Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
3D Blu-ray Reviews

Dial M for Murder 3D Blu-ray Review



  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
165 replies to this topic

#1 of 166 OFFLINE   Neil Middlemiss

Neil Middlemiss

    Screenwriter



  • 2,737 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2001
  • Real Name:Neil Middlemiss

Posted October 08 2012 - 12:14 PM

Ranked among the American Film Institute’s Top Ten in the mystery genre, Dial M for Murder is a fine film from the master, Alfred Hitchcock. Based on a play broadcast on the BBC, it is the story of a man scorned, who bided his time evolving the perfect plan to murder his cheating wife and sets it into motion when his wife’s lover comes to visit. The carefully designed plan falters but perhaps not enough to expose the architect. Presented in both 2D and 3D, Warner Brothers bows this Golden Age title for film and 3D enthusiasts alike and the results are favorable.

 

Dial M for Murder 3D
 


Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
Year: 1955
US Rating: PG
Film Length: 105 Minutes
Video: MPEG-4 AVC 1080P High Definition

Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
Audio: English 1.0 DTS-HD Master Audio, French, German, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese Dolby Digital 1.0
Subtitles: English, English SDH, French and Spanish

Release Date: October 9, 2012
Review Date: October 8, 2012
 

“I should simply say that you came here tonight, half-drunk, and tried to borrow money on the strength that we were at college together. When I refused, you mentioned something about a letter belonging to my wife. As far as I could make out, you were trying to sell it to me. I gave you what money I had, and you gave me the letter. It has your fingerprints on it, remember? Then you said if I went to the police you'd tell some crazy story about my wanting you to murder my wife. Before you go any further, old boy, do consider the inconvenience. You see, I'm quite well known, and there'd be pictures of you as well. And sooner or later there'd be a deputation of landladies and lodgers who would step forward and testify as to your character. And someone is almost certain to have seen you with Miss Wallace. You were careful not to be seen around with her, I noticed. You usually met in out-of-the-way places where you wouldn't be recognized.”
 

 

The Film

4 / 5


Tony Wendice, an ex-tennis pro aware of his wife Margot’s adulterous relationship, unveils his meticulously planned plot to kill his wife to Charles Swann, a shady character whom Tony knew from his college days. Every detail thought through and expressed with surprising detachment, Tony essentially entices and blackmails his former acquaintance to pull off the ‘perfect crime’. Margot is a sympathetic character. A lady seemingly torn between her love of Mark Halliday, an American crime author, and the man she married. When Halliday visits the Wendice’s for the weekend, the plot is put into motion.

At one point in the film, after saying that his career as a crime writer would give him the greater chance of pulling of the perfect crime, he concedes that the perfect murder is an impossible pursuit. Regardless of best laid plans, he says, something will always go askew. It is a foreshadowing of what we will witness; what will drive the suspense during the murder attempt and the aftermath. It’s a terrific moment.

Performances are solid across the board with Ray Milland’s commanding performance as Tony Wendice standing out. A curious duplicity is in abundance for these characters, and besides his steely detachment, Milland pulls some sympathy from the audience for his hurt. Grace Kelly is lovely as the unaware wife whose life hangs in the balance at multiple turns throughout the film. She is graceful and vulnerable, never suspecting the maliciousness of her soft-spoken husband. Robert Cummings portrayal as the almost nondescript lover, Mark Halliday, is suitable. A likeable character despite being ‘the other man’, his wide-eyed blissful blindness to Milland’s calculating underhandedness serves the story well enough. The primary investigator, Chief Inspector Hubbard, is played by John Williams in a role which he recreated onscreen following his Tony award winning turn.

