Hanson
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Nov 1, 1998
- Messages
- 5,272
- Real Name
- Hanson
The story/dialog/performance part of Boyhood is merely good -- it's nowhere near as engaging as, say, Before Midnight. If they had shot the movie in the course of a few months with different actors playing the kids and using make up, costume, and set design to note the passage of time, it would have been just okay. But the experience of watching the actor age 12 years and seeing time flow for real is mind blowing. It gives the movie a verisimilitude that has never been equaled in scripted cinema. I want to say that the movie is good but not great, but that's not true -- it's an amazing, epic achievement. And I can't even say it's for reasons outside of the movie, because everything in the movie is inextricably linked to the way it was shot.
In the end, Boyhood is more of a achievement in moviemaking than a movie. Sort of like Gadsby, the novel written without the letter E. But that book is just a novelty that's collecting dust now -- Boyhood deserves to be seen.
In the end, Boyhood is more of a achievement in moviemaking than a movie. Sort of like Gadsby, the novel written without the letter E. But that book is just a novelty that's collecting dust now -- Boyhood deserves to be seen.