-

Jump to content



Photo
DVD Reviews

HTF Review: Van Helsing



This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
146 replies to this topic

#1 of 147 Jason Perez

Jason Perez

    Second Unit

  • 310 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 06 2003

Posted October 13 2004 - 01:46 AM

Posted Image


Van Helsing





Studio: Universal
Year: 2004
Rated: PG-13
Running Time: 132 minutes
Aspect Ratio: Anamorphic Widescreen (1.85:1)
Captions: English
Subtitles: French and Spanish
Audio: English – Dolby Digital 5.1, French & Spanish – Stereo Surround (2.0)




Release Date:
October 19th, 2004



In the early 1930s, as the horror genre came into its own, Universal Studios wasted little time in giving movie patrons more of the thrills and chills that they were craving. Indeed, within a single decade, a trio of films that has been entertaining horror fans for over 70 years burst onto the big screen - Dracula, starring the incomparable Bela Lugosi, James Whale’s Frankenstein, featuring the “uncanny” Boris Karloff, and The Wolf Man, which starred Lon Chaney. Jr.

In recent years, horror films have seen a bit of a revival, and Universal has returned to its horror roots to a degree, largely due to the efforts of a young filmmaker named Stephen Sommers, who helmed both The Mummy and The Mummy Returns. Not content to stop with remaking the Mummy for a modern audience, Mr. Sommers bravely decided to roll his version of the aforementioned trio of monsters into one film, where they are pitted against the infamous vampire killer Gabriel Van Helsing (Hugh Jackman). Of course, those familiar with the classics will no doubt notice that Van Helsing’s name has been changed from Abraham to Gabriel in this film.

Unfortunately, although this idea sounded immensely appealing with Sommers at the helm (I thought his first Mummy was an awful lot of fun), Van Helsing ended up being a major disappointment on many fronts. The biggest problem is that Sommers appears to be following in the footsteps of George Lucas, whose recent films are all about style over substance. More specifically, though this film has some dazzling set design (it really is imaginative) and sounds great, the characters are just not very interesting or memorable, the dialogue is atrocious, and the abilities of Industrial Light and Magic are relied upon far too much. Let me say that as this is clearly a “popcorn” movie, I was in no way expecting a cinematic masterpiece, but Van Helsing is simply devoid of the heart and sense of fun that made Sommers’ version of The Mummy such a likeable film.

Obviously intended to be the first film in a potentially lucrative franchise, Van Helsing is interesting in one way – it reveals a much different side of the illustrious Van Helsing than we are used to seeing. More precisely, Stephen Sommers takes us back in time to 1887-1888, an early portion of the worldly and educated scientist’s career, when he was a fearless bad-ass who mercilessly hunted the forces of evil for the Knights of the Holy Order, a secret society made up of leaders from all religions.

Shortly after the film opens, with a neat fight between Van Helsing and Mr. Hyde, our hero is sent to Transylvania by the Knights’ leadership. Basically, his mission is to bring Count Dracula’s (Richard Roxburgh) afterlife to an end before he can complete an experiment that will allow vampires to populate the globe. It seems Dracula wants to procreate, and is trying to locate the Frankenstein monster (Shuler Hensley), who is the key to the machinery that will give everlasting life to thousands of his offspring. And as if battling Dracula were not enough of a challenge, Van Helsing must also contend with the werewolf in league with him and his three harpy wives.

Fortunately, our distinguished hero has some help on this most dangerous of quests, in the form of a beautiful Transylvanian vampire hunter named Anna Valerious (Kate Beckinsale) and the trusty Friar Carl (David Wenham), who provides a variety of cool-looking gear and weaponry for Van Helsing to use as he battles the forces of evil. Naturally, however, since the Count is the granddaddy of vampires, these gizmos and gadgets prove ineffective, and the protagonists soon realize that no one knows how to kill Dracula. Can Van Helsing and company finally find a way, or will humankind drop a step in the food chain, as the Count’s plan to birth a race of vampires comes to fruition?

Not wanting to provide too much detail on the plot, my description of the story will end there. I will, however, tell you why I had some serious problems with Van Helsing. The first thing that comes to mind is that despite a story containing three of film history’s most frightening and creepy characters, Stephen Sommers’ movie contains little more than a handful of scares (and even those are cheap and obvious). Instead, Van Helsing assaults the senses with almost endless action/chase sequences, most of which are so repetitive they quickly wear out their welcome. This is not a good thing in a 90-minute action/horror flick, much less one that runs for 132 minutes! Even worse, I found the expository sequences that tie the action set pieces together to be unbelievably shallow and dull.

