What's new

Blu-ray Review A Few Words About A few words about...™ - Cimarron (1931) -- in Blu-ray (2 Viewers)

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,428
Real Name
Robert Harris
Cimarron, based upon the novel by Edna Ferber and directed by Wesley Ruggles is one of the truly great early westerns.

Of the five major studios, RKO (earlier FBO), was the only one to not have had a foothold in the silent era. They began fully formed in 1929 with sound and Technicolor, making huge investment in their early productions.

Cimarron stars matinee idol Richard Dix, along with an early RKO stalwart, who would go on to star in a few other films, named Irene Dunne.

The film was a huge risk-taking endeavor, costing over 1.4 million dollars, and giving the world one of the biggest scenes yet to hit theaters - the race recreating the 1889 Oklahoma Land Rush - a sequence that needs to be seen to be believed.

With this release, Warner Archive makes a huge step toward making every Academy Award winning film accessible on Blu-ray.

For the record, Cimarron was nominated for Best Cinematography, Best Actor, Best Actress and Best Director -- and Won for Best Writing, Adaptation, Best Art Direction...

And Best Picture 1931.

This is a brilliant restoration that goes well beyond even the level of Out of the Blue, and somehow hides all of the negative attributes of almost a hundred years of use.

Resolution shines - black levels, grain structure and stability are superb.

Cimarron is a magnificent production in all regards, that like The Broadway Melody derives a place in every serious library.


The opinion of Variety - January 27, 1931

"An elegant example of super film making and a big money picture. This is a spectacular western away from all others. It holds action, sentiment, sympathy, thrills and comedy - and 100% clean. Radio Pictures has a corker in "Cimarron."

It was given some dandy advertising for the Globe’s premier. It’s a picture that can stand any kind of strong exploitation, some of that prize Radio campaigning, where they know they have a picture.

When it may be said that the only possible fault finding about this expensive talker may be its length, 124 minutes, and that it will be difficult to cut it down for the regular picture houses without losing some of its value somewhere, that about sums up everything. Of course, 124 minutes will interfere with the usual turn-over of a picture house program, but as shown at the Globe, not a foot is padding.

Two outstanders in the playing, Richard Dix and Edna May Oliver. Each surprisingly excellent. Dix with his straight character playing of a westerner and an Oklahoma pioneer who dies before his statue is unveiled in that state, while Miss Oliver is nothing less than exquisite in her eccentric comedy role of a Colonial dame in the wilds.

A notably balanced company and an evenly balanced performance. But of the remainder perhaps nothing will draw more attention than the skillful aging of the main role players, from 1888 to 1929, a period they pass through of over 40 years on the screen.

Wesley Ruggles apparently gets the full credit for this splendid and heavy production. His direction misses nothing in the elaborate scenes, as well as in the usual film making procedure.

Big production bits start with the land rush into Oklahoma in 1888, then the gospel meeting in a frontier gambling hall where Dix makes his biggest mark, an attempted bank robbery and the court room trial of Dixie Lee, the harlot. Each of these, and others, carries its own individuality. There is something different about them all.

The land rush starts the action, men on horses and in wagons racing to capture some part of the two mil-lion acres released by the Government to the first comers after the boom of a cannon at noon. Action is further pushed into that bit when the same Dixie Lee outwits Dix by securing his horse and being the first to stake out the Bear Creek claim he was after. But in the trial where Dixie looks set for a jail term as a wanton, it is Dix who becomes her champion pleader to the jury, despite the protest of his wife, and secures as an acquittal.

It is Dix, too, who balks the bank bandits, alone, with his two-handed gun play. Dix is using the guns frequently. His first shot in the picture lopped off a piece of an ear of the heavy, and in the gospel meeting Dix ended the meeting by killing the same villain, who tried to shoot first.

Dix’s reform work as a quick shooter and editor of the local weekly turned the wild overnight camp of Osage, Okla., into a respectable town, with his influence felt throughout the newly squatted territory. Which is why he got the monument years after.

Of the other women, Estelle Taylor as Dixie Lee somewhat fades Irene Dunne as Dix’s young and old wife. Miss Taylor’s showings are few but she makes them impressive. Miss Dunne does nicely enough in a role of a loving wife and mother, which does not permit her to be much else. What she later accomplishes in a political way is suggested rather than acted. Roscoe Ates as a stuttering printer lands several laughs.

It’s doubtful if a red-blooded western such as this, another period in American history, has held as many big diverting scenes as “Cimarron.” Many parts of it grip, ofttimes quite tight, and for this reason as well as in general the women will go for it along with the men, and the kids, too."


