1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

*** Official KINGDOM OF HEAVEN Discussion Thread

Discussion in 'Movies' started by Allen Hirsch, May 1, 2005.

  1. Allen Hirsch

    Allen Hirsch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 1999
    Messages:
    532
    Likes Received:
    0
    The current theater trailer makes it look like Gladiator II (which wouldn't be the worst thing, except it's already been done).

    If this one doesn't do big box office, following Troy and Alexander as box office bombs, I'd think that would shut down the Hollywood coffers for "swords and sandals" epics for quite awhile.

    I may see it, thanks to Norton, Neeson, and Ridley Scott's participation. I wouldn't see it based on the leads of Bloom and Green, or the subject matter (Netflix rental, like Alexander and Troy were).
     
  2. Justin Bauer

    Justin Bauer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    553
    Likes Received:
    0
    When I first saw the trailer I thought it was just to much like Gladiator. But now, I think it is alright to look like Gladiator because that is a good thing. The subject is much different and I cannot wait until Friday to see it. I am not thrilled about Bloom in the lead, but I will still see it anyway. I love Scott's movies and still wish it was him at the helm of Alexander.
     
  3. derek

    derek Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 1998
    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hollywood on Crusade
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...042900744.html

    Excellent article. While it seems like Ridley Scott has hit capturing the period's look on film, looks like he misses the boat with quite a bit of 'revisionist history.' Many are critizing the liberties he takes. Scott's post-modern look at religion clearly betrays the accuracy of medieval faith. One quote really sums it up where he says Is this a joke? If I'm going to see a period film (a few recent good ones come to mind The Passion and Master and Commander) I want to see (and expect) historical accuracy and when liberty is taken it is understood and reasoned. I may not know the depths of the particular event but please Mr. Scott don't play your audiences dumb to history and blind to motive.
     
  4. ThomasC

    ThomasC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2001
    Messages:
    6,526
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think most people care if it's accurate or not, as long as it's entertaining. You're part of the exception.
     
  5. Cameron Yee

    Cameron Yee Well-Known Member
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    11,287
    Likes Received:
    502
    Location:
    Since 2006
    Real Name:
    Cameron Yee
    This brings up an interesting issue, as I'm sure the majority of audiences would object to any revision of history from more recent times. So when do audiences START caring? 100 years ago, 50 years ago? Does it only matter if there are people still alive to remember it as it was and can protest it?
     
  6. Andy Sheets

    Andy Sheets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2000
    Messages:
    2,371
    Likes Received:
    1
    We'll just have to see when the movie comes out but it sounds like business as usual in historical filmmaking *shrug* I can't say I found the article very good.
     
  7. TheLongshot

    TheLongshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2000
    Messages:
    4,119
    Likes Received:
    0


    Some people do (like my wife), but most don't. See Braveheart. I still have friends who won't see it again because of the liberties they took with history.

    Course, there are always people out there who know their stuff who can't enjoy a film because of the "obvious" mistakes.

    I think they need to worry more about getting butts in the seats.

    Jason
     
  8. Bryan Ri

    Bryan Ri Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2004
    Messages:
    1,688
    Likes Received:
    32
    Location:
    NYC Area
    Real Name:
    Bryan
    I just wrote my senior thesis paper on this topic (I'm a History Major, being certified to teach it). There are a great deal of famous Historians (famous in my field at least) that have contributed to the thought process on where Hollywood's place in History lay.

    My research shows that the general concensus of Historians feel that the best way to stimulate interest in various parts of history is through moving images. There are a great deal of collaborative books that dispell innaccuracies in historically based books, but still applaud (in some cases) the efforts given by filmmakers.

    Speaking as a young Historian myself, contradictions in films are ok as filmmakers should be allowed some dramatic licence to their work.
     
  9. JonZ

    JonZ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 1998
    Messages:
    7,794
    Likes Received:
    7
  10. Michael Martin

    Michael Martin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2000
    Messages:
    1,129
    Likes Received:
    0
    From James B's review, it sounds like the extended DVD version will ammend the theatrical cut's problems (plots shortened or dropped, less characterization, etc.).
     
  11. RobLe

    RobLe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2005
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    0
    I read somewhere that Ridley Scott originally wanted Russell Crowe as the main character. If it were Crowe, atleast I wouldn't have the doubts I have about Orlando Bloom carrying a movie. But the movie already seems alot like Gladiator and having Crowe would just make it even more similar.
     
