Oliver_A
Stunt Coordinator
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2006
- Messages
- 126
- Real Name
- Oliver Achten
Hello,
every time I am watching Vertigo on DVD, I am always wondering if the mastering of the DVD accurately represents what had been achieved during the restoration of this masterpiece. There are 2 parts which make me suspicious:
1. The 1996 Universal logo looks horrible. Unsharp & heavily filtered.
2. The "Restoration Credits" at the end of the movie are exactly as lacking in sharpness as most of the rest of the movie.
Please don't get me wrong, I don't want to criticize the meticulous efforts which had been made to present this movie in its original glory. However, I always had the feeling that the DVD was made with much less care, that Vertigo could look much better if mastered correctly.
An interesting sidenote, perhaps Robert could comment on this, would today's digital technology provide any improvements over photochemical restorations like the one applied to Vertigo?
Thank you!
every time I am watching Vertigo on DVD, I am always wondering if the mastering of the DVD accurately represents what had been achieved during the restoration of this masterpiece. There are 2 parts which make me suspicious:
1. The 1996 Universal logo looks horrible. Unsharp & heavily filtered.
2. The "Restoration Credits" at the end of the movie are exactly as lacking in sharpness as most of the rest of the movie.
Please don't get me wrong, I don't want to criticize the meticulous efforts which had been made to present this movie in its original glory. However, I always had the feeling that the DVD was made with much less care, that Vertigo could look much better if mastered correctly.
An interesting sidenote, perhaps Robert could comment on this, would today's digital technology provide any improvements over photochemical restorations like the one applied to Vertigo?
Thank you!