Dan Hitchman
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Jun 11, 1999
- Messages
- 2,712
I'm in a quandary.
Is the upcoming Denon 3805 receiver THAT big of a difference between the 3803 in order to justify paying $200-$300 more (considering some places are discounting the 3803)?
Does the 3805 have a better, more robust power supply? Are the sonics that much more refined due to the Alpha 24/192 processing, SHARC Hammerhead DSPs, etc. or will a receiver of this "class" only look good on paper due to other cost cutting measures that aren't used in the venerable 5803 (considered by many to be a great sounding receiver)?
Is there better functionality of the Zone 2 features, and can you play, let's say, a movie in one room while controlling Zone 2 in another room with another source and volume, or is it an "either/or" scenario? How does the 3803 differ in terms of Zone 2, or do they operate the same way?
What do people think of these auto calibration features? Are they truly accurate or is it more bells and whistles?
From the owner's manual, it looks like even with the built in Denon Link and internal DVD-Audio (and possibly) SACD decoding the options are about as limited with having an external universal player doing the decoding (am I wrong?) other than using one CAT5e cable (this is a proprietary interface, and not an open standard) rather than 6 analog. With the chipsets being used, it seems as though SACD still gets the short end of the stick (DSD changed to PCM for bass management, no channel delay, etc.-- or is the receiver acting like a Pioneer Elite receiver with iLink digital interface and there is no PURE DSD decoding available, only PCM conversion?)
Is the ProLogic IIx "all that and a bag of potato chips" or can I do without it?
Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. Thanks!
Dan
Is the upcoming Denon 3805 receiver THAT big of a difference between the 3803 in order to justify paying $200-$300 more (considering some places are discounting the 3803)?
Does the 3805 have a better, more robust power supply? Are the sonics that much more refined due to the Alpha 24/192 processing, SHARC Hammerhead DSPs, etc. or will a receiver of this "class" only look good on paper due to other cost cutting measures that aren't used in the venerable 5803 (considered by many to be a great sounding receiver)?
Is there better functionality of the Zone 2 features, and can you play, let's say, a movie in one room while controlling Zone 2 in another room with another source and volume, or is it an "either/or" scenario? How does the 3803 differ in terms of Zone 2, or do they operate the same way?
What do people think of these auto calibration features? Are they truly accurate or is it more bells and whistles?
From the owner's manual, it looks like even with the built in Denon Link and internal DVD-Audio (and possibly) SACD decoding the options are about as limited with having an external universal player doing the decoding (am I wrong?) other than using one CAT5e cable (this is a proprietary interface, and not an open standard) rather than 6 analog. With the chipsets being used, it seems as though SACD still gets the short end of the stick (DSD changed to PCM for bass management, no channel delay, etc.-- or is the receiver acting like a Pioneer Elite receiver with iLink digital interface and there is no PURE DSD decoding available, only PCM conversion?)
Is the ProLogic IIx "all that and a bag of potato chips" or can I do without it?
Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. Thanks!
Dan