Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Powerpuff Girls DVD - Should I Start A Widescreen Petition?

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 of 15 OFFLINE   DavidS


    Stunt Coordinator

  • 236 posts
  • Join Date: May 24 2001

Posted July 15 2002 - 06:32 AM

hi all.... Now that the Powerpuff Girls Movie is nearing the general end of its theatrical run, should I start a widescreen petition now, in anticipation of its imminent DVD release? I, for one, do NOT want a full-frame only DVD of this title (like the Pokemon films are). Whaddya think?


#2 of 15 OFFLINE   Mark Palermo

Mark Palermo

    Second Unit

  • 366 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 28 2000

Posted July 15 2002 - 06:53 AM

I'll be buying this only if it's in OAR. I only wonder if it's too early to start a petition. Maybe Warners are already planning a widescreen release? Mark
My art imitates crime.

#3 of 15 OFFLINE   Brenton



  • 1,169 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 25 2002

Posted July 15 2002 - 09:59 AM

As soon as I saw the first trailer for this film, I knew it would be one that could be a close call for getting in widescreen when the DVD comes out.

#4 of 15 OFFLINE   StephanieC


    Stunt Coordinator

  • 53 posts
  • Join Date: May 12 2002

Posted July 15 2002 - 10:14 AM

Craig McCracken (the creator/director) is very knowledgable about films and cartoons, so I think he'll make sure there's a widescreen version.
An addict, but a happy one.

#5 of 15 OFFLINE   DerrickRemmert



  • 47 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 10 2002

Posted July 15 2002 - 10:31 AM

I say call Warner Bros up and tell them you want a widescreen version. That would probably work better than a petition.

#6 of 15 OFFLINE   Dave F

Dave F


  • 2,891 posts
  • Join Date: May 15 1999

Posted July 15 2002 - 11:14 AM

Yeah, I don't think petitions mean diddly-squat. Calling/writing is the way to go. -Dave
DVD List

#7 of 15 OFFLINE   DavidS


    Stunt Coordinator

  • 236 posts
  • Join Date: May 24 2001

Posted September 04 2002 - 02:11 AM

Well, Now that specs have been announced, and nowhere do i see that this DVD (even the "theatrical" version) will be in widescreen, NOW do i start a petition?


#8 of 15 OFFLINE   Justin Lane

Justin Lane


  • 2,149 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 18 2000

Posted September 04 2002 - 02:45 AM

[quote] NOW do i start a petition? [quote]
Go for it if you want, you don't need our permission. I don't think it will get much support or do much good but it is better then not trying. I have a feeling that this disc will be available in OAR though. After the Willy Wonka problem, Warner has yet to let us down, so until I see different I will remain confident that the disc will indeed be OAR.


#9 of 15 OFFLINE   Donnie Eldridge

Donnie Eldridge

    Supporting Actor

  • 765 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 03 2001

Posted September 04 2002 - 03:30 AM

I say start one. I'll definitely sign it. I'm looking forward to disc.
Master Poe: Close your eyes. What do you hear?
Caine: I hear the water. I hear the birds.
Master Poe: Do you hear your own heart beat.
Caine: No.
Master Poe: Do you hear the grasshopper, which is at your feet.Caine: Old man, how is it that you hear these things?Master Poe: Young man, how is it...

#10 of 15 OFFLINE   Jeff Kleist

Jeff Kleist

    Executive Producer

  • 11,286 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 04 1999

Posted September 04 2002 - 03:32 AM

No, you shouldn't Online petitions need about 20-30,000 signatures for a studio to even take notice. THEY ARE USELESS As are emails You need to call or snail mail. Otherwise they DO NOT CARE because email/online are too easy WRITTEN petitions with HAND signatures are VERY effective And there's still no proof either way of how Powerpuff is being released

#11 of 15 OFFLINE   James Reader

James Reader


  • 1,465 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 09 2002

Posted February 07 2003 - 09:03 PM

I see Amazon has this movie listed as being released in April 2003 here - but it seems to be priced the same as the current version (the current version is listed as $26.98 right?)

Could this be a new version in widescreen?

They've updated their listing now to show the same details as the existing release - including all supplements and full frame Posted Image
"Would you recommend this movie to a friend?"
"Only if I was friendly with Hitler."

#12 of 15 OFFLINE   Jesse Blough

Jesse Blough

    Second Unit

  • 251 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 25 2002

Posted February 08 2003 - 04:08 AM

Yeah, it's going to be widescreen. And I think with even more extras than the first edition. *Update* Yeah, I just talked to a friend of mine who is "in the know" so to speak, and he says that the new edition is going to be a full blown special edition (with new commentaries and everything) in ever important widescreen. He says there's a good chance it could even be a director's cut. The reason it took so long to get this special edition out was because Warner Brothers didn't want to fund it.

#13 of 15 OFFLINE   Mark_Wilson



  • 1,809 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 27 2000

Posted April 21 2003 - 02:22 PM

This disc comes out tomorrow. Any reviews up yet?

#14 of 15 OFFLINE   Matt Naglieri

Matt Naglieri

    Second Unit

  • 283 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 30 2001

Posted April 21 2003 - 02:32 PM

I believe as of yet there is no widescreen disc coming out here. What amazon lists is either a price reduction or new stock that has just come in. It is a very common practice of amazon to list false information and misrepresent new stock as new releases.

#15 of 15 OFFLINE   James Reader

James Reader


  • 1,465 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 09 2002

Posted April 21 2003 - 11:55 PM

Well it's not a price reduction. It's the same price (this is what started the speculation in the first place)
"Would you recommend this movie to a friend?"
"Only if I was friendly with Hitler."

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users