"So to me, until people stop buying entry level junk and go back to buying stuff that lasts, you'll end up with stories like this post. I hear about them every day"
I agree with your conclusion, but not your analysis. If you think there is any sort of correlation between price and likelihood something will break you are sadly mistaken. Take (1) the auto industry (Mercedes and Volkswagen/Audi have pitiful reliability and worse customer service); (2) the video industry (high end brands fail more frequently than lower end brands); and (3) the audio industry (same)
High end audio gear tends to fail more frequently precisely because it is not mass produced. Additionally, it tends to be a lot more complex than lower end equipment and thus there are simply more things that can and eventually will go wrong. And that, I think, is the real correlation.
Until recently I had always driven hand-me-down cars, from a time when cars were largely mechanical devices. Now I drive a car with all the latest gadgets. And, of course, it is in the shop with alarming regularity.
So, bottom line, definitely go for quality, but don't measure that concept by how much lighter it makes your wallet. Plasmas are a new technology and lcd's are a new application of an older technology. Both are more complex than crt's and for those reasons are going to have more problems.
The displays mentioned in this thread are examples of worse than average implementation. They happen to be inexpensive. But I'd be very surprised if there weren't just as many problems with certain "expensive" sets.
I agree with your conclusion, but not your analysis. If you think there is any sort of correlation between price and likelihood something will break you are sadly mistaken. Take (1) the auto industry (Mercedes and Volkswagen/Audi have pitiful reliability and worse customer service); (2) the video industry (high end brands fail more frequently than lower end brands); and (3) the audio industry (same)
High end audio gear tends to fail more frequently precisely because it is not mass produced. Additionally, it tends to be a lot more complex than lower end equipment and thus there are simply more things that can and eventually will go wrong. And that, I think, is the real correlation.
Until recently I had always driven hand-me-down cars, from a time when cars were largely mechanical devices. Now I drive a car with all the latest gadgets. And, of course, it is in the shop with alarming regularity.
So, bottom line, definitely go for quality, but don't measure that concept by how much lighter it makes your wallet. Plasmas are a new technology and lcd's are a new application of an older technology. Both are more complex than crt's and for those reasons are going to have more problems.
The displays mentioned in this thread are examples of worse than average implementation. They happen to be inexpensive. But I'd be very surprised if there weren't just as many problems with certain "expensive" sets.