Dial M for Murder is delightful Hitchcock, often unfairly dismissed as pedestrian, with a methodical unfolding (or unraveling) of events, mixed expertly with pithy dialogue and tense moments fitting a Hitchcock affair. What it lacks in immediacy and scope it makes up for in intimacy and skill, becoming more intense and interesting as it progresses. Filmed using 3D during the waning days of its popularity, theaters would mostly project the film flat (2D), a shame if for no other reason than the superb attempted murder sequence as Grace Kelly struggles for her life, stretching her hand out desperately for the means to strike back at her attacker. Powerful in 2D it is breathtaking in 3D.  

 

The Video

4/5
 

3D Factor

3.5/5
 

Warner Bros’ presentation of Dial M for Murder in High Definition, framed at 1.85:1 and in 3D for the first time, is good. The colors on display are gorgeous and for a generous portion of the running time, detail is very good and grain intact. Not the most stellar HD presentation of a Hitchcock classic available on Blu-ray, but certainly a most-welcome entry. A few scenes are notably soft and rear projection effects in the film are revealing of the most issues (quite out of place with the projected images being quite poor). Additionally, there are some scenes that show off an odd ringing or halo effect around characters. Research indicates that this effect is inherent to the film stock and not the transfer. Fair enough. But it will raise some questions for viewers not as forgiving or as knowledgeable of such things, so it is good to be prepared.

As Robert Harris points out in his incredibly and perpetually invaluable “A Few Words About…” thread discussing WB’s release, Dial M for Murder has been cleaned up and presented faithfully for us, though the 3D runs a hair dark. Mr. Harris notes that projected, the 3D doesn’t hold up well but on a panel display does better. I viewed Dial M for Murder on my Mitsubishi WD-73738 73-Inch 3D DLP HDTV, a rig that has given me no issues with 3D viewing. So how is the 3D?

My exposure to 3D began in theaters with films like Freddy’s Dead: The Final Nightmare. Not the most noble of beginnings. But ever since Robert Zemeckis’ Beowulf seriously impressed me back in 2007, I felt the advent of 3D had a genuine shot at a second coming. Dial M for Murder then presented me with an opportunity to explore golden age 3D of which I have heard a great deal from HTF’s resident 3D guru, Bob Furmanek and other enthusiasts on the site. Hitchcock employs a number of low angle shots and foreground objects to give a sense of depth in a scene. Given the majority of the film takes place in and around the upscale London apartment (save for a single scene and the odd outside  rear-projection shot as I recall), Hitchcock makes good spacial decisions, generally, and aside from the obvious placement of lamps and such as the camera moves around dialogue heavy scenes, it is subtly achieved.

Dial M for Murder is a patient film, carefully descending into the murderous plot, shocking with the attack itself and descending further into the tense aftermath of whether Mr. Wendice will get away with his plot and improvisations. Aside from the title sequence where the credits protrude from the screen considerably, the attempt of Margot Wendice’s life is the most striking example of 3D in the film. Fingers stretching out toward theaudience in frantic desperation produce a chilling effect, accentuated more by the dimensional film technique. The 3D here is good. The setting doesn’t provide for a varied expression of 3D, but it is effective nonetheless and holds the promise for us fans of 3D that the Golden Age has more great releases to offer. Take note, studios; we’re thirsty for the good stuff regardless of its decade.

 

The Sound

4/5


Warner provides Dial M for Murder with a DTS HD Master Audio English 1.0 soundtrack. The audio is clean, problem free and consistent. The score, composed and conducted by the great Dimitri Tiomkin, is surprisingly melodic and warm given the story’s darker undertones, but it is nicely produced here. Overall the audio works well.

              

The Extras

2/5


Documentary: Hitchcock and Dial M (22:00): Fans in the business (M. Night Shyamalan, Peter Bogdanovich) talk about Hitchcock and the film favorably.


Theatrical Trailer

 

 

 

Overall (Not an average)

4/5


Neil Middlemiss
Kernersville, NC


 


"Equipped with his five senses, man explores the universe around him and calls the adventure Science" – Edwin Hubble
My DVD Collection

#2 of 166 ONLINE   Bob Furmanek

Bob Furmanek

    Producer



  • 3,580 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 10 2001

Posted October 08 2012 - 12:35 PM

Excellent review, Neil. It's good that your first exposure to Golden Age 3-D is also one of the best!

