Lord Dalek
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2005
- Messages
- 7,107
- Real Name
- Joel Henderson
Funny how Super Bowl IV (which wasn't lost persay but the color copy only recently turned up) showed up publicly before The 1967 World Championship Game.
I was there as well. While historically significant, it wasn't a close or interesting game, as most of the early Super Bowls weren't. It's funny how when it didn't exist it was worth a million dollars and when it did exist, the value dropped by $970,000. I don't blame the owners of the tape for telling the league they could stick it. If that were me, I'd dump it in the east river with the Dumont library before I'd sell it to the NFL for that price.The Super Bowl I telecast though is far more significant and far more historically valuable and given how the NFL used to say before the tape was discovered that a copy would be worth a million dollars, they should have been big enough to put their money where their mouths were on that with the people who had kept it preserved all this time. That they didn't and then put out an insulting "rebroadcast" of their own a few years ago using nothing but the same old-NFL Films material synched to the radio broadcast (which has been around for decades) was the ultimate proof of how much they don't give a damn about the significance of the broadcast.
By contrast, when Game 7 of the 1960 WS surfaced in Bing Crosby's cellar, MLB cut a deal in practically record time to get it aired on MLB Network and then released on DVD.
The other sports don't have nearly the history with their films that the NFL does and they've always wanted their films being the sole source of any kind of looks back at any game. What's ironic is that they have their own network and a treasure trove of great shows that were produced by NFL Films that they could be airing. The weekly This Week in Pro Football one hour shows (cut to a half hour in 1976), NFL Game of the Weeks going back to the mid-60s (although they didn't really get good until 1968 with Sam Spence's music) plus team highlight films which were produced for every team going back to the 60s, maybe earlier. Who knows what they have from the Tel Ra produced AFL shows, pre-1968.Regardless of who coined the million dollar phrase, it is a fact that the NFL has always had a low regard for the telecast history of the game. I can remember how stubborn they were about not wanting to do ANY kind of replays that when Buffalo had that miracle playoff comeback against Houston in the early 90s, local fans were pleading for a rebroadcast but all the NFL would do is give them 'extra NFL Films highlights'. Then when all the other sports leagues were allowing replays of classic games on Classic Sports Network and ESPN Classic, guess who was the lone holdout? When they finally did make some telecasts available in DVD releases it was so obvious how they were dragged kicking and screaming into doing it just because everyone else was. I think they truly have a hang-up that NFL Films should be the sole source of documenting the history of the league which is why they will never regard the telecast of Super Bowl I as anything special. By contrast, when Game 7 of the 1960 WS surfaced in Bing Crosby's cellar, MLB cut a deal in practically record time to get it aired on MLB Network and then released on DVD.
Thanks, Jack! I had completely forgotten about that release. It's on its way to me.By contrast, when Game 7 of the 1960 WS surfaced in Bing Crosby's cellar, MLB cut a deal in practically record time to get it aired on MLB Network and then released on DVD.