All i can say is that i would take the word of bigshot aka Stephen Worth as he is what i would call an animation expert, his post earlier in the thread and indeed in other threads say that Disney are putting out their animated classics with alterations including colours, this is due to how they "restore" them, i haven't been that happy with Disney animated releases, they get high praise but something isn't right with them, it's not just that they lack any film texture, the colours and tone seem off on a lot of their releases, the Diamond editions get treated better than the "second tier" titles, i was appalled by The Aristocats release.JoshZ said:I'm the first person to complain about the teal & orange fad in movies made today, and the revisionist timing of some live action features to make them look more "modern," but when it comes to the alleged recoloring of Disney animation, I have to wonder against what reference they're being compared? An old DVD or VHS? Memories of a theatrical screening from 60 to 70 years ago?
I used to think Disney just overdid the DNR but Stephen knows his stuff and has enlightened me in this very thread, i still wonder though if the second tier titles like The Aristocats have just been given the cheaper DNR option, still this thread is about Mary Poppins which is mostly live action, although i am fascinated to read posts from experts on this subject matter.