Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

Combat! - Season 2


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
3 replies to this topic

#1 of 4 OFFLINE   Randy A Salas

Randy A Salas

    Screenwriter



  • 1,348 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 25 2002

Posted November 05 2004 - 04:27 PM

I hesitate to fuel the negativity that seems to dominate every thread on this board, but for purely informational purposes:

The episodes on the second-season Combat! DVDs continue to average about 47 minutes each, just as on the first-season collections. Like those episodes, they are probably taken from time-compressed prints, not edited from their original length of about 49-50 minutes. This is based on my sampling various episodes on the upcoming discs, which I received a few days ago.

For folks who are old enough to understand the reference, this level of time compression is about the equivalent of playing a 33 1/3 RPM record at 34 2/3 to 35 RPM. That's not that noticeable to most people, but it's there nonetheless.
Randy A. Salas
DVD Columnist & Feature Writer
Minneapolis Star Tribune daily newspaper

#2 of 4 OFFLINE   James Landau

James Landau

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 116 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 09 2001

Posted November 05 2004 - 10:40 PM

Randy, my objection to time compression is not the actual speed up per se, but rather the artifacts that the Lexicon process leaves behind. The process does attempt to maintain pitch while performing the speed up so audio artifacts are minimal unless they really crank up the compression. The video artifacts are a whole other matter unfortunately. They are extremely visible and annoying and only become worse as the compression increases. The effects can most easily be seen in areas with fine, high contrast detail.

If you've ever noticed the closing credits of an old, syndicated movie cycling between slightly blurred and sharp or the thickness of horizontal lines on letters such as T or A cycling between two different widths, then you've seen the results of time compression. In my opinion, it's far more noticeable and annoying than the edge enhancement that many people complain about.

#3 of 4 OFFLINE   Chuck_W

Chuck_W

    Second Unit



  • 397 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 07 2003

Posted November 06 2004 - 01:45 AM

Thanks Randy....any info you provide on the set is welcome and appreciated.

#4 of 4 OFFLINE   Randy A Salas

Randy A Salas

    Screenwriter



  • 1,348 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 25 2002

Posted November 06 2004 - 02:00 AM

Quote:
Randy, my objection to time compression is not the actual speed up per se, but rather the artifacts that the Lexicon process leaves behind.


This is a valid point. It's most noticeable when a viewer pauses the disc and there's a slight (or obvious) blur to the image just about anywhere it's paused. This is akin to the effects of a PAL-to-NTSC conversion. Again, though, it's more obvious to some people, especially those who know what to look for, than others. This is not to minimize the issue but to explain why some viewers are affected more by it.

Quote:
Thanks Randy....any info you provide on the set is welcome and appreciated.

You're welcome, Chuck.

Image obviously has a production cost and price point that it has targeted for these DVDs, and they don't include demanding and restoring/remastering from the original prints. I had hoped that Image might try a new approach to the second-season set, but sales of the first season appear to have dictated that nothing changes.

It should be noted that a common refrain related to these old ABC-produced movies and TV shows is that Disney won't provide anything but these modified masters, so I'm not sure if there's any other option for the licensees, like MGM and Image.
Randy A. Salas
DVD Columnist & Feature Writer
Minneapolis Star Tribune daily newspaper





Forum Nav Content I Follow