Paul_Scott
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2002
- Messages
- 6,545
Since the nomination threads are intended to be used only for nominating titles and expressly discourage any other chatter, I thought it would be OK to start a thread expressly devoted to finding out why people made the choices they did and what things might have been worthy but just missed the cut. To start off, I just got around to watching the Criterion release of Sweet Smell Of Success the other night and now think I may have to go back and change my selections for best catalog release. The image on this disc was absolutely enthralling. I was afraid early on that it might be a victim of overzealous scrubbing, because it looks just too damn clean and glossy. But the longer it played and the closer I looked, there was nothing I could find to impeach it. The grain may be imperceptible for the most part, but the fine detail is still there. There's no DNR slurring in motion and the variety of textures look natural and precise. One of the most beautiful releases the format has seen so far. And it remains a sensational movie to boot. This is also one of the reasons I see MGM as being on a short list for studio of the year. Yes, it was Criterion that put it out, but MGM facilitated the release providing the elements and letting the film be licensed out in the first place. And apart from the West Side Story mis-step, MGM has consistently put out product that espouses the same values I seek when I buy catalog titles- that the film look natural and true to it's original identity and source. From Last Tango to The Big Country, Dressed To Kill to It's A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World- the breadth and scope of it's catalog releases this year were exemplary. I guess not many people are impressed with them because the releases usually lack a lot of bells and whistles as far as special features or usually aren't newly tarted up with a teal and orange sheen to make them look like 2011 movies. I dunno. What they lack in excitement, MGM makes up for in competence (WWS being the outlier). Also another reason I would make the case for MGM is what their new Bds represent over the original DVD releases. I wouldn't argue that the new Bds of Ben-Hur and Meet Me In St.Louis aren't wonderful and state of the art examples for the format, because I do believe they are. However the same was the case with the last iteration of their DVDs. Relatively speaking, the gulf between what we had prior and have now, doesn't seem as great. Contrast that with the only available releases of things like IAMMMMW or The Big Country or Some Like It Hot or a score of others. These were all wonderful, vast a/v upgrades and usually at a bargain price point. With some classic Hitchcock and some of the absolute best Woody Allen films on the horizon, it's seems like they are going full speed ahead. well, guess that's it for now. Just wanted the chance to elaborate on a couple choices. Overall it was a solid year for catalog releases without too many flubs. Hopefully 2012 will be even better.