Yet another big problem for me was that although the set design was fabulous, a lot of things in Van Helsing, including the CGI monsters, the stunts, and even the CGI sets, “feel” fake, so it was impossible for me to suspend disbelief at times. Indeed, Stephen Sommers injects computerized images of one sort or another into nearly every shot, but it seemed to me as though they really did not do anything to enhance the story. In my case, instead of seamlessly blending CG with traditional effects to create a believable world, a la Peter Jackson’s Middle Earth, the overuse of CGI in Van Helsing actually took me out of it.

Unfortunately, Sommers integration of humor into this film is also far less effective than it was in his Mummy pictures. In fact, I thought most of the things that were funny about Van Helsing were not intended to be a source of laughter. In my opinion, although interactions between Friar Carl and Frankenstein’s monster generated a few humorous moments, almost all of the scripted comedy in this film is uninspired and lifeless, not to mention unfunny. And the weaponry Van Helsing uses…sure, it looks cool but come on!

The performances are no less up-and-down than anything else in this film. As always, Hugh Jackman does fine work as the title character, but some of those surrounding him are surprisingly inept. The most glaring example is Kate Beckinsale, who is a decent actress, but was absolutely horrible as Anna Vaerlious. To be sure, I attribute some of this to the dialogue spoken by her character, including such gems as how her people “…look on the brighter side of death.” Posted Image, but she definitely didn’t do much to help this film from sliding headlong into the jaws of failure.

An almost equal disappointment was Richard Roxburgh, who was great in Moulin Rouge, but ridiculously over-the-top as Count Vladislaus Dracula. Conversely, Shuler Hensley, who gives the Frankenstein monster a lot of humanity, and David Wenham, who is amusing Friar Carl, turn in commendable performances. Too bad their efforts are lost in the overabundance of CGI, stilted dialogue, and repetitive action sequences.

Finally, I think that Stephen Sommers, who proved so adept at turning in a solid action/horror film with The Mummy, was off his game here, even more so than in The Mummy Returns. This is especially true of the buildup of romantic tension between Anna Valerious and Van Helsing, which is handled horribly through some truly contrived fighting. I also grew weary of how the title character did not show a single ounce of fear, even when confronted with bloodthirsty undead monsters that are much larger, faster, and stronger than human beings. Perhaps I am being overly critical, but when “heroes” appear to be unflinching in the face of such grave danger, I find it hard to feel any tension or dread myself.

Perhaps I am being overly critical, but I really had hoped for a much different outcome for Stephen Sommers’ Van Helsing. As I said, I thought the concept had a lot of promise, but the end result seems to me to be a perfect example of a film that places far too much emphasis on style, at the expense of its substance. Certainly, there are people out there who liked this film (hell, my wife did!), and I completely respect your opinions…but I do not share them. As such, I hope you will forgive me if I do not celebrate when they announce the inevitable sequel (this film has grossed several hundred million dollars worldwide).







SO, HOW DOES IT LOOK?
Presented in its original 1.85:1 aspect ration, anamorphically enhanced for widescreen displays, Van Helsing’s transfer is just about perfect, highlighted by bold, smoothly-rendered colors and blacks that are, well, black. Many environments in the film are completely digital creations, and there are a great many of night shots in the film, but even in these challenging environments the image is clear, extremely well defined, and completely free of compression artifacts, grain, and video noise.

Hell, even though a lot of this film looks artificial, the superb set design, Allen Daviau’s imaginative cinematography, and some jaw-dropping aerial shots are reproduced in all of their glory on this disc. Again, there is so much detail throughout that it is nearly unbelievable! Just look around Frankenstein’s laboratory or the Knights of the Holy Order’s shop in the Vatican, for instance, where detail is so precise that you can see every weird-looking, cobweb-covered device or instrument with crystal clarity!

The opening sequence, shot in black-and-white, also looks magnificent, with just about perfect contrast, a smooth grayscale, and deep blacks. Honestly, I can’t say enough about this transfer – but its clarity does come at a price, as a little more attention is drawn to some of the more “fake”-looking CGI effects. Other than that, which is no fault of the transfer, Van Helsing looks stunning on DVD!




WHAT IS THAT NOISE?
While listening to this film’s soundtrack, it should be patently obvious – a lot of care was spent making Van Helsing a loud, boisterous aural experience. Happily, although this movie is simply screaming for a DTS mix, the 5.1 channel Dolby Digital offering included holds its own pretty well.

