The Exorcist UHD Review

4.5 Stars Still scary after all these years
The Exorcist Review

Warner marks the studio’s 100th and the movie’s 50th anniversaries with the UHD release of The Exorcist.

The Exorcist (1973)
Released: 26 Dec 1973
Rated: R
Runtime: 122 min
Director: William Friedkin
Genre: Horror
Cast: Ellen Burstyn, Max von Sydow, Linda Blair
Writer(s): William Peter Blatty
Plot: When a 12 year old girl is possessed by a mysterious entity, her mother seeks the help of two priests to save her daughter.
IMDB rating: 8.1
MetaScore: 81

Disc Information
Studio: Warner Brothers
Distributed By: N/A
Video Resolution: 2160p HEVC w/HDR
Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
Audio: Dolby Atmos, English 7.1 Dolby TrueHD, English 2.0 DTS-HDMA, Spanish 5.1 DD, French 5.1 DD, Other
Subtitles: English SDH, Spanish, French, Other
Rating: R
Run Time: Theatrical: 2 Hr. 2 Min.; Extended: 2 Hr. 12 Min.
Package Includes: UHD, Digital Copy
Case Type: 2-disc UHD keepcase with slipcover
Disc Type: UHD
Region: All
Release Date: 09/19/2023
MSRP: $29.99

The Production: 4.5/5

Long considered to be the scariest movie ever made, The Exorcist began making its mark on pop culture almost immediately upon its release on December 26, 1973, with one of the first spoofs of the film  appearing in the skit As the Stomach Turns on The Carol Burnett Show on CBS in early 1974. Other references over the years include The Goodbye Girl, Stay Tuned, Oh, God!, Ghostbusters (1984 and 2016), Pinky and the Brain, The Simpsons, Family Guy and even Toy Story. Linda Blair also poked fun (unsuccessfully) in the film Repossessed with Leslie Nielsen.

What has made this film timeless is its story of evil preying on an innocent child played by Linda Blair, the toll it takes on her actress mother (Ellen Burstyn) and her rented household, and the crisis of faith of priest Father Karras (Jason Miller). Warner has included both cuts of the film, the 1973 theatrical cut (unfortunately with the same blue and black WB Time Warner logo seen on the Extended Cut rather than the original “red worm” logo) and the 2000 Extended Cut (released theatrically as The Version You’ve Never Seen), and although the extended cut has some digitally enhanced effects, the more simple practical make-up and editing effects still hold up today.

Video: 5/5

3D Rating: NA

That’s right, I’m handing out a big 5 out of 5 stars for the video here, as this film has never looked better in my opinion. I was seven years old when the movie was first released, and my first viewing if the film was the CBS television premiere in the early 1980s on a 19-inch RCA color television. I have no idea what the original color grading was during its first run in theaters, but I can say that in the mid 1980s until the eventual transition to digital, the color timing of 35mm film prints often varied greatly from print to print and theater to theater, plus, seriously, who remembers exactly how a film looked from fifty years ago? Often, I’ve had trouble remembering what aspect ratio a film was in from 40 years ago, and have quite often been wrong in that respect. Yes, director William Friedkin had a reputation of altering color grading choices when supervising 2K and 4K digital transfers of his films, and it is highly likely he did so here. As a director, that is his choice, and to be honest, I would much rather have those changes made by the director than some unknown person with no connection to the film whatsoever.

So, how does The Exorcist look in 2160p with HDR10 high dynamic range? Outstanding! Both versions have been graded similarly, with bold and vivid colors where intended while some scenes are more muted. Detail is exceptional, revealing fabric textures, beard stubble (on Father Karras), and decomposing flesh on Regan. Film grain is natural and never bothersome, although there are a few shots with heavier grain that were either manipulated optically or were stock footage. Contrast is also exceptional, providing deep blacks with strong shadow detail. Each version has been provided its own BD100 disc and exhibits healthy bitrates often falling in the 90+ Mbps range.

Audio: 5/5

The default track for both versions of the film is a newly created and highly immersive Dolby Atmos track that is never overly gimmicky but will also bring the house down in its frightness factor. This is a wonderful use of special audio that respects its mono origins during its more dramatic and dialogue-driven scenes, but then cranks up the additional speakers when needed to really scare the pants off you. LFE is strong, lending nice emphasis to the crashes, banging bedposts, etc. The theatrical cut includes the original mono mix in DTS-HD MA 2.0.

Special Features: 2/5

Warner has started a trend this year to release many of its new to 4K catalog titles with only new 4K discs and ditching the Blu-ray altogether. This has meant that a lot of special features (other than archival audio commentaries) have been missing, although many have been made available on some digital retailers when redeeming the included Movies Anywhere code. That is the case once again here with The Exorcist.

