Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

- - - - -

are we ready for an animated series where the characters age?

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#1 of 27 OFFLINE   EricW



  • 2,309 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 01 2001

Posted January 27 2007 - 06:56 AM

just read an article on "King of the Hill" at CNN, celebrating it's 11th season. and Hank is still the same, Bobby is still 11 or 12 and Luanne is still 18. i used to watch this season faithfully on DVD until a couple years ago, when it just didn't seem as funny. still, i remember it fondly and one day i might revisit it. anyways i was just wondering why they don't make a series where the characters age. yes the whole "if it works, don't fix it" mantra goes, but we've seen the birth (and subsequent stagnation) of serials on prime time (Lost, Heroes, Invasion, Smith, etc); networks seem to want to try something new sometimes. an animated series in "real time" might be a good marketing gimmick. or has there already been one?
"now, if that's a fact, tell me... am i lying?"

#2 of 27 OFFLINE   Mike~Sileck


    Supporting Actor

  • 510 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 28 2004

Posted January 27 2007 - 07:27 AM

I think there are a lot more problems associated with this beyond the "will audiences accept it" factor. Learning to draw 100,000 different poses of Bart Simpson is hard enough when hes the same age, height, hair style, etc. Add the infinite multiplier known as "aging" and the artistic part of the show's difficulty would multiply exponentially.... That being said, I'm all for this idea. It gets old watching the Simpsons and Family Guy knowing that no matter what, next episode, everything will be back to normal....
Playstation Network:

#3 of 27 OFFLINE   Adam Lenhardt

Adam Lenhardt

    Executive Producer

  • 14,878 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 16 2001
  • LocationAlbany, NY

Posted January 27 2007 - 07:48 AM

The only animated serial I've ever seen where the characters age is "For Better or For Worse"

#4 of 27 OFFLINE   TonyD


    Who do we think I am?

  • 16,461 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 01 1999
  • Real Name:Tony D.
  • LocationDisney World and Universal Florida

Posted January 27 2007 - 08:46 AM

was there an animated version of better or worse? the strip has all the characters aging, and dieing, getting married etc.

#5 of 27 OFFLINE   Adam Lenhardt

Adam Lenhardt

    Executive Producer

  • 14,878 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 16 2001
  • LocationAlbany, NY

Posted January 27 2007 - 09:09 AM


#6 of 27 ONLINE   TravisR


    Studio Mogul

  • 23,032 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2004
  • LocationThe basement of the FBI building

Posted January 27 2007 - 10:38 AM

I think it's a good idea in theory but I don't really think any show that's currently running should try it. Maybe if they do it like South Park and age their characters by one year (and that was done mostly for the joke that animated shows never have aging) but I don't think I'd have wanted to see Bart Simpson age from 10 to 28 over the run of The Simpsons. All that being said, I think it'd be neat if a new show tried something like that. Although the show would have to run for quite a long time to have any 'growing' occur.

#7 of 27 OFFLINE   seanOhara


    Supporting Actor

  • 820 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 09 2005

Posted January 27 2007 - 11:13 AM

I'd really like to see the Simpsons have another flashback episode to the early days of Homer and Marge's marriage -- except now the early days are c.1997, and Lisa points out that she remembers stuff that happened that year.
My Blog
Les Miserables Volume 1 with my reading of "Four and Four"
Librivox Short Story Collection 34 with my reading of Jack London's "War"

#8 of 27 OFFLINE   Jason Seaver

Jason Seaver

    Lead Actor

  • 9,306 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969

Posted January 27 2007 - 12:55 PM

Why? I imagine this is one of the things animation frees producers from. If you want characters aging, live action lets you do that without extra hassle.
Jay's Movie Blog - A movie-viewing diary.
Transplanted Life: Sci-fi soap opera about a man placed in a new body, updated two or three times a week.
Trading Post Inn - Another gender-bending soap, with different collaborators writing different points of view.

"What? Since when was this an energy...

#9 of 27 OFFLINE   Arild


    Supporting Actor

  • 734 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 15 2003

Posted January 28 2007 - 01:20 AM

I don't think it's a question of "being ready for it", but more of a question of "why the heck would you want it??". Really, what's the point? The fact that you can keep the cast consistant with little or no change - aging or otherwise - is one of the greatest strengths of an animated series. You think The Simpsons would have lasted 18 seasons if the characters aged in real time? (Hint: No!) If you want to see aging and progressing, watch any long-running live action show.

#10 of 27 OFFLINE   todd s

todd s

    Lead Actor

  • 6,996 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 08 1999

Posted January 28 2007 - 02:00 AM

In a similar note. I was involved with a discussion in a comic forum. About whether the heroes (ie-Bats, Supes,etc) should age and eventually new replacements come in. My problem with this. Is that their is something comforting to the fact that my great grandson will still be able to watch and/or read about Bruce Wayne as Batman and Clark Kent as Superman. I am not sure why. I know eventually the Batmobile will be some real futuristic car. Just like the one now might seem to readers back in the 1940's. Who knows Bats may end up like the tech from Batman Beyond. But, he should always be Bruce Wayne...who saw his parents killed in an alley as a child and grew up to stop criminals. And Supes should always be Kal-El the last son of Krypton who was adopted by the Kents of Kansas. Not some clone or son of him and Lois (Or Wonder Woman Posted Image )
Bring back John Doe! Or at least resolve the cliff-hanger with a 2hr movie or as an extra on a dvd release.