To begin with, the soundstage is absolutely gigantic, but it also exhibits a wonderful sense of balance and extremely precise imaging, even as all hell breaks loose around the protagonists! Almost as impressive was how dialogue remained discernable, even during the very busiest of scenes, so listeners never have to strain to hear what is being said.

Of course, the sound effects in Van Helsing, which include weapons fire and a variety of monster noises, will give your system quite a workout. With that in mind, it is some of the environmental effects, particularly thunder, which do the best job of showcasing the soundtrack’s powerful, and yet extremely tight, bass response.

Finally, I would be remiss not to mention Alan Silvestri’s dynamic score, which is wonderful mixture of sounds/instruments both old and new! In terms of how it is reproduced for the home, I had no complaints, as Silvestri’s compositions are spread nicely throughout the sound field, and boast excellent fidelity! Would you expect anything less from a big-budget, “Sommersized” production?

To sum things up, this Dolby Digital mix has great atmospherics during quiet scenes, dialogue is presented in fine fashion, and when it is called for, it will most certainly remind you that you are watching an absurdly expensive action film! Again, I would have LOVED to have a DTS track on here, given that Universal puts it on fare that doesn’t really require it, like Meet the Parents, but this will do for now.





EXTRAS, EXTRAS!!!


Audio Commentary #1
The first audio commentary for Van Helsing is contributed by director Stephen Sommers and producer Bob Ducsay, who offer their thoughts on the film a week before it debuted in theaters. After listening intently to their comments for 2 hours and 12 minutes, I can safely say that both men are chatty, both men appear enthusiastic about this film, and both men say very little of real interest about the film!

Indeed, this commentary is surprisingly screen-specific, with Sommers and Ducsay touching on the visual techniques used, and location information on only a very superficial level. I also grew irritated with how much pleasure Sommers seemed to take in telling listeners how big and grand his films are, and that ILM has coined the term “Sommersizing” for the work they have done on his films.

In all honesty, I do not think that most people will find this track interesting enough to spend over two hours of time with it, but if your opinion on the film differs from mine, you may find it worthwhile. Some of the few highlights (for me) were:

--- Mr. Sommers chatting (very briefly) about the genesis of the story, and how he prodded himself into fully fleshing out the script. Interesting as insight into how he comes up with stories.

--- Bob Ducsay pointing out some of the continuity errors in the film, and revealing (along with Stephen Sommers) some of the homages paid to other films in Van Helsing.

--- Brief discussions about the reasons why Hugh Jackman was cast, which apparently had nothing to do with his work on the X-Men films.

--- Stephen Sommers talking about how he went about answering the question “Why does Dracula cast no reflection in mirrors?”. I must admit, although I did not like the film, I thought his approach to this question was very creative, as I have always wondered the same thing.


Audio Commentary #2
The second, and more interesting audio commentary for Van Helsing features the musings of actors Richard Roxburgh, Shuler Hensley, and Will Kemp (who portrayed the Wolf Man). Although it is somewhat screen-specific, the track is still plenty lively, with the three actors joking with each other throughout the feature, and covering a wide range of topics, such as:

--- How (in their view) computer effects were used to enhance both their performances and the film.

--- Discussions about the extensive makeup applications and wire-work sessions that some members of the cast had to endure.

--- The challenge of portraying iconic characters, like the Dracula, Frankenstein’s Monster, and the Wolf Man.


Explore Dracula’s Castle
Through this neat extra, viewers can embark on an interactive tour of Dracula’s forbidding castle, and take a much closer look at the wonderful set design than they were able to get in Van Helsing. Unfortunately, the tour is accompanied by some rather lame narration by Richard Roxburgh, who played the infamous Count in the film.


You Are In The Movie!
Through miniature cameras scattered throughout the set, this 4 ½-minute bonus feature offers a bird’s eye view of a few scenes being filmed, including Van Helsing sneaking into Dracula’s lab, and their subsequent meeting. More specifically, viewers will see these scenes from alternate angles, along with some text that describes what is taking place.

There is also an option to explore several of the movie’s sets while watching the feature. Press enter/select (depending on your remote) when the icon pops up during the film, and you are on your way. Personally, I never cared for extras that disrupt the flow of the movie like this, but to each their own…


Outtakes
The outtakes reel for Van Helsing is approximately 5 ½ minutes long, and features the usual – on-set hijinks, actors messing up their lines, and so forth. There is nothing groundbreaking here, but it is a bit more amusing than typical offerings.


