That's what I think. Another possibility is the streaming device people are using does not stream in 1080p. My Panasonic player streams Netflix in 1080p to my 106" screen, and it looks excellent. If I'm lucky, that's fine with me.I must just be lucky, I'm sitting here with 3 meg service streaming fine, not HDX fine but it looks real similar to most stuff on directv HD. Maybe if you live in a heavily populated area that's what's killing it?
That is some good news. The throttling of Netflix streams has been killing me lately.Sam Posten said:Netflix surrenders to Comcast:http://recode.net/2014/02/23/netflix-and-comcast-solve-their-web-traffic-problem-with-a-long-term-deal/
Yes but watch for raised prices $$$ coming soon to a consumer near you. I would be interest in seeing what will happen when prices rise. Will people jump ship like they did in droves a few years ago?Mark-P said:That is some good news. The throttling of Netflix streams has been killing me lately.
But no, this is way incorrect. http://blog.streamingmedia.com/2014/02/media-botching-coverage-netflix-comcast-deal-getting-basics-wrong.htmlTowergrove said:Yes but watch for raised prices $$$ coming soon to a consumer near you. I would be interest in seeing what will happen when prices rise. Will people jump ship like they did in droves a few years ago?
Naturally, many of these same people are also implying that because Netflix has to pay Comcast, consumers will foot the bill for this as Netflix will have to charge more for their service. This could not be further from the truth. Those stating this have no clue how Netflix delivers their content today or what costs they already incur. If they did, they would know this is not a new cost to Netflix, it’s simply paying a different provider, and it should be at a lower cost. It should actually be cheaper for Netflix to buy direct from Comcast, and they also get an SLA, which also improves quality and that’s a good thing. Given that Netflix has many options to buy transit from many different transit providers, why would they pay more? They wouldn’t.
Even worse, some want to imply that today’s announcement has to do with Net Neutrality and Tech Crunch went as far to say that the deal “may be legally outside of the traditional net neutrality rules.” May be? Are they serious? Commercial interconnect relationships, also referred to as paid peering agreements, have been around since the Internet started, and it’s how the Internet works. Commercial interconnect deals have NOTHING TO DO WITH NET NEUTRALITY. Implying otherwise shows a complete lack of regard in understanding how traffic is and has been exchanged across networks for the past twenty years.
Sugar coating is sweet but In "economy 2014" the consumer ALWAYS pays in the end.I know the way I phrased it might make it seem like I agree with this: But no, this is way incorrect. http://blog.streamingmedia.com/2014/02/media-botching-coverage-netflix-comcast-deal-getting-basics-wrong.html
And:http://www.cnbc.com/id/101439383Dan Rayburn @DanRayburn 22mVerizon CEO says on a call this morning that he expects Verizon to announce a deal with Netflix shortly.Collapse