Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


The Sting SE on 09/06/05 See Post #133

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
158 replies to this topic

#1 of 159 OFFLINE   Mikel_Cooperman



  • 4,184 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 16 2001

Posted March 07 2004 - 12:37 PM

Recently I saw a magazine ad for this movie on DVD in Entertainment Weekly but upon researching it, found out that it is only available in Fullscreen. Are there any plans to rerelease this in a Special Edition and Widescreen?

#2 of 159 OFFLINE   chris_clem


    Second Unit

  • 345 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 09 2003

Posted March 07 2004 - 02:20 PM

You meant to say only available in Fullscreen right? If I'm not mistaken, 1:1.33 (or fullscreen) is the correct aspect ratio for this film. Widescreen would not be OAR.

#3 of 159 OFFLINE   Thomas Newton

Thomas Newton


  • 1,460 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 16 1999

Posted March 07 2004 - 03:24 PM

That's interesting. Was it made for TV? (I was under the impression that all "modern" theatrical films were widescreen.)

#4 of 159 OFFLINE   Brandon Conway

Brandon Conway


  • 7,625 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 30 2002
  • Real Name:Brandon Conway
  • LocationNorth Hollywood, CA

Posted March 07 2004 - 03:28 PM

The Sting has an OAR of 1.85:1. The current DVD is open matte.

"And now the reprimand, from an American critic. He reproaches me for using film as a sacred & lasting medium, like a painting or a book. He does not believe that filmmaking is an inferior art, but he believes, and quite rightly, that a reel goes quickly, that the public are looking above all for relaxation, that film is fragile and that it is pretentious to express the power of one's soul by such ephemeral and delicate means, that Charlie Chaplin's or Buster Keaton's first films can only be seen on very rare and badly spoiled prints. I add that the cinema is making daily progress and that eventually films that we consider marvelous today will soon be forgotten because of new dimensions & colour. This is true. But for 4 weeks this film [The Blood of a Poet] has been shown to audiences that have been so attentive, so eager & so warm, that I wonder after all there is not an anonymous public who are looking for more than relaxation in the cinema." - Jean Cocteau, 1932

#5 of 159 OFFLINE   Matt Czyz

Matt Czyz

    Supporting Actor

  • 902 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 05 2003

Posted March 07 2004 - 03:35 PM

The Sting was definitely not made for TV. The IMDb, though often incorrect on such matters, lists it as a 1.85:1 aspectratio.

#6 of 159 OFFLINE   BryanV


    Stunt Coordinator

  • 135 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 16 2004

Posted March 07 2004 - 05:57 PM

I noticed this as I almost bought the Oscar Winning edition at Cost-Co before I noticed one of the SF's listed was a "Full Frame Presontation". This is shamefull, shamefull. Posted Image

#7 of 159 OFFLINE   GlennH



  • 2,128 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 28 1998
  • Real Name:Glenn

Posted March 08 2004 - 02:25 AM

Too bad this is by Universal. If Warner owned the rights we would probably have a nice 2-disc SE in OAR by now.

#8 of 159 OFFLINE   Gabe D

Gabe D


  • 2,173 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2001

Posted March 08 2004 - 02:44 AM

The bizarre thing is that they released a letterboxed VHS tape around the same time as the DVD.

#9 of 159 OFFLINE   Gordon McMurphy

Gordon McMurphy


  • 3,530 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 03 2002

Posted March 08 2004 - 02:57 AM

Universal is still in a coma when it comes to creating Special Editions of brilliant catalogue films in their vault. I know they have their problems, but surely releasing high-quality SEs of films like The Sting would help the company? It would be a BIG seller.

#10 of 159 OFFLINE   chris_clem


    Second Unit

  • 345 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 09 2003

Posted March 08 2004 - 03:08 AM

Oops! my bad:b My R3 version is Fullscreen as well and since OAR is usually the default here, I thought this was the OAR for this film as well! (R3 releases here in the Philippines are *almost always* OAR...this apparently being one of the few exceptions) ...I just checked and apparently it's widescreen in R2.

#11 of 159 OFFLINE   Dane Marvin

Dane Marvin


  • 1,490 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 21 2003

Posted March 08 2004 - 03:56 AM

Stupid, stupid Universal. It's a shame I can't buy this because it's one of the most cleverly-written films I've ever seen. Magnificent screenplay.

#12 of 159 OFFLINE   BarryRR



  • 37 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 25 2004

Posted March 08 2004 - 04:05 AM

They already missed the 30th anniversary. I've been hoping for a decent SE of this for eons. It's a no-brainer. A classic, a Best Picture winner--what gives???? Instead they're pushing CAT IN THE HAT! Posted Image

#13 of 159 OFFLINE   Eric Peterson

Eric Peterson


  • 2,959 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 02 2001

Posted March 08 2004 - 05:17 AM

I doubt we'll be seeing a new edition of this anytime in the immediate future. This is Universal, the most inept DVD studio out there.

#14 of 159 OFFLINE   Jeff Adkins

Jeff Adkins


  • 1,765 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 18 1998
  • Real Name:Jeff Adkins

Posted March 08 2004 - 05:42 AM

I have the R2 UK release. It was dirt cheap and is in 1.85 widescreen. It is not anamorphic though.

#15 of 159 OFFLINE   streeter



  • 1,391 posts
  • Join Date: May 24 2001

Posted March 08 2004 - 06:12 AM

Since it's Universal, maybe we can expect another FRANCHISE collection re-release together with The Sting II.
Nothing Lost Forever: The Films of Tom Schiller
"I'll tell you why... 'cause I'm a dancer."

home page / dvds

#16 of 159 OFFLINE   Mark Bendiksen

Mark Bendiksen


  • 1,090 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 16 1999

Posted March 08 2004 - 06:26 AM

That'd be great! As long as we're not forced to buy both of them together. Posted Image

#17 of 159 OFFLINE   Mikel_Cooperman



  • 4,184 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 16 2001

Posted March 08 2004 - 06:31 AM

Yeah I meant it was only available in Full screen. I guess all we can do is write Universal DVD which I found by doing a search on the Internet, and writing them.

#18 of 159 OFFLINE   Chad A Wright

Chad A Wright

    Supporting Actor

  • 740 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 22 2002

Posted March 08 2004 - 07:14 AM

I finally broke down and watched my Mom's copy of the DVD the other day and absolutely loved the movie. I'd never seen it before this. I hate experiencing a film for the first time in non-OAR, but I had heard so manny good things about this one. I will wait for OAR, but it will be hard.

#19 of 159 OFFLINE   Thomas Newton

Thomas Newton


  • 1,460 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 16 1999

Posted March 08 2004 - 12:45 PM

Open Matte, or Pan-and-Scan? If it's Open Matte, you could theoretically watch it in OAR by taping mattes over your TV screen (not that you should be forced to go to such trouble). If it's Pan-and-Scan, there's actually material chopped off and no workaround is possible.

#20 of 159 OFFLINE   Alan Kurland

Alan Kurland

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 99 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 06 1998

Posted March 08 2004 - 04:38 PM

Because the movie is so great, and one of my favorites, it is one of the only, if not the only, movie I own in full screen. I would gladly trash it any day if a widescreen version came out! Extras would be great too.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users