From the New York Times

"A graphic and engrossing screen conception of Edna Ferber's widely read novel, "Cimarron," was presented by Radio Pictures last night at the Globe before a keenly interested audience. In it Richard Dix plays that unique character, Yancey Cravat, poet, pistoleer, lawyer and editor, the man who is periodically attacked with the wanderlust. This picture, a stupendous undertaking in view of the time that is covered and the hosts of persons in its scenes, starts with the land rush forty years ago to the Indian territory now known as the State of Oklahoma. It ends in 1930 with many of the characters who were in the first scenes still surviving.Although it is episodical, it holds one's attention and Mr. Dix gives a fine impersonation of Cravat. Cravat's nonchalance and his impulsiveness may seem more than a trifle strange at times, but he is nevertheless a person to be remembered. He is consistently inconsistent. His sangfroid is remarkable, but he goes on until he comes to a tragic end.From the first to the last scene one is often stirred by this chronicle. It has its subtleties and it has been most intelligently directed by Wesley Ruggles. It gives a wonderfully impressive idea of the early days in the territory, from the time the hordes of persons on horseback, in wagons and on foot make the dash to lay out their claims on the signal of a pistol shot, to the gradual improvements that come to Osage as years go by. "

I concur.

Image – 4.5

Audio – 4

Pass / Fail – Pass

Plays nicely with projectors - Yes

Worth your attention - 10

Upgrade from DVD - Yes!

Slipcover rating - n/a

Very Highly Recommended

RAH


Thank you for supporting HTF when you preorder using the link below. As an Amazon Associate, HTF earns from qualifying purchases. If you are using an adblocker you will not see link.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

bujaki

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2012
Messages
7,140
Location
Richardson, TX
Real Name
Jose Ortiz-Marrero
The land rush is spectacular and unequalled by the same in the 1960 remake. Also keep in mind that the remake ends on a severely truncated timeline, and that the two leads are miscast.
I much prefer this 1930 version which has been unjustly maligned throughout the decades as one of the worst Best Picture winners.
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,428
Real Name
Robert Harris
The land rush is spectacular and unequalled by the same in the 1960 remake. Also keep in mind that the remake ends on a severely truncated timeline, and that the two leads are miscast.
I much prefer this 1930 version which has been unjustly maligned throughout the decades as one of the worst Best Picture winners.
I agree.

It’s possible that the maligners don’t understand the state of the art of filmmaking in the early ‘30s.

These films need to be viewed with a bit of education and perspective.

I love it when I hear someone say that they don’t like black and white films.
 

jim_falconer

Screenwriter
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
1,145
Whenever I hear the actor’s name Richard Dix, my mind always goes back to that great line from Blazing Saddles…

“Our fathers came across the prairies, fought Indians, fought drought, fought locusts, fought Dix... remember when Richard Dix came in here and tried to take over this town? Well, we didn't give up then, and by gum, we're not going to give up now!”

All kidding aside, I will definitely be picking this up. It’ll be a blind buy, but I’m sure I’ll enjoy it.
 

seangood79

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Mar 5, 2009
Messages
203
Real Name
Sean
The land rush is spectacular and unequalled by the same in the 1960 remake. Also keep in mind that the remake ends on a severely truncated timeline, and that the two leads are miscast.
I much prefer this 1930 version which has been unjustly maligned throughout the decades as one of the worst Best Picture winners.
I've seen a lot of criticism on the film's treatment of race. While there certainly are some problematic scenes that invite groans, I was always impressed with how forward thinking it was towards women and Native American issues.
 
Last edited:

Colin Jacobson

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2000
Messages
13,328
I seen a lot of criticism on the film's treatment of race. While there certainly are some problematic scenes that invite groans, I was always impressed with how forward thinking it was towards women and Native American issues.

And it presents the main Jewish character in a positive manner.

Young Black kid Isaiah becomes the most problematic of the prominent characters, but at least the movie allows him an arc and development, so he's not just there as a stereotype the whole time.

The movie would never be made the same way now, but it's clear that 90+ years ago, it offered progressive views.
 

Mark Mayes

Second Unit
Joined
Mar 14, 2004
Messages
278
Location
West Hollywood
Real Name
Mark Mayes
I never was into this film, despite being an Oklahoman who heard his great-grandmother (paternal side) talk about being in The Rush. But I bought it on the strength of this review thinking I might feel differently after this third viewing....

Well, I do. What a fine film!
I believe all the characters are treated with sympathy-- Isaiah in the parlor was very moving, the wistfulness of Sol in his last scene with Sabra, and the intermarriage of the new generation that became a part of the legacy for us there ( I am a card-holding Chickasaw myself and heard many tales from my great grandmother on the maternal side about what that time was like.)

