
- Messages
- 2,807
Yes, I'm partial to the Cubs, but I think it can be objectively argued that Sosa had a better year than Bonds.
In Bond's favor:
Home run record
Slugging percentage record
Walks record
Higher on-base percentage than Sosa
In Sosa's favor:
More total bases than Bonds
More RBI than Bonds
More runs than Bonds
Remember, the homerun record is no guarantee of MVP -- McGwire lost to Sosa in '98 mainly due to the Cubs making the playoffs. Neither the Giants nor the Cubs made the playoffs this year, so that's a push. In relation to his team, Sosa was definitely more valuable. (He had 94 more RBI than the next highest teammate.) And finally, while I know it shouldn't matter, Sosa has a better relationship with the media, who will determine the winner.
Let the debate begin!
------------------
Home Theater Pictures
[Edited last by Brian Perry on October 08, 2001 at 10:47 AM]
In Bond's favor:
Home run record
Slugging percentage record
Walks record
Higher on-base percentage than Sosa
In Sosa's favor:
More total bases than Bonds
More RBI than Bonds
More runs than Bonds
Remember, the homerun record is no guarantee of MVP -- McGwire lost to Sosa in '98 mainly due to the Cubs making the playoffs. Neither the Giants nor the Cubs made the playoffs this year, so that's a push. In relation to his team, Sosa was definitely more valuable. (He had 94 more RBI than the next highest teammate.) And finally, while I know it shouldn't matter, Sosa has a better relationship with the media, who will determine the winner.
Let the debate begin!
------------------
Home Theater Pictures
[Edited last by Brian Perry on October 08, 2001 at 10:47 AM]