Bob Furmanek

www.3dfilmarchive.com


Bubbleweb_edited-1_zpsc986b444.jpg


#3 of 166 OFFLINE   Adam Gregorich

Adam Gregorich

    Executive Producer



  • 14,888 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 20 1999
  • LocationThe Other Washington

Posted October 08 2012 - 02:18 PM

Thanks Neil.  With all the great titles coming out I had to push this down my list for the next few weeks.  Its encouraging to see some classic 3D titles finally come to market and I will be picking it up.  Hopefully this will encourage other studios to release classic 3D content.



#4 of 166 ONLINE   Ronald Epstein

Ronald Epstein

    Studio Mogul



  • 40,256 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 03 1997

Posted October 08 2012 - 10:09 PM

Amazing how the classic films produce a more satisfying

3D experience over what Hollywood is doing today.


I am snatching up as many of these 3D golden classics as

I possibly can.


 

Ronald J Epstein
Home Theater Forum co-owner

 

 Click Here for the latest/hottest Blu-ray Preorders  Click Here for our complete Blu-ray review archive

 Click Here for our complete 3D Blu-ray review archive Click Here for our complete DVD review archive

 Click Here for Blu-Ray Preorder Release Schedule  Click Here for forum posting rules and regulations


#5 of 166 OFFLINE   Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Archivist



  • 7,553 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted October 09 2012 - 01:06 AM

Originally Posted by Ronald Epstein 

Amazing how the classic films produce a more satisfying

3D experience over what Hollywood is doing today.


I am snatching up as many of these 3D golden classics as

I possibly can.

Dial "M" is a superbly crafted 3D film, with very, very subtle use of the dimensionality, especially at a time when the format was at downward popularity.  Hitchcock, and cinematographer Robert Burks make the 3D seem very natural for the era.  Nothing poking you in the eye.  Until there is a dramatic need.


Modern 3D almost seemed to fall into the same path as that in the early '50s, with accentuated dimensionality, with need.

Until what I consider to be 3D masterpieces -- Avatar and Hugo, neither of which could have been created without digital technology.


RAH


"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#6 of 166 OFFLINE   JamesNelson

JamesNelson

    Second Unit



  • 276 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 12 2008

Posted October 09 2012 - 10:08 AM

My copy of Dial M for Murder arrived today. My initial thoughts: I agree with Mr. Harris in that there is something unnaturally dark about this title. I viewed it on a Panasonic AE-7000 front projector. I played around a bit with trying to boost the levels, but like Mr. Harris was unable to find a satisfying setting and ended up back at my default 3-D calibration. Oddly, the three scenes immediately following the Intermission seem correctly level-balanced, and (to my eyes) stand out in direct contrast to all scenes before and after. At first I thought my eyes had simply adjusted by that point, but I jumped around spot checking and I'm fairly certain I'm not imagining things. The Intermission title card is included, btw. A nice touch. On the positive side, I noticed absolutely no instances of panel mismatches (no vertical misalignment, no rotation or scaling differences between the two sides, no reverse 3-D, etc.). Spot-on stereoscopic registration throughout. Update: I've now given it a quick spin on my DLP RPTV where it fares much better. Also, I didn't notice as dramatic a difference in levels between the 3 post intermission scenes on the DLP as I did on my LCD projector. I believe Mr. Harris is correct in his assessment that this particular title is not well suited to the current crop of LCD 3-D projectors. Or perhaps more accurately: it reveals some of the sort-comings of current LCD 3-D projector technology.

