Search results

True. Roseanne still benefits financially from the original series (as she should) but in order for the show to continue, it had to be a spin-off.

What about a rehab stay? It was set up pretty much in the last couple of episodes, right along the knee surgery... And yeah it would probably be easier to kill her off, but I don't think that would work in terms of the show's tone. I really don't think the ratings would support the show past...

And due to all the legal stuff BTS with Roseanne, it's important to note this is a spin-off. This is a separate series. So if it's utterly awful, we have Roseanne Seasons 1-10, and then this would be the Season 9 dream season redux. I'll be checking it out, but I really hope they don't kill...

Yeah, and that's where I don't know. I mean, I think the only way to believably do it would be to have her die offscreen. I feel like there's no good way to do it, at least any way that would last past a handful of episodes...

IF ABC went ahead and retooled the show without Roseanne (and I'm not saying that's a wise decision), the only way I could even see it POSSIBLY working would be to title it "The Conners." I don't think branding it "Darlene," as some reports have suggested, would work. I don't think she's enough...

I really enjoyed the revival. It's already been renewed for another season. I'm a huge fan of the OS, own all the seasons on DVD (some from the original Anchor Bay, some from the Mill Creek re-releases) and thought the quality pretty well held up. Eager to see so many of the original guest...