Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Gravity


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
350 replies to this topic

#301 of 351 OFFLINE   Sean Bryan

Sean Bryan

    Sean Bryan



  • 2,977 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969
  • Real Name:Sean

Posted March 11 2014 - 10:19 AM

Please explain to me which part is ridiculous.

. When you're having a dream or hallucinating, later you never have a clear image of it in your mind. It's not real to you anymore.

Simply untrue, and your complaint is based on that.You must have really been bothered by Fight Club.
I don't believe in transcending the genre, I believe IN the genre - Joss Whedon

#302 of 351 OFFLINE   Aaron Silverman

Aaron Silverman

    Lead Actor



  • 9,911 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 22 1999
  • Real Name:Aaron Silverman
  • LocationFlorida

Posted March 11 2014 - 10:57 AM

That was OK because you weren't supposed to talk about it.


"How wonderful it will be to have a leader unburdened by the twin horrors of knowledge and experience." -- Mr. Wick

#303 of 351 OFFLINE   Tino

Tino

    Producer



  • 6,026 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 1999
  • Real Name:Valentino
  • LocationMetro NYC

Posted March 11 2014 - 01:54 PM

By the way I loved the movie and gave it 10/10 but I hated the dream scene. Broke the atmosphere, the solitude. I'm not against a dream scene, I had a problem with the execution. Too real, too much looked like the rest of the film.

Sam. If you go back and look at that scene again, there are clues that it wasn't real. First, When George Clooney opens the hatch, nothing gets sucked out. Also he doesn't have a backpack, never mind the jet pack. And wouldn't the sudden change in pressure and temperature have killed Sandra Bullock instantly. And she's hyperventilating the whole time while George is breathing normally suggesting that the gauges are still depleting. Subtle hints but they are there. Hopefully this makes you feel better. ;)
It's gonna be a hell of a ride. I'm ready. .

#304 of 351 OFFLINE   DaveF

DaveF

    Moderator



  • 15,134 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 04 2001
  • Real Name:David Fischer
  • LocationOne Loudoun, Ashburn, VA

Posted March 11 2014 - 10:26 PM

Exactly put.

#305 of 351 OFFLINE   Mark Booth

Mark Booth

    Screenwriter



  • 1,112 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 25 1999

Posted March 12 2014 - 01:59 PM

Well, I'm just glad that openly discussing

Spoiler
isn't a spoiler or anything! :rolleyes:

 

Mark



#306 of 351 OFFLINE   Tino

Tino

    Producer



  • 6,026 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 1999
  • Real Name:Valentino
  • LocationMetro NYC

Posted March 12 2014 - 02:08 PM

*
POPULAR

I personally think over five months after a films release you enter a discussion thread at your own risk don't you?I mean what did you think we'd be discussing. ? ;)
It's gonna be a hell of a ride. I'm ready. .

#307 of 351 OFFLINE   DaveF

DaveF

    Moderator



  • 15,134 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 04 2001
  • Real Name:David Fischer
  • LocationOne Loudoun, Ashburn, VA

Posted March 12 2014 - 07:54 PM

16 pages in, you expect to see more than preview details.It was different when movies had separate review and discussion threads. But I haven't seen that much lately.

#308 of 351 OFFLINE   Aaron Silverman

Aaron Silverman

    Lead Actor



  • 9,911 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 22 1999
  • Real Name:Aaron Silverman
  • LocationFlorida

Posted March 13 2014 - 11:46 AM

Personally, I'm kind of torn. I hate unmarked spoilers, period. There are way too many films that I don't get to see right away. Sorry, Mark!

 

I remember when a friend of mine started using an online avatar that gave away the SUPER-SHOCKING final shot of Dexter season 4 when it wasn't even out on DVD yet!

 

Which reminds me of the Dexter season 6 DVD set, which had an unskippable preview that gave away the SUPER-SHOCKING final shot of ITSELF!

 

(Currently watching season 8. . .and they STILL only include closed captions that don't work on modern setups!!!)