#7 of 166 OFFLINE   JohnS

JohnS

    Producer



  • 4,567 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 17 2001
  • Real Name:John Steffens

Posted October 09 2012 - 12:45 PM

Is anyone else having a problem with Amazon not getting this title today, and having them deliever it by Ontrac. My package says Ontrac is out for delivery, but when I call them they said I can't have my package until the 11th. I really hate Ontrac service.

all-banner.jpg


#8 of 166 OFFLINE   JamesNelson

JamesNelson

    Second Unit



  • 276 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 12 2008

Posted October 09 2012 - 12:49 PM

One more observation: the "music" that plays behind the main menu is probably the oddest, most anachronistic choice imaginable for this film.

#9 of 166 OFFLINE   Todd J Moore

Todd J Moore

    Second Unit



  • 344 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 26 2005
  • Real Name:Todd Moore
  • LocationPhiladelphia, PA

Posted October 09 2012 - 01:59 PM

I'm sincerely not getting why they didn't just use the main title music for the menu. The music on the menu is absolutely the worst thing I've ever played on my blu ray player. As for the image, it looks fine on my TV. So nice to have this in 3D without Japanese subtitles!

Viewing a 3D movie in 2D is kinda like viewing a Scope movie in Pan and Scan.


#10 of 166 OFFLINE   Johnny Angell

Johnny Angell

    Played With Dinosaurs Member



  • 5,338 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 13 1998
  • Real Name:Johnny Angell
  • LocationCentral Arkansas

Posted October 09 2012 - 03:34 PM

I'm sincerely not getting why they didn't just use the main title music for the menu. The music on the menu is absolutely the worst thing I've ever played on my blu ray player. As for the image, it looks fine on my TV. So nice to have this in 3D without Japanese subtitles!

One more observation: the "music" that plays behind the main menu is probably the oddest, most anachronistic choice imaginable for this film.

Oh, man, do I agree with the both of you. Does anyone ever sit down with a disc and just play it and make sure there's nothing wrong with the movie before its released? Was QC using some medical marijuana at the time? It's not even music they're using, just sound effects that belong in front of a very bad sci-fi movie. I've just watched the film and found it to be slightly dark on my Samsung ES7100 LED. However I soon forgot about it as I was enjoying the film. Yes, the 3D is not in-your-face, but it's there to enjoy.
Johnny
www.teamfurr.org
But a family cat is not replaceable like a wornout coat or a set of tires. Each new kitten becomes its own cat, and none is repeated. I am four cats old, measuring out my life in friends that have succeeded but not replaced one another.--Irving Townsend


#11 of 166 OFFLINE   Steve Tannehill

Steve Tannehill

    Producer



  • 5,527 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 06 1997
  • Real Name:Steve Tannehill
  • LocationDFW

Posted October 09 2012 - 03:43 PM

Actually, Grace Kelly's backwards reaching hand was in-your-face, as was the fate of her attacker...

#12 of 166 OFFLINE   Brandon Conway

Brandon Conway

    captveg



  • 7,281 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 30 2002
  • Real Name:Brandon Conway
  • LocationNorth Hollywood, CA

Posted October 09 2012 - 04:08 PM

Originally Posted by Johnny Angell 


Does anyone ever sit down with a disc and just play it and make sure there's nothing wrong with the movie before its released? Was QC using some medical marijuana at the time? It's not even music they're using, just sound effects that belong in front of a very bad sci-fi movie.


Don't blame QC. QC can't change the minds of whoever it was that made the conscious choice to use the main menu "music". It's not as though the audio fidelity of the menu is in error. It's just *bad* music/sound effects. In general, complaints about such things do get made but they will often be disregarded as "by design", i.e., someone signed off on it.


