Rick Radford
Supporting Actor
- Joined
- May 12, 2001
- Messages
- 642
http://www.axiomaudio.com/
Due to events at work, I ended up cutting my speaker purchase budget by half. (which may have been a good thing as it drove me to try to find the best sound/price (value) in speakers with tower mains.)
I had been strongly looking at Paradigm Studio 60/20/cc. I searched for PSB, but could not find any local dealers. I listened to Monitor Audio Gold and Silvers. I also listened to Klipsch RF3, Deftech 2006 and BP8, KEF, Phase Technology, etc.
It would be interesting to compare the Axioms to something like the HTD Level 3 towers/mains/center, although the Axioms are a little higher pricewise. Another internet speaker I'd like to hear are the Swan Divas, but the combo I was interested in (5.1/2.1/c3) cost more than my entire 5.1 setup (including SVS).
I was able to bring in some Paradigm Studio 40 and NHT 2.5 on separate occasions for a trial before I found Axiom. I liked the sound of both. However, I prefer tower mains.. and my wife didn't like the modern design of the NHT.
Recalling the sound of those trial speakers is tough as I try to compare the Axioms with those earlier listening experiences. I'd really like to get those Studio 40s back in for an A/B test with the Axioms. Then I'd really be comfy with an accurate comparison to speakers that are well regarded.
I think the M60s sound really good in full range. The bass is strong. Strong enough that at higher volume levels (-10 to -15dB or so), the sub is not needed. (I calibrated with Avia at 75 dB / master volume control set at -10 dB.. thus reference would be at MV = 0).
I typically run the system with the 5.0 speakers set to small for HT. For music, I use direct mode quite a bit (mains only.. no sub). I also enjoy (more than I thought I would) the all stereo mode.
With the trial speakers, I had no cc or surrounds.. so I have no experience with which to compare the VP100 or M3Ti as surrounds. I used the M3s for mains for a week or so while I waited on the M60s to arrive. Again, I was pleasantly surprised at the depth and fullness of these little bookshelf speakers. With the sub, I thought they did a great job as mains.
I have the VP100 on top of the TV (48" to the top of the TV) and the M3s are on 26" stands.
Overall, I find this combo to do a great job. HT is enveloping. Music sounds great. I wish I knew appropriate terminology to give a better report.
I know I don't have the experience or expertise to offer a professional review, but I hope my experience is helpful for anyone considering internet speaker options.
I welcome any input as to how to better evaluate any part of my HT.
------------------
--RR
Due to events at work, I ended up cutting my speaker purchase budget by half. (which may have been a good thing as it drove me to try to find the best sound/price (value) in speakers with tower mains.)
I had been strongly looking at Paradigm Studio 60/20/cc. I searched for PSB, but could not find any local dealers. I listened to Monitor Audio Gold and Silvers. I also listened to Klipsch RF3, Deftech 2006 and BP8, KEF, Phase Technology, etc.
It would be interesting to compare the Axioms to something like the HTD Level 3 towers/mains/center, although the Axioms are a little higher pricewise. Another internet speaker I'd like to hear are the Swan Divas, but the combo I was interested in (5.1/2.1/c3) cost more than my entire 5.1 setup (including SVS).
I was able to bring in some Paradigm Studio 40 and NHT 2.5 on separate occasions for a trial before I found Axiom. I liked the sound of both. However, I prefer tower mains.. and my wife didn't like the modern design of the NHT.
Recalling the sound of those trial speakers is tough as I try to compare the Axioms with those earlier listening experiences. I'd really like to get those Studio 40s back in for an A/B test with the Axioms. Then I'd really be comfy with an accurate comparison to speakers that are well regarded.
I think the M60s sound really good in full range. The bass is strong. Strong enough that at higher volume levels (-10 to -15dB or so), the sub is not needed. (I calibrated with Avia at 75 dB / master volume control set at -10 dB.. thus reference would be at MV = 0).
I typically run the system with the 5.0 speakers set to small for HT. For music, I use direct mode quite a bit (mains only.. no sub). I also enjoy (more than I thought I would) the all stereo mode.
With the trial speakers, I had no cc or surrounds.. so I have no experience with which to compare the VP100 or M3Ti as surrounds. I used the M3s for mains for a week or so while I waited on the M60s to arrive. Again, I was pleasantly surprised at the depth and fullness of these little bookshelf speakers. With the sub, I thought they did a great job as mains.
I have the VP100 on top of the TV (48" to the top of the TV) and the M3s are on 26" stands.
Overall, I find this combo to do a great job. HT is enveloping. Music sounds great. I wish I knew appropriate terminology to give a better report.
I know I don't have the experience or expertise to offer a professional review, but I hope my experience is helpful for anyone considering internet speaker options.
I welcome any input as to how to better evaluate any part of my HT.
------------------
--RR