Max Leung
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2000
- Messages
- 4,611
Hmm, well, actually, the article didn't state that the researchers who declined releasing their data didn't say it was because of money. Rather:
Of the geneticists who said they intentionally withheld data regarding their published work, 80 percent reported it required too much effort to produce the requested information, 64 percent said they were protecting the ability of a student or junior faculty member to publish and 53 percent said they were protecting their own right to publish further findings.
So, if you take their responses at face value, they did it for the "fame and glory" or because they were lazy-ass bastards. Oh, and to cover their asses...better that a colleague down the hall get the credit, rather than some complete stranger.
The article implied it was because of corporate interests, but, I admit, the data does not support the article's claim directly.
Under closer scrutiny, the article's conclusion is largely insupportable. But it is still plausible.
Sorry about that. :b