Star Trek V: The Final Frontier UHD Review

3 Stars Flawed but looking good
Star Trek V: The Final Frontier Screenshot

I have always thoroughly enjoyed Star Trek V: The Final Frontier. There, I said it. Paramount never really had the right level of faith in their Star Trek franchise to budget appropriately it seems – with an exception perhaps being The Motion Picture, though that may have crept up on them more than having been a decision made. This would become more pronounced during the theatrical exploits of The Next Generation. That budgetary challenge and its impact on Shatner’s directorial effort cannot be understated. Everything from the visual effects work to the rushed and retooled ending contribute to the film’s faltering. Money won’t fix script problems, or editing kinks and creases, but it can help a filmmaker better realize an ambitious vision, remove some headaches and challenges, and even help distract audiences from broader issues.

Still, The Final Frontier succeeds best in the intimate. The campfire, the brig, the “pain” sequence in the Forward Observation Lounge, are some of the best scenes in the film. This outing is also the most physical, action-wise, for the Enterprise crew (a preference for Shatner), and thus makes this more naturally adventurous in spirit. There’s a better film to be had from the original intentions, but that’s not what we got. Despite all its foibles, I remain steadfastly fond of this film and Paramount’s 4K release is the best this film has ever looked in the home theater.

Star Trek V: The Final Frontier (1989)
Released: 09 Jun 1989
Rated: PG
Runtime: 107 min
Director: William Shatner
Genre: Action, Adventure, Fantasy
Cast: William Shatner, Leonard Nimoy, DeForest Kelley
Writer(s): Gene Roddenberry, William Shatner, Harve Bennett
Plot: Captain Kirk and his crew must deal with Mr. Spock's long-lost half-brother who hijacks the Enterprise for an obsessive search for God at the center of the galaxy.
IMDB rating: 5.5
MetaScore: 43

Disc Information
Studio: Paramount
Distributed By: N/A
Video Resolution: 2160p HEVC w/HDR
Aspect Ratio: 2.39.1
Audio: Other
Subtitles: English SDH, Spanish, French, Other
Rating: PG
Run Time: 1 Hr. 47 Min.
Package Includes: UHD, Blu-ray, Digital Copy
Case Type: Standard 4k with sleeve
Disc Type: BD50 (dual layer)
Region: A
Release Date: 09/06/2022
MSRP: $19.99

The Production: 3/5

“Damn it, Bones, you’re a doctor. You know that pain and guilt can’t be taken away with a wave of a magic wand. They’re the things we carry with us, the things that make us who we are. If we lose them, we lose ourselves. I don’t want my pain taken away! I need my pain!”

A mesmerizing Vulcan, Sybok (Laurence Luckinbill) orchestrates a hostile takeover of a rundown, forgotten backwater town called Paradise on the weapons-free, neutral planet of Nimbus III. In doing so, he takes the Klingon, Terran, and Romulan diplomats stationed there hostage. His plan, to lure a response and steal a starship so he can make the journey to the center of the universe, beyond the perilous Great Barrier, to find Sha Ka Ree – the place where all existence began. The Federation only has the USS Enterprise close enough to respond, and despite the ship still undergoing a refit and the crew amid some needed shore-leave, Captain Kirk, his crew, and the imperfectly operating starship are dispatched the Nimbus III.

“What does God need with a starship?”

Shatner’s The Final Frontier isn’t a great film by any standard. Unevenly structured, challenged by script weaknesses, and almost fatally impacted by a paucity of good visual effects work. The crew of the Enterprise on a mission to the center of the universe to find God is a tantalizing premise (even if Gene Rodenberry wasn’t a fan), but the ambitions of the story aren’t matched by its execution, and the production not supported with the budget necessary to “do it right.” There were other matters that hurt the film, chiefly the absence of Industrial Light & Magic (ILM) who were too busy with the effects work for Ghostbusters II, Indiana Jones and The Last Crusade, and of course creating the Pseudopod for James Cameron’s The Abyss. 1989 also proved to be a banner year for fun and popular films at the Box Office, all of which served as headwinds for this shaky entry.