#11 of 27 OFFLINE   RickER



  • 5,130 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 04 2003
  • Real Name:Rick
  • LocationTulsa, Oklahoma

Posted January 28 2007 - 02:01 AM

I am sure Paramount wishes Shatner and Nimoy were 35 instead of 75.

#12 of 27 OFFLINE   Chris


    Lead Actor

  • 6,790 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 04 1997

Posted January 28 2007 - 03:10 AM

I think having animated characters age isn't something that is a matter of "are we ready for" it almost belies the point. Having characters age in animation instills them with a bit of reality. Animated characters are designed in such a way completely irrational and insane things happen that could not physically happen in the real world. That is to say, I've never seen space aliens come down and debate how to play a jazz trombone. And I don't recall anyone getting radiation poisoned repeatedly and then going home with hands that made everything they touch glow. We expect animated characters to do the insane - and to entertain us. I want them to be somewhat like us, but the fact that they are clearly not makes it easier for me to buy in and play along. If characters on these shows started to age, it's not just them who would change, but their surroundings would also have to show impact of time passing, etc. That's the thing with a sitcom or even a drama.. there aren't a lot of sets. If the Groening's creative vision wants them to age, that's fine. I know South Park has allowed their characters to grow another year since the beginning.
My Current DVD-Profiler

"I've been Ostrafied!" - Christopher, Sopranos 5/6/07

#13 of 27 OFFLINE   ChristopherDAC



  • 3,729 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 18 2004

Posted January 28 2007 - 03:28 AM

The longest running animated TV programme in the world is surely Sazae-san, the Japanese soap opera, which has been on the air continuously since 1969, and is based on a comic strip which first appeared in 1946. I would find it interesting to see how that show has reacted to changes in the world, considering that the first strips incorporated themes such as food rationing under the Occupation.

#14 of 27 OFFLINE   DeathStar1



  • 3,291 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 28 2001

Posted January 28 2007 - 03:53 AM

Lets not forget Dragonball and it's incarnations.

Starts off with just bulma and Goku as kids, then it expands to grandma bulma, grandpa goku and a whole wide range of family b ased characters. One reason why I like the show so much Posted Image.

#15 of 27 OFFLINE   EricW



  • 2,309 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 01 2001

Posted January 28 2007 - 04:41 AM

if you go to the Simpsons thread, all you read is people complaining about how the show has lost it, harking back to the "golden years". now i'm not saying the SImpsons should age, since that show is so deeply rooted in fantasy, but a show like King of the Hill, which is practically a live action sitcom that's been animated, might be interesting.
well, that's what art and invention is all about. what you may view as a constraint may be an inspiration. before a series like "24" came along, there weren't really any real-time shows. why? because the video medium's strength is being able to tell as story by jumping forward in time to efficiently make its biggest impact. following a clock would be a huge contstraint and be impractical. yet "24" works because of it, not in spite of it. you couldn't make a superhero series like Superman or Batman age in real time, which is why you make a series like Heroes. Mika (a kid character) will no doubt age. only because he's played by a human, if Heroes was a serious comic book by Alan Moore or the like, would you fault the fact that he ages, or view it as a weakness to the story?
"now, if that's a fact, tell me... am i lying?"

#16 of 27 OFFLINE   MishaLauenstein


    Supporting Actor

  • 590 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 04 2002
  • Real Name:Misha Lauenstein
  • LocationVancouver, BC

Posted January 28 2007 - 06:43 AM

Also firing all the women in your cast and bringing in all men to replace them is a bit of a bad PR move.
40% Ben Katz + 30% Bobby Hill (Texas) + 20% Monica Geller + 10% William Dent. (Wardrobe by George Costanza)

#17 of 27 OFFLINE   TonyD


    Who do we think I am?

  • 16,461 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 01 1999
  • Real Name:Tony D.
  • LocationDisney World and Universal Florida

Posted January 28 2007 - 07:31 AM

what show was that?

#18 of 27 OFFLINE   Scott_J



  • 2,635 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 17 2000

Posted January 28 2007 - 08:30 AM

I don't think that's actually happened, but what Misha was probably referring to was the fact that a lot of boys (most, if not all, on the Simpsons; Bobby Hill to name some) on cartoons are voiced by women and if they were to age and become men, they would probably have to have men voicing them, thus replacing the women who current do the voices.

#19 of 27 OFFLINE   Greg_S_H


    Executive Producer

  • 15,054 posts
  • Join Date: May 09 2001
  • Real Name:Greg
  • LocationNorth Texas

Posted January 28 2007 - 08:32 AM

DC actually does it with some degree of regularity, with Batman and Superman being notably exempt (though, they have been supplanted for brief periods). The main Green Lantern isn't the original, the main Flash isn't the original, and there are others. In both of those examples, the originals are much older now (typically, they have the Reed Richards gray at the temple to show their age).

#20 of 27 OFFLINE   Jeff Jacobson

Jeff Jacobson


  • 2,116 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 24 2001

Posted January 28 2007 - 11:00 AM

Joseph Gribble has aged on King of the Hill.
Posted ImagePosted Image

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users