Extended Cut
Audio Commentary with Director William Friedkin: Friedkin tends to ramble extensively in this commentary recorded for the 2001 DVD release of the Extended Cut, although he does chime in from time to time to discuss some of the changes that he made for this cut.

Theatrical Cut
Introduction by William Friedkin (upscaled 1080p; 2:09): Originally recorded for the initial DVD release of The Exorcist, Friedkin discusses the lasting legacy and impact the film has. Although the original 4:3 aspect ratio was maintained, someone at Warner upscaled a 480i 30fps video file to 1080p 24fps, resulting in a rather choppy-looking presentation, especially when it cuts to footage from the movie (which had been converted from 24 frames to 30 and back to 24, resulting in noticeable dropped frames).

Audio Commentary with Director William Friedkin: Of the two Friedkin commentaries in this set, this is the one to really take time to listen to. He seems much more prepared and engaged in this track, which I believe may have been recorded for the initial (or subsequent) DVD release of the theatrical cut.

Audio Commentary with William Peter Blatty with Sound Effects Tests: This is both a non-scene specific audio essay by author Blatty on both the book and movie (he wrote both) with some sound effects tests thrown in.

Digital Copy: A single Movies Anywhere code is included that can be used to redeem 4K digital copies of both versions along with special features (at the time of this review, only Apple TV and Movies Anywhere were the only retailers including the special features).

The Extended Cut includes the following archival special features: Beyond Comprehension: William Peter Blatty’s “The Exorcist” (27:45); Talk of the Devil (19:46); Raising Hell: Filming “The Exorcist” (30:02); “The Exorcist” Locations: Georgetown Then and Now (8:30); Faces of Evil: The Different Versions of “The Exorcist” (9:52); Radio Spots – The Devil Himself (1:01) and Our Deepest Fears (0:32); TV Spots – Most Electrifying (0:17), Scariest Ever (0:25), Returns (0:21) and Never Seen (0:20); and Trailers – The Version You’ve Never Seen (1:36) and Our Deepest Fears (1:35).

The Theatrical Cut includes the following archival special features: Introduction by William Friedkin (this time correctly encoded; 2:09); The Fear of God: 25 Years of “The Exorcist” (67:16); Original Ending (1:42); William Peter Blatty Interviews (Friedkin interviews Blatty) – The Original Cut (0:55), Stairway to Heaven (5:37) and The Final Reckoning (2:28); Sketches & Storyboards (2:45); TV Spots – Beyond Comprehension (0:32), You Too Can See “The Exorcist” (0:32), Between Science & Superstition (1:01), The Movie You’ve Been Waiting For (1:01), Nobody Expected It (0:31) and Life Had Been Good (0:31); and Trailers – Nobody Expected It (1:40), Beyond Comprehension (0:29) and Flash Image (1:39).

For those wondering what formats the digital retailers are offering (as of September 19, 2023):

Apple TV: Dolby Vision and Dolby Atoms on both versions, special features only accessible on Apple TV devices.
Vudu: Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos on both versions, no special features.
Movies Anywhere: Dolby Vision and Dolby Digital 5.1 on both versions plus special features
Prime Video: HD and Dolby Digital 5.1 on both versions, special features included on Extended Cut (after the conclusion of the movie in the same video file).

Overall: 4.5/5

The Exorcist still holds up as one of the most frightening and disturbing films of all time, even after 50 years since its original release. Video and Audio presentation on UHD disc is exceptional on both versions.

Todd Erwin has been a reviewer at Home Theater Forum since 2008. His love of movies began as a young child, first showing Super 8 movies in his backyard during the summer to friends and neighbors at age 10. He also received his first movie camera that year, a hand-crank Wollensak 8mm with three fixed lenses. In 1980, he graduated to "talkies" with his award-winning short The Ape-Man, followed by the cult favorite The Adventures of Terrific Man two years later. Other films include Myth or Fact: The Talbert Terror and Warren's Revenge (which is currently being restored). In addition to movie reviews, Todd has written many articles for Home Theater Forum centering mostly on streaming as well as an occasional hardware review, is the host of his own video podcast Streaming News & Views on YouTube and is a frequent guest on the Home Theater United podcast.

Post Disclaimer

Some of our content may contain marketing links, which means we will receive a commission for purchases made via those links. In our editorial content, these affiliate links appear automatically, and our editorial teams are not influenced by our affiliate partnerships. We work with several providers (currently Skimlinks and Amazon) to manage our affiliate relationships. You can find out more about their services by visiting their sites.

Share this post:

View thread (18 replies)

cda1143

Supporting Actor
Joined
May 4, 2013
Messages
624
Real Name
Chris
Superb review Todd. Thanks so much. And yes some excellent points
Great review and points.
Such excellent points that I’m going to take the liberty of quoting some in the other thread - where they are very on-point to the discussion. I hope you don’t mind.
 

