Will the lossy mono sound as it did in the theater, or would there have been a gain by presenting it lossless?
Originally Posted by eric scott richard /t/322696/a-few-words-about-jaws-in-blu-ray/60#post_3957412
Will the lossy mono sound as it did in the theater, or would there have been a gain by presenting it lossless?
Originally Posted by Robert Harris /t/322696/a-few-words-about-jaws-in-blu-ray/60#post_3957390
No. DIs are modified in every way imaginable.
RAH
A print from the camera original, even if eventually printed dye transfer. Premiere prints were also generally from the OCN.Originally Posted by FoxyMulder /t/322696/a-few-words-about-jaws-in-blu-ray/60#post_3957423
A final question, what did the studio heads and director view back in the day before digital intermediates when watching the finished article and before the public got to see the film in a cinema, by that i mean how far removed from the OCN did they view the film. ?
Hope you'll excuse me having a penny-dropping moment - dailies from the magenta negative because that's the one carrying the maximum image information (the green wavelength). Right?Robert Harris said:A print from the camera original, even if eventually printed dye transfer. Premiere prints were also generally from the OCN.
For three-strip, dailies were virtually all black & white from the magenta negative, with an occasional dye transfer shot or two for reference.
RAH
Precisely. The same negative that would be used for black & white re-issues, as well as early tv prints.Mark Oates said:Hope you'll excuse me having a penny-dropping moment - dailies from the magenta negative because that's the one carrying the maximum image information (the green wavelength). Right?
I did not trust my EnglishRobert Harris said:Which is precisely how your post was taken. Read you perfectly.
RAH
...I follow Your blog everydayhaineshisway said:Thanks for making this post and for including me in it.
Awww, jeez. There is that old saying that anything worth doing is worth doing right. Why buy this doc that people worked so hard on, then present it so shabbily? Why not use a second disc? I suspect there may be some ego involved - this doc was made outside of the studio and arguably better than theirs, so they made it look bad. When the original elements were available there is no reason to shrink it. I saw it on a large theatre screen and that looked fine, so full width letterbox should not have been a problem. Sad.Kevin EK said:I watched about 35 minutes of The Shark is Still Working. It is indeed windowboxed.
Ben Gardner is the fisherman who is floating in the hull of his boat when Hooper discovers him. Do we see him earlier in the movie?Kevin EK said:Just finished watching the Blu. It's a great one. My review will go up this weekend.
F
I watched about 35 minutes of The Shark is Still Working. It is indeed windowboxed.
And I misspoke in an earlier post. I mentioned "Ben Kingsbury". Not quite. I meant "Craig Kingsbury who played the part of Ben Gardner". As Carl Gottlieb has noted, Kingsbury holds a distinction for getting a DUI while driving a team of oxen.
Originally Posted by Kevin EK /t/322696/a-few-words-about-jaws-in-blu-ray/60#post_3957567
Just finished watching the Blu. It's a great one. My review will go up this weekend.
I watched about 35 minutes of The Shark is Still Working. It is indeed windowboxed.
Originally Posted by Robert Harris /t/322696/a-few-words-about-jaws-in-blu-ray/60#post_3957435
Premiere prints were also generally from the OCN.
RAH
That's exactly why I wasnt sure they were the same character. Good to have that cleared up.TravisR said:^ It took me years to realize that that the "fathers never met their mothers" fisherman was the same guy that Hooper discovers. Granted, I was a little kid at the time but that prostethic head isn't the best match.
In the video posted at HDDN Spielberg says the Bluray looks better than any elements he himself ever got to handle.FoxyMulder said:Would you say Jaws on Blu ray looks like a premiere print then as i imagine that is a good deal better than the average cinema print that most viewers got to see. ?
Not to question Spielberg, but he's hardly going to say "it looks alright". He's out to sell a product and is not going to be the most objective POV at this point in time.Sam Posten said:In the video posted at HDDN Spielberg says the Bluray looks better than any elements he himself ever got to handle.