"And now the reprimand, from an American critic. He reproaches me for using film as a sacred & lasting medium, like a painting or a book. He does not believe that filmmaking is an inferior art, but he believes, and quite rightly, that a reel goes quickly, that the public are looking above all for relaxation, that film is fragile and that it is pretentious to express the power of one's soul by such ephemeral and delicate means, that Charlie Chaplin's or Buster Keaton's first films can only be seen on very rare and badly spoiled prints. I add that the cinema is making daily progress and that eventually films that we consider marvelous today will soon be forgotten because of new dimensions & colour. This is true. But for 4 weeks this film [The Blood of a Poet] has been shown to audiences that have been so attentive, so eager & so warm, that I wonder after all there is not an anonymous public who are looking for more than relaxation in the cinema." - Jean Cocteau, 1932


#13 of 166 OFFLINE   Robert Crawford

Robert Crawford

    Moderator



  • 24,848 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 09 1998
  • Real Name:Robert
  • LocationMichigan

Posted October 09 2012 - 09:39 PM

Originally Posted by JamesNelson 

My copy of Dial M for Murder arrived today. My initial thoughts:
I agree with Mr. Harris in that there is something unnaturally dark about this title. I viewed it on a Panasonic AE-7000 front projector. I played around a bit with trying to boost the levels, but like Mr. Harris was unable to find a satisfying setting and ended up back at my default 3-D calibration.
Oddly, the three scenes immediately following the Intermission seem correctly level-balanced, and (to my eyes) stand out in direct contrast to all scenes before and after. At first I thought my eyes had simply adjusted by that point, but I jumped around spot checking and I'm fairly certain I'm not imagining things.
The Intermission title card is included, btw. A nice touch.
On the positive side, I noticed absolutely no instances of panel mismatches (no vertical misalignment, no rotation or scaling differences between the two sides, no reverse 3-D, etc.). Spot-on stereoscopic registration throughout.
Update:
I've now given it a quick spin on my DLP RPTV where it fares much better. Also, I didn't notice as dramatic a difference in levels between the 3 post intermission scenes on the DLP as I did on my LCD projector.
I believe Mr. Harris is correct in his assessment that this particular title is not well suited to the current crop of LCD 3-D projectors. Or perhaps more accurately: it reveals some of the sort-comings of current LCD 3-D projector technology.


It's my belief that these studios don't prepare their products as well as they should for those that have front projectors.  Most negative comments about BR releases seem to come from those with front projectors with large screens while those with smaller displays observe a few problems, but not nearly as much as the projector HT enthusiasts.  I sometimes wonder if that's due to the screen size the people who prepare these BR titles work on????  From what I've seen in the past, most of their screens are not large screens.


Crawdaddy

 

Blu-ray Preorder Schedule

 


#14 of 166 OFFLINE   OliverK

OliverK

    Screenwriter



  • 1,672 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 01 2000

Posted October 09 2012 - 10:48 PM

I sometimes wonder if that's due to the screen size the people who prepare these BR titles work on????  From what I've seen in the past, most of their screens are not large screens.

Very correct, it is my opinion for a long time now that preparation should be on a front projection system of at least 2m width and possibly bigger and with seating 1 screen width away or less. If it looks good from there everybody will be happy. 3D projection is a special case though as 3D makes pictures very very dim, in projection system it is in most cases less than 50% of what is deemed standard for 2D viewing. To compensate for that it is necessary to have different gamma curves somewhere in the sytem, usually either on the Blu-Ray itself or in the display.

#15 of 166 OFFLINE   JamesNelson

JamesNelson

    Second Unit



  • 276 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 12 2008

Posted October 10 2012 - 12:26 AM

...3D projection is a special case though as 3D makes pictures very very dim, in projection system it is in most cases less than 50% of what is deemed standard for 2D viewing. To compensate for that it is necessary to have different gamma curves somewhere in the sytem, usually either on the Blu-Ray itself or in the display.

