Persianimmortal
Screenwriter
Patrick Donahue said:The way I look at all this physical/digital debate is - it's all a moot point if you ignore the 3 week early release window and purchase a Blu-Ray with a Digital HD code...
I don't really see this discussion as being a debate over physical vs. digital. For one thing such a debate is largely irrelevant because sales data shows that the average consumer is choosing digital. We can argue all we want about the benefits of physical disc, the market is clearly moving in another direction.
This discussion as I see it is more about the role of UHD Blu-ray, and what I'm saying is that it has no real role to play, no niche to fit into. For the average consumer who increasingly cares more about convenience over quality, digital fits the bill, whether for 2K now or 4K in the future. For the quality-conscious classic movie lover who values physical ownership, a vast catalog is already at hand in DVD or Blu-ray form. Along comes a brand new disc format (UHD Blu-ray) which offers format fatigued collectors: an incremental image quality improvement; very little likelihood of ever having a catalog of classic titles anywhere near that on BD or DVD; most likely a higher price than BD; and the need to buy new equipment. It doesn't really cater to either group of viewers.
Dave Moritz said:It sucks having these episodes stuck on the pc and I actually find it hard to sit down and watch any of those 3 episodes on my pc's 27" Samsung 1080p flat panel. I do not see how people enjoy watching content on a tiny smart phone.
You keep saying this, but it's only a dilemma because you're not exploring any options. Streaming media from a PC or phone/tablet to your main display is relatively straightforward if you do a little research.