Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Photo
- - - - -

Mini-DV Camcorders Vs. Mini-DVD Camcorders


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 of 8 OFFLINE   Neil Middlemiss

Neil Middlemiss

    Producer



  • 3,070 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2001
  • Real Name:Neil Middlemiss

Posted June 12 2007 - 02:48 AM

I got a question from a good friend that I did not know how to answer - does anyone have any idea what the truth is??? "I talked with the guy at Ritz Camera and he said the picture quality of the Mini-DV camcorders is better than that of the Mini-DVD because the picture doesn’t have to be compressed into a smaller medium and also the tapes will provide you with more recording time (mini DVD’s only provide 30 minutes)." Any help or guidence is most appreciated !!!
"Equipped with his five senses, man explores the universe around him and calls the adventure Science" – Edwin Hubble
My DVD Collection

#2 of 8 OFFLINE   Cameron Yee

Cameron Yee

    Executive Producer



  • 10,938 posts
  • Join Date: May 09 2002
  • Real Name:Cameron Yee
  • LocationSince 2006

Posted June 12 2007 - 03:48 AM

All true. The other issue with DVD camcorders is that many editing applications (at least at this juncture) can't import the footage and the camcorder may not even have a firewire port. There are ways around it, but it's definitely not convenient. DVD camcorders are really a convenience product (ironically) for those who don't want to edit and just want to go from camcorder to playback in a DVD player. Personally, I think they are a horrible stop-gap idea as we wait for hard drive recording to replace tape. The first thing I ask someone considering a DVD camcorder is whether they will want to edit the footage. If they say they do, then they're better off getting a miniDV or HDD camcorder (though these also seem to have middling compatibility with editing apps, though this will change in time).

#3 of 8 OFFLINE   Neil Middlemiss

Neil Middlemiss

    Producer



  • 3,070 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2001
  • Real Name:Neil Middlemiss

Posted June 12 2007 - 05:23 AM

Thanks Cameron!!!!
"Equipped with his five senses, man explores the universe around him and calls the adventure Science" – Edwin Hubble
My DVD Collection

#4 of 8 OFFLINE   Bryan X

Bryan X

    Producer



  • 3,469 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 10 2003

Posted June 13 2007 - 04:42 AM

I'll just chime in too. As mentioned, if you are going to edit at all, go Mini-DV. That way you'll be working with uncompressed footage.

#5 of 8 OFFLINE   ManW_TheUncool

ManW_TheUncool

    Producer



  • 5,888 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 18 2001
  • Real Name:ManW

Posted June 13 2007 - 07:20 AM

They *all* use compression of some sort/degree though miniDV just happens to be the overall best option if you want to edit the footages. _Man_

Just another amateur learning to paint w/ "the light of the world".

"Whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is of good repute, if there is any excellence and if anything worthy of praise, dwell on these things..." (Apostle Paul)


#6 of 8 OFFLINE   Bryan X

Bryan X

    Producer



  • 3,469 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 10 2003

Posted June 13 2007 - 08:33 AM

Doing a little reading it looks like MiniDV uses DV25 compression which has a constant data rate of 25Mbps. MPEG2 has a much lower data rate, doesn't it? Is that the reason for the better quality on MiniDV?

#7 of 8 OFFLINE   JohnRice

JohnRice

    Lead Actor



  • 8,637 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 20 2000
  • Real Name:John

Posted June 13 2007 - 11:02 AM

I think the main point is that the DVD format is intended to be the final product only. It is expressly intended to give maximum compression at the sacrifice of the ability to return to an editable format without pretty significant loss of image quality. Personally, the whole idea of recording to DVD in a camera always seemed foolish to me and the result of marketing minded manufacturing. Might as well produce a mostly useless product so long as it sounds good. Besides, I always wondered about the reliability of recording to DVD in a unit that will be jostled often.

The Hybrid System

The Music Part: Emotiva XSP-1, Thiel CS 3.6, Emotiva XPA-2, Marantz SA8004, Emotiva ERC-3, SVS PB-12 Plus 2

The Surround Part: Sherbourn PT-7030, Thiel SCS3, Emotiva XPA-5, Polk & Emotiva Surrounds.


#8 of 8 OFFLINE   Scott Merryfield

Scott Merryfield

    Executive Producer



  • 11,043 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 16 1998
  • LocationMichigan

Posted June 13 2007 - 01:32 PM

I've wondered the same thing, only for a slightly different reason. I've experienced numerous disc writing failures when burning my own DVD's, whether from TV shows recorded to a standalone player or home videos created from my MiniDV camcorder. Each instance left me with an unusable coaster. The media does not seem to be as reliable as tape when used as the original source of the recording. I would be very upset if a DVD-R failed when attempting to capture a once in a lifetime moment on a camcorder. I have yet to have a tape fail in such an instance when using 8mm, Hi8mm and MiniDV over the years.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users