  12. Colton

    Colton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2004
    Messages:
    795
    Likes Received:
    1
    I just got my Advance Screening tickets for a showing tonight. I'll let you know ...

    - Colton
     
  13. Richard_D_Ramirez

    Richard_D_Ramirez Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2001
    Messages:
    439
    Likes Received:
    0
    I hope the film is much better than the trailer. The trailer certainly makes the film look like a "Legolas who wants to be Aragorn" flick. Please let the film be better!

    8^B
     
  14. Holadem

    Holadem Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2000
    Messages:
    8,972
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ugh. Not again. Main reason I hated Gladiator at first sight (it's grown on me since mostly because of Joaquin Phoenix and mostly, the music). The action was so fast it simply failed to register.

    --
    H
     
  15. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    28,159
    Likes Received:
    3,867
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    This thread is now designated the Official Discussion Thread for "Kingdom of Heaven" please, post all comments, links to outside reviews, film and box office discussion items to this thread.

    All HTF member film reviews of "Kingdom of Heaven" should be posted to the Official Review Thread.

    Thank you for your consideration in this matter.


    Crawdaddy
     
  16. AlexCremers

    AlexCremers Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2004
    Messages:
    432
    Likes Received:
    0
    quote:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Alien and Blade Runner were groundbreaking for their time, but when viewing them today, they would be considered dated by many in there use of dark shadows, smoke and haze to conceal limitations in production design or visual effects.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



    I must disagree, just like a good song, those "visual classics" never get dated. Like all good classics do, they have a way of standing out. I think they still function as an example simply because they have not yet been equaled (photography and set design-wise). I believe the elements in Blade Runner (like smoke) added to the atmosphere. They were not there just to mask poor effects. Ridley Scott also used them in non-effects films like 'Someone To Watch Over Me' and 'Black Rain', but those weren't as controlled as his two masterpieces. And if you look at certain 'Gladiator' scenes, like the haze in the scene where Phoenix poisons Crowe, you'll see that Ridley didn't abandon his "old" style altogether. Does that make 'Gladiator' dated already?
    Also, I don't see how filtering a sky pink adds to a grittier atmosphere. I simply find it distracting because, IMO, using filters is a easy solution to cover up uninteresting skies. From what I've seen so far, I honestly find nothing to rave about, which is in stark contrast with my reaction to just about any scene from taken from 'Alien' or 'Blade Runner'. While these films still make my jaw drop, 'Kingdom Of Heaven' looks a little more a bit more common, a little more bland, less innovative and more fomulaic, less Ridley Scott and more Tony Scott. I don't think much will be written about this either, technically or emotionally. In fact, I wonder if people will talk about 'Kingdom of Heaven' the way they still do about 'Alien' or 'Blade Runner'.


    Alex
     
  17. DanR

    DanR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 1998
    Messages:
    676
    Likes Received:
    0
    Saw this last night...did anyone else notice during the "Rise a Knight" scene (the 2nd such scene, not the one with Liam) that they used the music from "The 13th Warrior"? I couldn't beleive it. It totally took me out of the scene and a I was looking for Antonio Banderas and thinking a bunch of Wendols were going to be attacking (instead of Saracens). Just plain weird.

    Overall, good movie but lacking in some parts. I will definitely wait for the Extended DVD.

    Regards,
    Dan
     
  18. Lee Scoggins

    Lee Scoggins Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2001
    Messages:
    6,396
    Likes Received:
    0
    Real Name:
    Lee
    I give it a "C-":

    The good: Liam Neeson, Jeremy Irons, Sets are amazing, Battle scenes are innovative and enthralling, Academy Award quality cinematography.

    The bad: fugly leading lady, dreadful acting by Orlando Bloom

    The ugly: horrific storyline, perhaps due to a reputed 1 hour cut of materials by idiot studio heads.

    I wish I could be more positive as a long-time Ridley Scott fan but I strongly suggest waiting for the Director's Cut DVD on this one.

    [​IMG]
     
  19. Lee Scoggins

    Lee Scoggins Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2001
    Messages:
    6,396
    Likes Received:
    0
    Real Name:
    Lee
    Let's call it "Stink'em to Heaven" [​IMG]
     
  20. Kain_C

    Kain_C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2002
    Messages:
    1,036
    Likes Received:
    0


    If you are referring to Eva Green, that's enough right there to invalidate your review for me.
     

Share This Page