This fifth big screen adventure also delightfully hues to the spirit of the television series. It’s filled with several memorable character moments and interactions. While the campfire sequence with Kirk (William Shatner), Spock (Leonard Nimoy), and Bones, AKA Dr. McCoy (DeForest Kelley) didn’t win everyone over, I’ve always adored the interaction; a mix of gruffness and silly that captures the decades these three members of Enterprise’s crew have served together and the friendship between them and the actors portraying them. The sequence after Sybok has taken command of the Enterprise – as Spock, Bones, and Kirk engage with Sybok as he seeks to free them of “their pain,” through his empathetic mind-meld technique – is one of the best scenes in any of the Star Trek films, and certainly a wonderful showcase for DeForest Kelly’s acting. That captivating showcase is emblematic of something William Shatner as director would so generously do for all the core cast. Even George Takei, who famously had a fractured relationship with Shatner, would get a delightfully comedic moment as Sulu. Takei also shared in interviews how Shatner as director was warm and generous. Shatner, it seems, understood the power and potential of the full crew of the Enterprise and the winning cast who inhabited them. Nichelle Nichol’s Uhura and Walter Koenig’s Chekov both get their own solo scenes (though Uhura’s isn’t widely enjoyed). Laurence Luckinbill’s Sybok is interesting. He’s not so much a villain, as a complication. There’s an attempt to add a more tradition villain in the form of a Klingon aggressor, Captain Klaa (Todd Bryant), in a pursuing Bird of Prey. It’s unconvincing. The Klingon, Terran, and Vulcan ‘hostages’ are Charles Cooper’s Korrd, David Warner’s St. John Talbot, and Cynthia Gouw’s Caithlin Dar. None are used particularly well, but David Warner would get another opportunity as a much better character in the next film, The Undiscovered Country, and a juicy part on Star Trek: The Next Generation’s season 4 two-part episode, The Chain of Command, as Gul Madred.

I spent this summer (2022) rewatching the entirety of Star Trek: The Original Series; three seasons of spirited adventures brimming with social commentary and an impressive exploration of science fiction concepts. I followed that with the animated series, a less successful expression of the root premise but still a beneficiary of thoughtful science fiction ideas. I am glad I was so deeply reacquainted with all the television episodes of Kirk and crew before seeing Star Trek V again for the first time in many years. It reminded me just how deeply reminiscent of the show The Final Frontier succeeded in being.

I recognize Star Trek V is the weakest of the original crew’s big screen adventures, but I am also very fond of the film. The Final Frontier was the first Trek film I got to see on the big screen. I was 14 and had the most joyous day at the cinema, watching Shatner’s Trek followed by James Cameron’s The Abyss. It’s one of my favorite memories at the cinema and has placed both Trek V and The Abyss deep within my cinema-loving DNA. Despite my memories of this film being warm and thrilling, I’ve always been aware of where this film went wrong. But you can love and be charmed and enamored with something while recognizing all its imperfections. That is what Star Trek V: The Final Frontier is to me.

Video: 4.5/5

3D Rating: NA

Framed at 2.39:1, the 4K scan of the original camera negative performed by Paramount for this release affords the film its best presentation that’s light years ahead of the previous Blu-ray release (which was hampered by aggressive digital noise reduction and artificial sharpening).

The Ultra High-Definition disc delivers an experience of this film that’s closer to perfect than ever before. With protected film grain and striking detail throughout, there’s a wonderfully ‘brand new’ sense to the experience. The colors are sublime in a few scenes, aided by the Dolby Vision grading. Flesh tones are warm and natural, and while the visual effects are largely unconvincing and ‘digital’, the crisp white of the USS Enterprise is quite something. The colors of The Great Barrier, the blue pop of ‘God,’ also stand out. Darker scenes, such as the Sybok sequence with Spock, Bones, and Kirk, are nicely balanced and details really shine through while the blacks are deep and rich. The moments of softness, while fleeting, will be noticeable if short.

I could not be more thrilled with how Star Trek V: The Final Frontier has fared in this 4K release.

Audio: 4.5/5

While we’re not getting a new Dolby Atmos mix for any of the Star Trek films besides the Director’s Cut of The Motion Picture, the Dolby TrueHD 7.1 repurposed from the previous Blu-ray release is still very good. Effective at creating the starship’s ambience, the real treasure in this track is the solid spread of surround effects and booming low frequency effects during the action. The failed hostage rescue attempt on Nimbus III a good example with a great deal going on and an audio track that’s pulling you in. Dialogue is clear and clean in the center channel, too. The score was composed by Jerry Goldsmith who returned to the cinematic franchise for the first time since The Motion Picture. He crafts a rousing score and delivers a sense of adventurous awe and wonder for the passage to and through the Great Barrier. It’s a magnificent score and one I’ve replayed countless times thanks to La-La Land Records superb 2-disc expanded version released in 2010. That version is now out of print, but Intrada Records brought it back into release and you can still grab a copy.

Special Features: 4/5

There are no new special features on this release. The included Blu-ray disc carries all the same special features found on the 2009 release, while the 4K disc also carries the 2 commentary tracks (so both Blu and 4K discs have the commentaries). It’s a good collection of special features, certainly comprehensive, but one that never exposed for those interested, the reality of its challenging production (besides mentions of budgetary impacts), nor the film’s pronounced failure and flaws. Still, there are interesting pieces to be found in here though precious few are in HD.