I believe that the BDA's philosophy in this regard is correct in that 3-D storage implementations and 3-D display implementations should be completely divorced from each other. 3-D content producers should never tweak or target content to one specific display implementation. There are too many different display technologies in the mix and the technology is evolving too rapidly for that. The successor to my 3-D projector that was just released last week is reported to be 20% brighter than my model (which is less than a year old). What looks too dim on my display might look perfectly acceptable on the replacement model. (I only wish I could afford to upgrade every year.) All of that notwithstanding, I still think there is something odd about this particular release. I have a separate set of calibration settings on my projector specifically for 3-D that give me perfectly acceptable results on every other 3-D disc I have viewed. I can't quite put my finger on exactly what the issue is (why so much of the disc seems unnaturally dark). It's far from unwatchable. It's just slightly "wanting".

#16 of 166 OFFLINE   Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Archivist



  • 7,553 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted October 10 2012 - 12:34 AM

Originally Posted by Robert Crawford 


It's my belief that these studios don't prepare their products as well as they should for those that have front projectors.  Most negative comments about BR releases seem to come from those with front projectors with large screens while those with smaller displays observe a few problems, but not nearly as much as the projector HT enthusiasts.  I sometimes wonder if that's due to the screen size the people who prepare these BR titles work on????  From what I've seen in the past, most of their screens are not large screens.

In many cases, correct.  From what I was told, Dial was QC'd on a mid-size flat panel.


Projection for QC -- for all Blu-rays -- should be SOP.


RAH


"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#17 of 166 OFFLINE   Johnny Angell

Johnny Angell

    Played With Dinosaurs Member



  • 5,338 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 13 1998
  • Real Name:Johnny Angell
  • LocationCentral Arkansas

Posted October 10 2012 - 01:30 AM

Don't blame QC. QC can't change the minds of whoever it was that made the conscious choice to use the main menu "music". It's not as though the audio fidelity of the menu is in error. It's just *bad* music/sound effects. In general, complaints about such things do get made but they will often be disregarded as "by design", i.e., someone signed off on it.

The point I tried to make (poorly) was that someone should be reviewing the disc to prevent such incredibly poor choices. If they had shown that menu to 10 randomly chosen people, 9 out of 10 would have said WTF?
Johnny
www.teamfurr.org
But a family cat is not replaceable like a wornout coat or a set of tires. Each new kitten becomes its own cat, and none is repeated. I am four cats old, measuring out my life in friends that have succeeded but not replaced one another.--Irving Townsend


#18 of 166 OFFLINE   Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Archivist



  • 7,553 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted October 10 2012 - 01:42 AM

Originally Posted by Johnny Angell 

The point I tried to make (poorly) was that someone should be reviewing the disc to prevent such incredibly poor choices. If they had shown that menu to 10 randomly chosen people, 9 out of 10 would have said WTF?

Which is precisely how I felt.


Annoying, and painful to the ear.


All dozen or so times, that I had to go back and re-vist this disc, going from 2 to 3D.


Without a doubt, the worst conceivable audio over a menu screen in the short history of mankind.


RAH


"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#19 of 166 ONLINE   Charles Smith

Charles Smith

    Extremely Talented Member



  • 4,232 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 27 2007
  • LocationNor'east

Posted October 10 2012 - 02:04 AM

Will have my copy in a day or so.


In the meantime, reading the comments about the menu's environmental damage, I keep forgetting this is Warner.  Of course it's Warner.  But I keep thinking it must be Universal, playing "Funeral March of a Marionette" on a kazoo accompanied by synth.  Is it even worse than that?



#20 of 166 OFFLINE   JamesNelson

JamesNelson

    Second Unit



  • 276 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 12 2008

Posted October 10 2012 - 02:09 AM

Will have my copy in a day or so. In the meantime, reading the comments about the menu's environmental damage, I keep forgetting this is Warner.  Of course it's Warner.  But I keep thinking it must be Universal, playing "Funeral March of a Marionette" on a kazoo accompanied by synth.  Is it even worse than that?

It's some weird techno-crap with a ringing phone as it principle motif, played over a very bland and uninspired menu. The DVD menu was witty and elegant.





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: 3D Blu-ray Reviews

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users