Mike Thomass
Stunt Coordinator
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2003
- Messages
- 209
im guessing 2 lower quality subs would not equate to 1 quality sub, but not sure. of course, we would have to quantify what 'lower quality' means, and what 'quality' means, but anyway.
heres the deal:
im trying to put together a system.
ive seen many good things said about the bic f12 and v-1220, and the pricing on these is nice. was seriously considering those.
but, im pretty certain i will be buying svs speakers, and svs of course has good rep on its subs as well, so i was going to just get an svs sub. then i saw the prices, and the svs sub (PC12 NSD) would be more than triple the cost of the bic.
so first off, the bics appear to be so highly regarded around here, would 1 of them be a suitable replacement for the PC12 NSD, or is the SVS line too fantastic?
secondly, would a dual bic setup somehow produce better results than the single svs unit?
also, i am implying that the bic product is 'lesser quality' only for the purposes of my questions. for all i know, bic is the quality sub and svs is the lesser.
any advice/info on this would be appreciated.
thanks
heres the deal:
im trying to put together a system.
ive seen many good things said about the bic f12 and v-1220, and the pricing on these is nice. was seriously considering those.
but, im pretty certain i will be buying svs speakers, and svs of course has good rep on its subs as well, so i was going to just get an svs sub. then i saw the prices, and the svs sub (PC12 NSD) would be more than triple the cost of the bic.
so first off, the bics appear to be so highly regarded around here, would 1 of them be a suitable replacement for the PC12 NSD, or is the SVS line too fantastic?
secondly, would a dual bic setup somehow produce better results than the single svs unit?
also, i am implying that the bic product is 'lesser quality' only for the purposes of my questions. for all i know, bic is the quality sub and svs is the lesser.
any advice/info on this would be appreciated.
thanks