4K Disc:

  • Audio Commentary by William Shatner and Liz Shatner
  • Audio Commentary by Michael & Denise Okuda, Judith & Garfield Reeves-Stevens, and Daren Dochterman

Blu-ray disc:

  • Audio Commentary by William Shatner and Liz Shatner
  • Audio Commentary by Michael & Denise Okuda, Judith & Garfield Reeves-Stevens, and Daren Dochterman
  • Library Computer (HD)
  • Production
    • Harve Bennett’s Pitch to Sales Team (SD – 1:42)
    • The Journey: A Behind-The-Scenes Documentary (SD – 28:55)
    • Makeup Tests (SD – 9:50)
    • Pre-Visualization Models (SD – 1:41)
    • Rockman in the Raw (SD – 5:37)
    • Star Trek V Press Conference (SD – 13:42)
  • The Star Trek Universe
    • Herman Zimmerman: A Tribute (SD – 19:09)
    • Original Interview: William Shatner (SD – 14:37)
    • Cosmic Thoughts (SD – 13:05)
    • That Klingon Couple (SD – 13:05)
    • A Green Future? (SD – 9:24)
    • Star Trek Honors NASA (HD – 9:57)
    • Hollywood Walk of Fame: James Doohan (SD – 3:07)
    • Starfleet Academy SCISEC Brief 005: Nimbus III (HD – 3:02)
  • Deleted Scenes
    • Mount Rushmore (SD – :18)
    • Insults (SD – 2:03)
    • Behold Paradise (SD – :52)
    • Spock’s Pain (SD – 1:02)
  • Production Gallery (SD – 4:04)
  • Storyboards (HD)
    • Sha Ka Ree
    • The Face of God
    • Escape
  • Theatrical Trailer 1 (HD – 2:42)
  • Theatrical Trailer 2 (HD – 1:34)
  • TV Spots
    • Vacation Is Over (SD – :32)
    • Renegade (SD – :32)
    • Challenge of Rebellion (SD – :31)
    • Brothers (SD – :32)
    • Beyond (SD – :32)
    • Adventure (SD – :16)
    • Warp Speed Now (SD – :17)
  • The Gag Reel (SD – 1:08)

Digital copy of the film

Overall: 4.5/5

I have always thoroughly enjoyed Star Trek V: The Final Frontier. There, I said it. Paramount never really had the right level of faith in their Star Trek franchise to budget appropriately it seems – with an exception perhaps being The Motion Picture, though that may have crept up on them more than having been a decision made. This would become more pronounced during the theatrical exploits of The Next Generation. That budgetary challenge and its impact on Shatner’s directorial effort cannot be understated. Everything from the visual effects work to the rushed and retooled ending contribute to the film’s faltering. Money won’t fix script problems, or editing kinks and creases, but it can help a filmmaker better realize an ambitious vision, remove some headaches and challenges, and even help distract audiences from broader issues.

Still, The Final Frontier succeeds best in the intimate. The campfire, the brig, the “pain” sequence in the Forward Observation Lounge, are some of the best scenes in the film. This outing is also the most physical, action-wise, for the Enterprise crew (a preference for Shatner), and thus makes this more naturally adventurous in spirit. There’s a better film to be had from the original intentions, but that’s not what we got. Despite all its foibles, I remain steadfastly fond of this film and Paramount’s 4K release is the best this film has ever looked in the home theater.

Neil has been a member of the Home Theater Forum reviewing staff since 2007, approaching a thousand reviews and interviews with actors, directors, writers, stunt performers, producers and more in that time. A senior communications manager and podcast host with a Fortune 500 company by day, Neil lives in the Charlotte, NC area with his wife and son, serves on the Down Syndrome Association of Greater Charlotte Board of Directors, and has a passion for film scores, with a collection in the thousands.

Post Disclaimer

Some of our content may contain marketing links, which means we will receive a commission for purchases made via those links. In our editorial content, these affiliate links appear automatically, and our editorial teams are not influenced by our affiliate partnerships. We work with several providers (currently Skimlinks and Amazon) to manage our affiliate relationships. You can find out more about their services by visiting their sites.

Share this post:

View thread (49 replies)

KPmusmag

Screenwriter
Joined
Sep 9, 2011
Messages
1,642
Location
Henderson, NV
Real Name
Kevin Parcher
Thank you for your excellent review, Neil. I appreciate your comments and your affection for the film. I recall at the time disdaining it a bit for two reasons. Nichelle Nichols was a lovely, beautiful woman, but I felt at the time it was beneath Uhura's dignity to have to do that dance, really bothered me at the time. And Sybock being related to Spock bothered me, too, I guess because it had never been mentioned in TOS (that I recall).

