Chris Atkins
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- May 9, 2002
- Messages
- 3,885
It is amazing how many folks are dogging a movie they do not even understand.To quote C-3PO...
"Hear we go again..."
It is amazing how many folks are dogging a movie they do not even understand.To quote C-3PO...
"Hear we go again..."
To quote Chuck Mayer when I made an unwelcoming comment in the AOTC thread last year:
"Please make us feel welcome here."
Not everyone who doesn't like the movie has a screw loose.
I am not so sure that my comments were as unwelcoming as they were honest. I am perpetually irritated by comments like....................:rolleyes
Nevermind, I don't feel like it.
Folks PLEASE get some imagination.:frowning:
By the way I am not a Matrix fanboy. Just a sci-fi/anime/manga/comic book afficionado. I guess themes like those found in the Matrix trilogy are easier for me to swallow.
To quote C-3PO...
"Hear we go again..."Chris A. Please quote my posts in their intended contexts. I am not sure if you have see the movie yet but if you have some of the conclusions floating around in here are laughable.
This is terrible.
Yeah, well, I felt that same way after watching AOTC...but then I just accepted that people have different tastes, that it's okay to take expectations into the theater, and that others opinions can't ultimately change my love for a movie if I really love it.Gotcha Chris. But when folks walk away with complete and total misunderstandings of material and then attempt to post that crap as fact it really burns me up.
I am not saying that Revolutions or Reloaded were the best movies ever. I just think folks need to get some imagination. Isn't that what the movies are for. Or is it more like some dumb chick I USED to date would say, "I don't go to the movies to think." I had to get rid of her quick.
and another thing, it almost seemed like in the first one these guys stood away from anything that wouldnt look good, except for neo falling off the building that looked terrible, for the most part they stayed awaom from things that might look unrealistic or gay in the first one and i thought..wow these guys know what looks cool, but then they got they got neo throwing agent smith into a bunch of smiths making a bowling ball hitting pins noise, they got the slow motion pole thing which was cool but the guys looked so fake if you looked at their face, and then they got the end of the revolutions, 90% of the time there were flying in the air looked terrible...specially smith floating, if something doesnt look good dont do it at all, im sure the people who made daredevil know what im talking about.................(that was a joke)Perfect case and point. Movies REQUIRE imagination. I would hate to see how the OT of Starwars unaltered would hold up if it were released theatrically now.
Have any of you seen that original footage lately. That REALLY required some imagination along with other movies that came even twenty years after A New Hope. It is no wonder Lucas is cleaning up every frame of that trilogy for its 2006 (hopefully) release. Folks would critically dog it otherwise.
man............................................... .......
Trinity's reaction when their ship broke through the muck and they got a glimpse of the sun and the clouds.The Trinity reaction shot was indeed priceless
One more thought...anyone else think the movie should have ended where M1 began? How sweet would it have been to show the Oracle at the Hotel from the beginning of M1, with the Architect exchanging dialogue with her from his seat in M2 (we would see the Oracle thru one of the screens)...biggest lost opportunity IMO...
Also would have been nice to follow through on the theory that Seraph is a former "The One' by having him do some cool Neo things like stop bullets, etc.
And if you saw this on IMAX your crazy, how can you watch this in Pan and Scan?On the contrary, it was not pan & scan, rather formated to fit a 2.35:1 movie onto a 4:3 screen so you saw the black bars at the top & bottom, but still got a screen twice as large as any other theatre.
im depressed and lonelyNo comment.
I liked it. I know many people won't.
I dislike that type of roundabout discussion, so that's about it for me.
On the contrary, it was not pan & scan, rather formated to fit a 2.35:1 movie onto a 4:3 screen so you saw the black bars at the top & bottom, but still got a screen twice as large as any other theatrei didn't look 2.35:1... more like 2:1 to me... does anybody have specs? also, just how much wider is an Imax screen to the standard jumbo screen?