Bringing the Monsters to Life
One of the more interesting extras, the 10-minute “Bringing the Monsters to Life” chronicles the process of re-creating some of history’s greatest monsters. Essentially, from conceptual art through digital composition, the good folks at Industrial Light and Magic show viewers how Van Helsing’s monsters were given life.


The Van Helsing Xbox game
The first level of the Van Helsing video game is available for play (provided that you have an Xbox console, of course).


Van Helsing: The Story, The Life, The Legend
Essentially, this value-added feature consists of a 10-minute documentary that outlines the Van Helsing character through interview clips, concept art, and a breakdown of Industrial Light and Magic’s computer-generated effects.

As the segment opens, Van Helsing’s origins are outlined, via interview excerpts and footage from Universal’s classic monster films. Afterwards, Stephen Sommers reveals why he decided to focus on the early part of Van Helsing’s career. Finally, Mr. Sommers, and actors David Wenham and Kate Beckinsale offer plenty of complimentary comments about man who played the legendary vampire killer, Hugh Jackman.


Trailers
A nearly 2 1/2 –minute promotional trailer for Van Helsing, is included, as is the “Superbowl Trailer”. This latter trailer, which runs 60 seconds, seems like a condensed version of the 2 ½ minute trailer, as it features much of the same footage.


DVD Credits
If you have the inclination, you can see a list of the people responsible for bringing the abomination that is Van Helsing to DVD.


Promotional Materials
The disc kicks off with promotional material for:
--- Shaun of the Dead, Seed of Chucky, and The Mummy, The Mummy Returns, and The Scorpion King.



SCORE CARD

(on a five-point scale)
Film: Posted Image Posted Image
Video: Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image
Audio: Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image
Extras: Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image
Overall: Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image



THE LAST WORD
As you can clearly see, despite going into it knowing it would be a “popcorn flick”, I thought Van Helsing was an extremely disappointing film! Maybe I was being overly optimistic, but I simply expected much more from Stephen Sommers, especially with an actor of Hugh Jackman’s caliber on board.

On the other hand, in terms of A/V quality, the DVD is fantastic! Love it or hate it, Van Helsing does deliver in those departments, as the transfer is first-rate and the soundtrack truly immerses the viewer in the on-screen action. With a couple exceptions, the extras also provide some insight into the creation of this film and Stephen Sommers’ writing process. Thus, if you liked the movie in the theaters, you will almost certainly find it worth your money.

Unfortunately, for me, this is yet another case of a great DVD being released for a really bad movie, and I would only recommend it to those who have already seen the movie and disagree with my assessment of its quality. For all of the reasons I mentioned at the beginning of this review, I think what could have been a really fun movie ends up being little more than a test of one’s endurance. I can only hope someone stakes Van Helsing through the heart, before Mr. Sommers brings him back to desecrate the memories of more of the classic monsters that horror fans hold dear!


Stay tuned…
Padawan Learner in the Mystical Art of Home Theater!

Display Tweaked to Perfection by Calibrator Extraordinaire Gregg Loewen!

#2 of 147 David Galindo

David Galindo

    Screenwriter

  • 1,264 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 30 2003

Posted October 13 2004 - 01:58 AM

I hate Universal's choices of which movie gets DTS tracks. This would be an instant buy if it had one.

I love Alan Silvestri’s score, and its nice you mentioned it- it really made the movie! Great review!

#3 of 147 Stephen_J_H

Stephen_J_H

    Producer

  • 3,954 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 30 2003
  • Real Name:Stephen J. Hill
  • LocationNorth of the 49th

Posted October 13 2004 - 02:28 AM

I thought this was a lot of fun. No, it's not as good as The Mummy, but remember how much that one got slagged by critics when it first came out; the same critics were singing its praises in comparison to VH, which tells me that their memories are failing them in some sense.
"My opinion is that (a) anyone who actually works in a video store and does not understand letterboxing has given up on life, and (b) any customer who prefers to have the sides of a movie hacked off should not be licensed to operate a video player."-- Roger Ebert

#4 of 147 ThomasC

ThomasC

    Lead Actor

  • 6,526 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 15 2001

Posted October 13 2004 - 02:40 AM

Jason, I wholeheartedly agree with your review of the movie, and somewhat on your takes of Sommers' Mummy films. I actually enjoyed The Mummy Returns much more than The Mummy, but The Mummy is still a decent movie, and much better than Van Helsing. If a sequel is made, I will hold out hope that it will be much better written than its predecessor. Even so, I still might watch this again and see if I can enjoy it, seeing as I know what to expect this time around. Watching a movie for the second time has changed my opinion of several films, and I hope it will be the case here. Thanks for the review!