It's likely the presentation that made me a fan this time. It does sparkle, and apart from some trouble discerning dialogue at the very beginning, it was a clear soundtrack and a fresh-looking, new experience of something I was never sold on before.
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,428
Real Name
Robert Harris
I never was into this film, despite being an Oklahoman who heard his great-grandmother (paternal side) talk about being in The Rush. But I bought it on the strength of this review thinking I might feel differently after this third viewing....

Well, I do. What a fine film!
I believe all the characters are treated with sympathy-- Isaiah in the parlor was very moving, the wistfulness of Sol in his last scene with Sabra, and the intermarriage of the new generation that became a part of the legacy for us there ( I am a card-holding Chickasaw myself and heard many tales from my great grandmother on the maternal side about what that time was like.)

It's likely the presentation that made me a fan this time. It does sparkle, and apart from some trouble discerning dialogue at the very beginning, it was a clear soundtrack and a fresh-looking, new experience of something I was never sold on before.
I’m told that an immense amount of funding toward restorative efforts went into bringing this film back from the RKO scrap pile. Seeing it in this condition is a new experience for me.

And thank you for your very special comments from a unique-ish perspective..
 

Bert Greene

Screenwriter
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
1,060
Absolutely astonishing, the improvement in picture quality! All the cobwebs are dusted away, and it gives the film a vibrant visual pulse that I never quite fully discerned up to this point.

I'm still a bit mixed on the film itself. It has some absolutely marvelous scenes and set-pieces, full of color and atmosphere, and the first hour or so is particularly stellar. But I've never really cottoned to these types of episodic, time-spanning tales, and the choppiness to the narratives that invariably ensues. Nor is it entirely easy for me to square the circle over a protagonist whose wanderlust leads to the habit of occasionally deserting his wife and children, no matter how much Ferber tries to absolve him with imbued romanticism. But where I find the film extremely interesting and effective is how it serves up the historical self-reflection and perspective from then-contemporary worldviews, in terms of civilizational and societal development. Here, it carries a lot of weight, and duly impresses. After all, this tale begins in 1889, only 42 years separated from the film's production. Anyway, it's quite an epic, and well-deserving of this mind-blowing restoration.
 

Hedley Lamarr

Auditioning
Joined
Aug 9, 2023
Messages
5
Real Name
Sterling C Jones
Hi folks. First time posting here. I haven't seen the Blu-Ray yet of Cimarron. Having just watched the DVD recently, it may be a while before I pick it up, but thanks to these positive reviews, I'm looking forward to it.

A note to add to the critical discussion of this film: In my opinion, the reason why this film has fallen out of favor today is because our collective sense of humor has changed. At the time it was released, it was sophisticated satire of the sort that plays differently to different portions of the audience depending on their level of awareness of the world around them. There are queues to this being the case, such as the "Terrific as all creation!" tagline and the over-the-top painting in of Dix in the poster. Ferber said of the novel Cimarron that it was intended as a satirical criticism of American womanhood and American sentimentality. Understanding this is important for getting a proper read on the interactions between Yancey and Sabra, as well as the treatment of ethnic minority characters.
 

Robin9

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
7,692
Real Name
Robin
Hi folks. First time posting here. I haven't seen the Blu-Ray yet of Cimarron. Having just watched the DVD recently, it may be a while before I pick it up, but thanks to these positive reviews, I'm looking forward to it.

A note to add to the critical discussion of this film: In my opinion, the reason why this film has fallen out of favor today is because our collective sense of humor has changed. At the time it was released, it was sophisticated satire of the sort that plays differently to different portions of the audience depending on their level of awareness of the world around them. There are queues to this being the case, such as the "Terrific as all creation!" tagline and the over-the-top painting in of Dix in the poster. Ferber said of the novel Cimarron that it was intended as a satirical criticism of American womanhood and American sentimentality. Understanding this is important for getting a proper read on the interactions between Yancey and Sabra, as well as the treatment of ethnic minority characters.
Welcome aboard and thanks for that perspective.

Being an admirer of Hedy Lamarr, I'm intrigued by your chosen name.
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,428
Real Name
Robert Harris
Max Steiner wrote a temporary score (main and end titles) for the picture with the understanding that RKO would get a "name" composer for the actual release. Well, that didn't happen and the film went out with Steiner's music and no credit.
Love the fact that you have this knowledge!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
357,073
Messages
5,130,113
Members
144,282
Latest member
Nielmb
Recent bookmarks
0
Top