"How wonderful it will be to have a leader unburdened by the twin horrors of knowledge and experience." -- Mr. Wick

#309 of 351 OFFLINE   DaveF

DaveF

    Moderator



  • 15,134 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 04 2001
  • Real Name:David Fischer
  • LocationOne Loudoun, Ashburn, VA

Posted March 13 2014 - 07:57 PM

Personally, I'm kind of torn. I hate unmarked spoilers, period. There are way too many films that I don't get to see right away. Sorry, Mark!

I share your feelings. I hate spoilers. I don't even let my wife the "coming next week" teasers at the end of our shows. But (1) there's no way to mark spoilers from mobile browsers and (2) 16 pages into a good conversation, everything is a spoiler and marking it all is tedious to write and tedious to read.

#310 of 351 OFFLINE   SamT

SamT

    Screenwriter



  • 1,014 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 21 2010
  • Real Name:Sam

Posted March 14 2014 - 03:47 AM

Sam. If you go back and look at that scene again, there are clues that it wasn't real.First, When George Clooney opens the hatch, nothing gets sucked out.Also he doesn't have a backpack, never mind the jet pack.And wouldn't the sudden change in pressure and temperature have killed Sandra Bullock instantly. And she's hyperventilating the whole time while George is breathing normally suggesting that the gauges are still depleting.Subtle hints but they are there. Hopefully this makes you feel better. ;)

 

Oh yes, I know. I knew it wasn't real from the first second Clooney showed up even before opening the hatch. I just don't like it in this movie. It's a hard science movie, lets not break the beautiful almost close to real images. It's just my personal opinion.

 

If people still don't get it that it's a dream after he opens the hatch, then it's funny and frightening at the same time! :D


Here since 1999!

trakt is a fun way to see what we watch and rate. Add me if you are in this thread!

 
 

 

 


#311 of 351 OFFLINE   Aaron Silverman

Aaron Silverman

    Lead Actor



  • 9,911 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 22 1999
  • Real Name:Aaron Silverman
  • LocationFlorida

Posted March 14 2014 - 10:45 AM

Oh yes, I know. I knew it wasn't real from the first second Clooney showed up even before opening the hatch. I just don't like it in this movie. It's a hard science movie, lets not break the beautiful almost close to real images. It's just my personal opinion.

 

If people still don't get it that it's a dream after he opens the hatch, then it's funny and frightening at the same time! :D

 

Hard science? Him opening the hatch is about as realistic as the scene where he floats away in the first place! :P


"How wonderful it will be to have a leader unburdened by the twin horrors of knowledge and experience." -- Mr. Wick

#312 of 351 OFFLINE   SamT

SamT

    Screenwriter



  • 1,014 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 21 2010
  • Real Name:Sam

Posted March 19 2014 - 05:12 AM

Hard science?

 

OK, I guess it's not hard science when you see George Clooney and Sandra Bullock as astronauts! :rolleyes:

 

There is another interesting discussion on how the movie would have been if it was not an A-List actor. Someone less known or more believable as an astronaut. I'm still not sure if it would have been better or worse with an unknown.


Here since 1999!

trakt is a fun way to see what we watch and rate. Add me if you are in this thread!

 
 

 

 


#313 of 351 OFFLINE   Johnny Angell

Johnny Angell

    Played With Dinosaurs Member



  • 5,534 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 13 1998
  • Real Name:Johnny Angell
  • LocationCentral Arkansas

Posted March 20 2014 - 08:00 AM

*
POPULAR

I don't get why Clooney or Bullock aren't believable as astronauts.  I had no problem believing Clooney was a veteran astronaut and Bullock was on a first (and maybe only) mission because of her specialized talents.  The space program has had non-pilots go into space.

 

If I had one issue with the movie it was this: I knew the two of them were in for some big-time jeopardy, and with Clooney's character talking about this was his last mission, I knew he was not going to survive the movie.  But that's a nit.  I found it to be an excellent movie.