When the first blu-ray came out some years ago, I watched it with a friend who "wanted to see what was wrong with it." (LOL) We both enjoyed it a lot more than we expected to, and the action sequences you mentioned do add to it immensely IMO.

I am loading it into the player in a few minutes and, after reading your review, looking forward to it even more.
 

Sam Favate

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
12,996
Real Name
Sam Favate
Yeah, it’s my least favorite of the original films but it’s far from the worst Star Trek film. As you point out, there is a lot to like in it. Unfortunately, the humor is what sinks it, IMO. There’s far too much winking at the audience and having us laugh at - not with - the characters we’d loved for over 30 years at that point.

Funny story, several years ago, Shatner was a surprise guest on a financial news show that’s hosted by a friend of mine. His producers didn’t tell him Shatner was coming, as a surprise since they knew he was a fan. So, they talk about whatever it was Shatner was promoting and then my friend says “So, okay, what’s the best Star Trek movie?” and he was goading him into saying Star Trek II (his favorite). Shatner didn’t miss a beat: “Star Trek V is the best. I directed it, you know.” “Yeah,” my friend says, “but Wrath of Khan…” “No,” Shatner says, “Star Trek V is the best.” And they left it there. Shatner was nice enough to shake hands with anyone in the newsroom who wanted to say hi.
 

KPmusmag

Screenwriter
Joined
Sep 9, 2011
Messages
1,642
Location
Henderson, NV
Real Name
Kevin Parcher
Unfortunately, the humor is what sinks it, IMO.

I really enjoyed watching it just now, but there were a few moments that seemed a bit like a sit-com to me. McCoy sure got some digs in on Spock. :)

Something I had forgotten was

Sulu crashing the shuttlecraft on the hanger deck. That was AWESOME! Have to admit I applauded and laughed my head off. Ran it back three times. I wonder if George Takei was annoyed that Sulu was portrayed as missing it even it was Sulu's first time).

The moment that felt like Star Trek to me and really makes it worthwhile for me is

When McCoy says to Kirk, "You said that men like us don't have families." and Kirk responds, "I was wrong." Tears, I admit it.

And wow it looks and sounds good, like watching it for the first time.
 

Dick

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 22, 1999
Messages
9,937
Real Name
Rick
Yeah, it’s my least favorite of the original films but it’s far from the worst Star Trek film. As you point out, there is a lot to like in it. Unfortunately, the humor is what sinks it, IMO. There’s far too much winking at the audience and having us laugh at - not with - the characters we’d loved for over 30 years at that point.

Agreed, absolutely. The humor (the execrable "Row Row Row Your Boat" scenes) may be intended to humanize these characters, but to my, mind they fall flat and are embarrassing. The ending seems like astronomical overreach and is, worse, confusing. The affects are only marginal. If Shatner had to helm this gargantuan ego trip of a film, he maybe should have created a film that worked well within his budget, a smaller film that actually did humanize the characters, the way they already had been much more effectively in WRATH OF KHAN without compromising in the effects department.
 

jayembee

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2020
Messages
6,775
Location
Hamster Shire
Real Name
Jerry
I'll be the stinker. I hated it. But you guys feel free to enjoy. I think of it as the "Spock's Brain" of the movie run.

Anyway...I'm not a hate-poster. I just wanted to give full disclosure. The reason I'm posting in this thread is that I recall back before the movie was released that The National Enquirer, or one of its wannabes, claimed to have gotten a copy of the ST5 script, and published an article describing what happens in the movie.

Naturally, everyone and his uncle poo-pooed it, saying that there was no way that a Star Trek movie would have all of those unbelievably stupid things in it. Then the movie came out, and it turned out that the Inquirer had it 100% correct after all. :)
 

Josh Steinberg

Premium
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
26,385
Real Name
Josh Steinberg
I remember something similar happening to me with the Inquirer and Generations. They reported on the ending a few months before it came out and had it right, I think they got the goods from a crew member for the reshoots.
 

Radioman970

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2006
Messages
8,365
Location
Could be anywhere
Real Name
James Perry
I'm such a forgiving Trek fan. I LOVE Spocks Brain. They even use it on a really great Wonder Years. After this in 1989 I drove home in silence, feeling and looking like the funeral was too long.