#5 of 147 DustinPizarro

DustinPizarro

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 93 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 23 2004

Posted October 13 2004 - 03:04 AM

Great review Jason! You pretty much summed up my feelings on the movie. I had such high hopes for this one especially during the opening scene at Frakenstein's castle but by the end of the movie I was so disappointed. It just got worse and worse as the movie rolled on. I've waited so long to see these classic Universal monsters revamped but they were just completely mishandled. I hope the filmmakers are not seriously thinking of a sequel. Needles to say, I'm skipping this one but I might rent it just to give my system a sonic workout.

#6 of 147 Steve Christou

Steve Christou

    Executive Producer

  • 14,268 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 25 2000
  • Real Name:Steve Christou
  • LocationLondon, England

Posted October 13 2004 - 03:42 AM

I enjoyed the film for what it was, a deliriously silly summer blockbuster. Over here we have the choice of a 1 or 2-disc version, I bought the 2-disc on monday, plenty of extras to peruse, but it seems like they're delaying the 2-disc R1 for next year, looks like Universal wants the R1 fans to buy it twice, not very nice is it?

Dave hören... auf, wille stoppen sie Dave... stoppen sie Dave... Mein gehirn geht... Ich bin gefühl es... Ich bin gefühl es... Ich bin ängstlich Dave... Guter Nachmittag. Ich bin ein HAL 9000 computer. Ich wurde funktionsfähig am HAL-Betrieb in Urbana, Illinois auf January 12 1992.


Lord of the Hubs


#7 of 147 Joe Caps

Joe Caps

    Screenwriter

  • 1,931 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 10 2000

Posted October 13 2004 - 04:10 AM

I was really looking forward to this film in the theater. I am a big Hugh Jackman fan. the film started good, but the leads have the same problems over and over with the same solutions that went on forever and eventually for very boring. Too bad. I heard if this film did well there would be a Van Helsing 2 and 3. I hope this doesn't happen. I'd like to see Hugh Jackman do better things where he can really act.

#8 of 147 Keith M.

Keith M.

    Second Unit

  • 489 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 01 1999

Posted October 13 2004 - 04:17 AM

Could someone enlighten me on the different versions that will be available next Tuesday...

Thanks in advance...

#9 of 147 John_McKittrick

John_McKittrick

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 226 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 09 1999

Posted October 13 2004 - 05:53 AM

I'll just get the one disk.
Long Live XBox and DVD!!

#10 of 147 Malcolm R

Malcolm R

    Executive Producer

  • 11,536 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 2002
  • LocationVermont

Posted October 13 2004 - 06:03 AM

Could someone enlighten me on the different versions that will be available next Tuesday...
I believe in the US (R1), we get:

- Single disc version (WS or FS), with the film and a couple extras, but basically bare-bones.

- Three-disc collectors version with both WS and FS versions of the film, lots of extras (probably similar to or same as the R2 disc 2), and a third disc with the classic "Dracula," "Frankenstein," and "Wolf Man" films from the 1930's.

Anyone who bought the Legacy editions of the Classic Monster films earlier this year, and wants the "Van Helsing" bonus features, really gets shafted because they have to pay a premium to get the second disc but already have all the films on the third disc ($15 coaster anyone?).

So you can have bare bones, or pay for a lot of extra stuff you probably already have. No happy medium unless you import from R2. Typical Universal nonsense! Posted Image
The purpose of an education is to replace an empty mind with an open mind.

#11 of 147 Chad Ferguson

Chad Ferguson

    Supporting Actor

  • 926 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 31 2000

Posted October 13 2004 - 06:12 AM

How can you attack Universal for putting DTS on Meet the Parents? DTS is not action movies only. Anything that improves sound for any movie is worth it, if it by chance made Meet the Parents a little more engrossing then by all means. Really, why is DTS considered for action movies only?

#12 of 147 Ernest Rister

Ernest Rister

    Producer

  • 4,148 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 26 2001

Posted October 13 2004 - 06:16 AM

"The biggest problem is that Sommers appears to be following in the footsteps of George Lucas, whose recent films are all about style over substance."

The Mummy begs, borrows, and steals from Lucas' Raiders of the Lost Ark...if I were to compare Van Helsing to another movie, it would be Hook...i.e., a giddy, jokey, yet bloated and unconvincing production of a fun idea.