Johnny
www.teamfurr.org
But a family cat is not replaceable like a wornout coat or a set of tires. Each new kitten becomes its own cat, and none is repeated. I am four cats old, measuring out my life in friends that have succeeded but not replaced one another.--Irving Townsend


#314 of 351 OFFLINE   Vic Pardo

Vic Pardo

    Supporting Actor



  • 804 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 07 2013

Posted March 20 2014 - 10:13 AM

OK, I guess it's not hard science when you see George Clooney and Sandra Bullock as astronauts! :rolleyes:

 

There is another interesting discussion on how the movie would have been if it was not an A-List actor. Someone less known or more believable as an astronaut. I'm still not sure if it would have been better or worse with an unknown.

 

If Cate Blanchett had played Bullock's part, I think I would've gone to see the movie. (And Bullock could have played her part in BLUE JASMINE. Then I would have gone to see that one.  :D )



#315 of 351 OFFLINE   Sean Bryan

Sean Bryan

    Sean Bryan



  • 2,977 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969
  • Real Name:Sean

Posted March 23 2014 - 12:35 PM

Third viewing last night, first at home.God damn, what a beautiful experience! It's been years since I found a movie that moved me like this and I have no doubt that it'll be years before something else does. I was watching some of the making of featurettes, and I was really impressed with the innovations that went into bringing this to life. Really, really impressive.
I don't believe in transcending the genre, I believe IN the genre - Joss Whedon

#316 of 351 OFFLINE   Tino

Tino

    Producer



  • 6,026 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 1999
  • Real Name:Valentino
  • LocationMetro NYC

Posted March 23 2014 - 12:46 PM

Third?? Don't be such a lightweight Sean. ;) I think I've seen it at least 15 times now. And it hasn't lost an ounce of its power. Every once in a while a film comes along and does this to me. The last one was Titanic in 1997 and Dances With Wolves in 1990 before that. Just can't get enough of it. And the extras on the blu are excellent, making the film even more extraordinary considering how difficult it was to make.
It's gonna be a hell of a ride. I'm ready. .

#317 of 351 OFFLINE   Sean Bryan

Sean Bryan

    Sean Bryan



  • 2,977 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969
  • Real Name:Sean

Posted March 23 2014 - 07:40 PM

Ha, yeah. It's weird, but I sometimes try to stay conservative with the number of views of things I really love out of concern that I'll get "desensitized" to it then and they'll lose that emotional impact that makes them special to me. But yeah, I think I need to just get over that. Yes, the difficulty level in what Cuaron had to do to bring this to the screen is insane. I was so taken with the story and experience itself when it was in the theaters that I hadn't dwelled too much on how they actually did it.
I don't believe in transcending the genre, I believe IN the genre - Joss Whedon

#318 of 351 OFFLINE   Jesters Movie Machine

Jesters Movie Machine

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 63 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 30 2014
  • Real Name:Kevin

Posted April 01 2014 - 09:21 PM

I was very impressed with the visuals and the way the movie was filmed.  Overall not my cup of tea.  Great acting though. 



#319 of 351 OFFLINE   Sam Posten

Sam Posten

    Moderator



  • 18,261 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 30 1997
  • Real Name:Sam Posten
  • LocationAberdeen, MD & Navesink, NJ

Posted June 04 2014 - 09:26 AM

Movie sins with special guest NDT!http://nerdapproved....-gravity-video/

I lost my signature and all I got was this Nutter t-shirt

HTF Rules

Classified Sales Rules

UV Sales New Clarifications


#320 of 351 OFFLINE   Vic Pardo

Vic Pardo

    Supporting Actor



  • 804 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 07 2013

Posted February 21 2015 - 07:17 PM

I missed this movie when it played theaters so I caught it on cable tonight for the first time. I have a question about it, followed by a comment.

 

I found a lot of the spinning around of the characters and the constant moving of the camera to be disorienting and discomforting. Luckily I was watching on a 32-inch screen and not in a 3-D IMAX theater where I probably would have gotten dizzy or nauseous. Did anyone who saw this theatrically have that kind of reaction?

 

I found the constant escalation of perils befalling this poor woman to be a tad on the melodramatic side, as well as highly implausible. What was the point of it all? Technically, it’s quite a marvel, but the level of the script was that of a 1970s ABC Disaster Movie of the Week. I need some reason to care and the concept of “Movie Stars in Space” just isn’t enough for me.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users