Todd Erwin

Reviewer
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
10,455
Location
Hawthorne, NV
Real Name
Todd Erwin
Superb review Todd. Thanks so much. And yes some excellent points

Such excellent points that I’m going to take the liberty of quoting some in the other thread - where they are very on-point to the discussion. I hope you don’t mind.
When quoting a review on another thread, it is common courtesy to link back to that review.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMF

Noel Aguirre

Supporter
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
1,591
Location
New York City
Real Name
noel
When one writes a reply on this fairly new dark blue home page it rarely shows up. Why did HTF tinker with something that was well left alone? Anyways nice review but some respect or knowledge on how films looked in a certain period is obviously lacking. This does not look like the way it did in the ‘70’s That cover and this new transfer as far as I can seen looks like this is a Nightmare on Elm Street release from the late 80’s. My copy arrives next month from the UK and I’m glad for the definition increase but those colors look dreadful.
 

Robert Saccone

Premium
Joined
Jan 3, 2000
Messages
632
I have the disc and the review is spot on. It looks great. The grain does seem to vary a bit from scene to scene throughout the film but it's really a minor issue. The screen captures I've seen don't due justice to what's on the disc. The colors look natural and not all at blown out on my setup. One thing I made note of is that in the extras Friedkin talks about how both the image and sound had clarity and detail that wasn't seen back when the film was originally released. Spielberg basically said that same thing about Jaws when it was restored for disc. Both were talking about the blu-rays at the time. The UHDs of both these films just improve them that much more and give us something that we couldn't have back during the original release. I would have loved the original artwork for both The Exorcist and Jaws to have been used on the disc covers but in the end it is what's on the disc that is most important and so that didn't stop me from getting them.
 

Kyle_D

Supporting Actor
Joined
Aug 15, 2004
Messages
861
Real Name
Kyle Dickinson
The screen captures I've seen don't due justice to what's on the disc.
That's a big issue I'm seeing in the discourse surrounding this release. Too many people who have not actually watched it are decrying it based, in part, on some flawed iphone screen captures that, multiple owners of the disc have now warned, are not representative or accurate.

I watched the entirety of the theatrical cut tonight. Yes, the colors are bolder than past releases. Flesh tones are a little too sanguine for my tastes, and the grading/resolution bump finally reveals some of the seams in Dick Smith's outstanding make-up work. Still, the 4K master was apparently supervised by the director and the cinematographer before they passed, and despite my quibbles, it is absolutely the most effective, best looking presentation of the movie I've ever seen. Unlike some other controversial catalog releases, this does not appear to be a case where the UHD deviates from an approved reference in ways that are demonstrably contrary to the documented intent of the filmmakers.

No defense from me on the cover art or logo substitution, though. Both are truly unfortunate.
 
Last edited:

Malcolm R

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2002
Messages
25,237
Real Name
Malcolm
Would there be some legal reason for the logo change? Seems unlikely that they'd change it "just for kicks".

Does that small change allow them to take out a new or renewed copyright?
 

Lord Dalek

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2005
Messages
7,107
Real Name
Joel Henderson
Would there be some legal reason for the logo change? Seems unlikely that they'd change it "just for kicks".

Does that small change allow them to take out a new or renewed copyright?
There was a legal reason when the blu-ray was done back in 2010 as the worm was actually owned by Warner Music Group at the time. Now? who knows.
 

Mark B

Screenwriter
Joined
Sep 27, 2003
Messages
1,070
Location
Saranac Lake, NY
Real Name
Mark
Would there be some legal reason for the logo change? Seems unlikely that they'd change it "just for kicks".

Does that small change allow them to take out a new or renewed copyright?
Warner Bros has been replacing logos for home video releases since the 1980s. This is nothing new from them.
 

Todd Erwin

Reviewer
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
10,455
Location
Hawthorne, NV
Real Name
Todd Erwin
It is likely that since the 4K remaster was being completed on both versions that the Warner logo from the 2000 Extended Cut was used on both. It is NOT a new logo, since it says “Warner Bros. A Time-Warner Company.” If it was a new logo, it would say “Warner Discovery” instead.
 

Stephen_J_H

All Things Film Junkie
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
7,899
Location
North of the 49th
Real Name
Stephen J. Hill
There was a legal reason when the blu-ray was done back in 2010 as the worm was actually owned by Warner Music Group at the time. Now? who knows.
The worm is only licenced by WMG. There have been relatively recent films (The Nice Guys) that have used the worm logo. The question is whether the OCN was confirmed with the shield instead.
 

PMF

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 6, 2015
Messages
6,011
Real Name
Philip
Thanks for this incisively great review, Todd.
 
Last edited:
Most Popular
Available for Amazon Prime