#13 of 147 Bryan Tuck

Bryan Tuck

    Screenwriter

  • 1,498 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 16 2002

Posted October 13 2004 - 06:19 AM

Quote:
- Three-disc collectors version with both WS and FS versions of the film, lots of extras (probably similar to or same as the R2 disc 2), and a third disc with the classic "Dracula," "Frankenstein," and "Wolf Man" films from the 1930's.

Think they'll finally get the audio right on Dracula?
"Flying a plane is no different from riding a bicycle; it's just a lot harder to put baseball cards in the spokes."

#14 of 147 Jason Smalley

Jason Smalley

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 59 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 24 2000

Posted October 13 2004 - 07:05 AM

Quote:
How can you attack Universal for putting DTS on Meet the Parents? DTS is not action movies only. Anything that improves sound for any movie is worth it, if it by chance made Meet the Parents a little more engrossing then by all means. Really, why is DTS considered for action movies only?


I don't believe it was a case of "Van Helsing" instead of "Meet the Parents." It seemed to me that it was in addition to.

Especially since Universal has taken the rather unfriendly approach of ensuring a double-dip later on with a second disc of extras and the quasi-obligitory DTS track for the reissue.

Just my thoughts.

#15 of 147 Aaron Silverman

Aaron Silverman

    Lead Actor

  • 9,467 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 22 1999
  • Real Name:Aaron Silverman
  • LocationFlorida

Posted October 13 2004 - 08:33 AM

Well, maybe it was my low expectations, but I quite enjoyed this one. Sure, it was silly, but it was fun!
"How wonderful it will be to have a leader unburdened by the twin horrors of knowledge and experience." -- Mr. Wick

#16 of 147 Matt Goddard

Matt Goddard

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 174 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 21 1999

Posted October 13 2004 - 10:05 AM

Quote:
and a third disc with the classic "Dracula," "Frankenstein," and "Wolf Man" films from the 1930's.


I've been trying to figure this out since Van Helsing was announced on DVD. Doesn't the inclusion of the three classic films make the Ultimate Edition a no-brainer, assuming you're interested in the feature presentation? Although it may be sans extras, that third disc seems to be a bargain for $40 or whatever the Ultimate Edition winds up being.

Incidentally, I agree that Van Helsing was very disappointing. However, my review to others was that while the movie sucked, I was sure it would make an awesome DVD. It's interesting how this addiction shapes our movie reviews.

#17 of 147 Jim Barg

Jim Barg

    Second Unit

  • 395 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 07 2004

Posted October 13 2004 - 10:50 AM

After seeing the film last May, I thought it was a waste of a bulletproof idea. That said, there's still a part of me that wants a sequel, if only to see the filmmakers try to get it right. Do they deserve it? No. But odds are since the film did well overseas and probably will sell well on DVD, Van Helsing 2 will probably get made anyway.

As for the DVDs, I might look into the 3-disc since I don't own any of the Legacy sets. We'll see...

#18 of 147 Malcolm R

Malcolm R

    Executive Producer

  • 11,536 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 2002
  • LocationVermont

Posted October 13 2004 - 11:09 AM

Doesn't the inclusion of the three classic films make the Ultimate Edition a no-brainer, assuming you're interested in the feature presentation?

When you've already paid $60 or more for the Legends collections that came out last spring, it's just superfluous padding that's driving up the cost of what should be a reasonably priced 2-disc set of "Van Helsing."
The purpose of an education is to replace an empty mind with an open mind.

#19 of 147 AaronMK

AaronMK

    Supporting Actor

  • 768 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 30 1999
  • Real Name:Aaron Karp
  • LocationOrlando, FL

Posted October 13 2004 - 12:09 PM

Quick Question:

Has Universal finally at the very least made the trailers that appear when you put the disc in skippable?

If so, I might consider a rent, but otherwise, I don't know why I should put up with crap like forced trailers for a movie that people have said is only so-so.

#20 of 147 Mark Oates

Mark Oates

    Supporting Actor

  • 874 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 12 2004

Posted October 13 2004 - 12:17 PM

Something pretty frickin' bizarre going on at the moment. According to Universal's PR company, the three-disc Ultimate Collector's Edition has been pulled, but I know at least one online retailer who reckons they have the UCE in stock and ready to ship. Posted Image
J Mark Oates
Do Not Be Afraid. That sound is simply my mind boggling.