It would be fun to watch this movie with fans of it. I will never watch it without the commentary. The one with the Okudas is really good. Well all theirs on Trek stuff is great. I also like the Rifftrax.
 

jayembee

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2020
Messages
6,775
Location
Hamster Shire
Real Name
Jerry
Funny thing about the Wonder Years episode: they got the day wrong. In the episode, the kids were in school next day, but Star Trek was airing on Friday nights in the 3rd season.:oops:
 

Jeff F.

Second Unit
Joined
Mar 31, 1999
Messages
289
I absolutely hated this film when it first came out. In fact, when the credits came up in the movie theater, the audience actually booed it. I have come to appreciate it more over the years, but it is still the weakest of the six TOS movies, by far, IMO.
 

Sam Favate

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
12,996
Real Name
Sam Favate
The National Enquirer, or one of its wannabes, claimed to have gotten a copy of the ST5 script, and published an article describing what happens in the movie.
I recall an article, circa 1988, that was not from the Enquirer or some such rag, that talked about how upset DeForest Kelly was at the scene where he helps his father die. There was truth to that too.
 

Nelson Au

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 16, 1999
Messages
19,131
Thanks for the review Neil! I can appreciate the enthusiasm you have for this film.

I remember my main disappointments at the time was the less then competent effects house that did the miniature work. They do have a different look that what ILM does, so that can be a positive.

The sequences on Sha Ka Ree we’re odd as Kirk calls the Enterprise on his communicator and then drifts off, so he doesn’t finish the call?

I think there was a genuine effort to give the support cast some things to do that contribute to the plot or resolve a situation, but it didn’t always work.

It’s been a really long time since I’ve seen this and the other Star Trek films, other then Star Trek The Motion Picture which has taken over as my favorite of all the films. So with the new 4K releases, I plan to revisit all the films.

I forgot to add, it does have one of the better Goldsmith scores! That’s a highlight.

I was asking myself, when I saw this review for Star Trek V, where are the other 5 reviews for the new 4K releases?
 

Osato

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2001
Messages
8,247
Real Name
Tim
Thanks for the review Neil! I can appreciate the enthusiasm you have for this film.

I remember my main disappointments at the time was the less then competent effects house that did the miniature work. They do have a different look that what ILM does, so that can be a positive.

The sequences on Sha Ka Ree we’re odd as Kirk calls the Enterprise on his communicator and then drifts off, so he doesn’t finish the call?

I think there was a genuine effort to give the support cast some things to do that contribute to the plot or resolve a situation, but it didn’t always work.

It’s been a really long time since I’ve seen this and the other Star Trek films, other then Star Trek The Motion Picture which has taken over as my favorite of all the films. So with the new 4K releases, I plan to revisit all the films.

I forgot to add, it does have one of the better Goldsmith scores! That’s a highlight.

I was asking myself, when I saw this review for Star Trek V, where are the other 5 reviews for the new 4K releases?
Agreed. I’m loving Neil’s reviews!!
 

JoshZ

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
2,298
Location
Boston
Real Name
Joshua Zyber
If Shatner had to helm this gargantuan ego trip of a film, he maybe should have created a film that worked well within his budget, a smaller film that actually did humanize the characters, the way they already had been much more effectively in WRATH OF KHAN without compromising in the effects department.

In Shatner's defense, the film's budget was whittled down bit by bit while it was in development and production. It's not like Paramount told him up front that his movie wouldn't have access to ILM or half the other resources Nimoy had gotten on the last two. (And if they had, there's no way Shatner would have agreed to it.)
 

Josh Steinberg

Premium
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
26,385
Real Name
Josh Steinberg
And the combination of a set-in-stone release date and a looming writer’s strike forced them into a scenario where they had to film the script pages they had instead of taking the time to refine some of the concepts.
 

B-ROLL

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
5,035
Real Name
Bryan
And the combination of a set-in-stone release date and a looming writer’s strike forced them into a scenario where they had to film the script pages they had instead of taking the time to refine some of the concepts.
Shatner has some other thoughts (reading from his book Star Trek Movie Memories):


1663048857695.png

 

Chuck Mayer

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2001
Messages
8,516
Location
Northern Virginia
Real Name
Chuck Mayer
I remember being incredibly excited for this film in the lead-up, and ultimately very disappointed when I finally saw it. It was the (rather big) summer of 1989: Batman, Lethal Weapon 2, IJ and The Last Crusade, Ghostbusters II, Honey I shrunk the Kids, and Star Trek 5. ST4 had been such a huge hit, and this trailer played well.

I won't criticize it now, since I haven't seen it in many years (and I am content to let it lie). But my excitement to disappointment meter rarely pegged as high as it did for this film. I hope it gets a fine UHD disc for the fans, though.
 
Most Popular
Available for Amazon Prime