Well, some of us relate more to live people than drawn figures. Also as I'm sure you already know, in between the 1991 animated version and the 2017 film version, the play was adapted for the Broadway stage as a "live" action musical where it ran for 13 years and received 9 Tony nominations. The...
No one is trying to change your mind or the "fact(s)" :) What you like or don't like is no concern of mine. I just thought it was an interesting anecdote and thought I'd share it. Don't take it so personally.
If one knows a film was shot in 3D, one doesn't have to see it in 3D to know why they're throwing things or flinging arms at you :) That being said, yes I have seen both films in 3D. Irrelevant to the discussion at hand but Eva Gabor sat behind me during the 3D screening of Dial M For Murder...
For what it's worth, from Hitchcock's bio:
"Jack Warner announced that the production would be one of the studio's three dimensional productions. The process did not interest Hitchcock, who recognized it for what it was - essentially anticinematic, with its constant reminder to the audience...
Well, to each his own as they say. Films like Dial M For Murder or Kiss Me Kate lose nothing in 2D. Granted, Hitchcock hated the 3D process so much that outside of the scissors scene, he pretty much ignored it. But they weren't better because of 3D anymore than Gog. I understand there's a niche...
I can't stand 3D myself. It's a gimmick that almost never contributes anything of importance to a film other than ducking when something is thrown at you and a bad movie in 3D movie doesn't make it any better. That being said Beauty And The Beast is the only 3D film I've seen where the 3D isn't...