Mike_L
Auditioning
- Joined
- Mar 21, 1999
- Messages
- 11
I have narrowed my purchase decision down to a 61" Sony 4:3 set with a 16:9 mode - either the KP61HS20 or KP61HS30.
The only marked difference between the two sets is the protective screen - the 30 has it and the 20 does not. I see the screen as both a plus and a minus. A plus because I have a toddler and a minus because I believe that RPTVs provide a better image without the screen (no glare and more film-like).
My toddler pays no attention to my current tube TV and never puts her hands on the screen. However, there is always that uncertainty with a three-year old.
The difference in price between the two sets is roughly $150, the 20 being the cheaper of the two.
As for my room layout, if it helps anyone to provide better input, the seating position will be 13 ft. from the screen. The set will be in a room with no natural light, so I am not worried about control of lighting.
So, let me know what you think. Am I really making a mistake by not getting the 30, buying myself some piece of mind, yet sacrificing some of the image quality? Or should I take my chances and go with the 20, save some money, enjoy the non-glare screen, and just keep my fingers crossed?
Thanks for any inputs, and please, don't try and talk me into a 16:9 set as I have researched this extensively. A 4:3 set with a 16:9 mode is better suited to my needs.
Mike
The only marked difference between the two sets is the protective screen - the 30 has it and the 20 does not. I see the screen as both a plus and a minus. A plus because I have a toddler and a minus because I believe that RPTVs provide a better image without the screen (no glare and more film-like).
My toddler pays no attention to my current tube TV and never puts her hands on the screen. However, there is always that uncertainty with a three-year old.
The difference in price between the two sets is roughly $150, the 20 being the cheaper of the two.
As for my room layout, if it helps anyone to provide better input, the seating position will be 13 ft. from the screen. The set will be in a room with no natural light, so I am not worried about control of lighting.
So, let me know what you think. Am I really making a mistake by not getting the 30, buying myself some piece of mind, yet sacrificing some of the image quality? Or should I take my chances and go with the 20, save some money, enjoy the non-glare screen, and just keep my fingers crossed?
Thanks for any inputs, and please, don't try and talk me into a 16:9 set as I have researched this extensively. A 4:3 set with a 16:9 mode is better suited to my needs.
Mike